From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Adam Pribyl Subject: Re: [ART] Website mockup rev2 Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2015 15:10:48 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: References: <1424484170.6354.13.camel@openmailbox.org> <87ioevk9fc.fsf@mango.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="-1463811484-1780600235-1424527848=:20239" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34648) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YPAlh-0003Zj-LU for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Feb 2015 09:10:54 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YPAle-0006Pd-Ee for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Feb 2015 09:10:53 -0500 Received: from sandbox.cz ([87.236.197.188]:50493 helo=mx.sandbox.cz) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YPAle-0006PM-7p for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Feb 2015 09:10:50 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sandbox.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 253EB38251 for ; Sat, 21 Feb 2015 15:10:48 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <87ioevk9fc.fsf@mango.localdomain> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. ---1463811484-1780600235-1424527848=:20239 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 21 Feb 2015, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > > Luis Felipe L=C3=B3pez Acevedo writes: > >> Here is a revision of the last mockup for the website [1]. This time >> aimed at a techie audience. >> >> http://sirgazil.bitbucket.org/static/temp/img/guixsd/home-view-rev2.jp= g > > I like this a lot better than the previous mockups (which would have > been great for something targetted at a different audience). > > Just one comment: I know that the screenshots are just placeholders, bu= t > there is no GNOME in the system distribution, yet all but one of the > screenshots show the GNOME Shell. > > I even wonder if screenshots are necessary at all or if it wouldn't be > better to show some diagrams of e.g. how the store works instead. The > diagrams were used in the slides but they are not in the official docs, > yet I found them immensely helpful in understanding the system. IMHO screenshots are needed - they very quickly show the state of the=20 distro you may expect. Adding info picture like diagrams is a good idea=20 too. > ~~ Ricardo Adam Pribyl ---1463811484-1780600235-1424527848=:20239--