From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jack Hill Subject: Re: Packaging Jami progress Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2020 14:49:08 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: References: <20191215211230.66fea79e@interia.pl> <875zihclep.fsf@elephly.net> <20191222002815.4db8e9ca@interia.pl> <87d0cgpzqo.fsf@elephly.net> <20191223204317.3069e8ba@kompiuter> <20191225023416.0b36b90c@kompiuter> <20191227195731.6b869970@interia.pl> <20191227224639.5b7d1e74@interia.pl> <8736d4kcue.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <20200101162246.677552a6@kompiuter> <87tv5d2gn1.fsf@elephly.net> <20200104011328.5c5ab586@kompiuter> <87woa7xmem.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <20200106192326.498f2afe@interia.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55379) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ioYNE-00082q-PR for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jan 2020 14:49:13 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ioYND-0005ct-U2 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jan 2020 14:49:12 -0500 Received: from minsky.hcoop.net ([104.248.1.95]:47078) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ioYND-0005b8-R6 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jan 2020 14:49:11 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20200106192326.498f2afe@interia.pl> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Jan Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org On Mon, 6 Jan 2020, Jan wrote: > Or should I send one mail to guix-patches@gnu.org and > then send the rest to NNN@debbugs.gnu.org? Yes, I believe that sending to guix-patches first and then to NNN@debbugs is the recommended way. Best, Jack