From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jack Hill Subject: bug#39776: Explain difference between vim and vim-full (feature request) Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2020 11:32:44 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: References: <20200225153019.GB29791@jasmine.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:42104) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1j6d8p-0003Li-Vf for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 11:33:04 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j6d8p-0001ei-1p for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 11:33:03 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:50074) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j6d8o-0001eW-8p for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 11:33:03 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1j6d8o-00069L-6d for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 11:33:02 -0500 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20200225153019.GB29791@jasmine.lan> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Leo Famulari Cc: 39776@debbugs.gnu.org On Tue, 25 Feb 2020, Leo Famulari wrote: > On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 12:44:30AM -0500, Jack Hill wrote: >> Hi Guix, >> >> This is an enhancement request: I think we should explain what vim-full >> provides over vim in the package description. What do you think? > > Absolutely! Who will write the patch? :) I volunteer. I'll have to check what all vim-full provides first. I did want to record the idea an the bug tracker before I forgot, and check that others thought it was a reasonable idea. Thanks for confirming that. All the best, Jack