From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ben Woodcroft Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/26] gnu: Add perl-file-pushd. Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2017 22:51:31 +1000 Message-ID: References: <20170323140056.23173-1-alex@pompo.co> <87lgrv2wht.fsf@openmailbox.org> <87bmsrks7s.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57573) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1crOgw-0004dE-Hy for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Mar 2017 08:51:43 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1crOgt-0001Hx-Ch for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Mar 2017 08:51:42 -0400 Received: from mailhub1.soe.uq.edu.au ([130.102.132.208]:58706 helo=newmailhub.uq.edu.au) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1crOgs-0001Hb-Q3 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Mar 2017 08:51:39 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87bmsrks7s.fsf@gmail.com> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: alex.sassmannshausen@gmail.com, Kei Kebreau Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Hi, On 24/03/17 18:13, Alex Sassmannshausen wrote: > Hi Kei, > > Kei Kebreau writes: > >> This series of packages builds and lints fine for me. There are over 200 >> dependent packages that would have to be rebuilt though, and >> core-updates is frozen to my knowledge. We can save this for the next >> core-updates cycle, though! >> >> Other Guix users, please correct me if I'm wrong. According to the established guidelines, this should be OK for master since it affects <300 packages, so if all dependent packages build then I don't see why we shouldn't do that. https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2016-10/msg00933.html > Thanks for the review! > > What command do you use to check the number of packages that would have > to be rebuilt? I'm asking, because if they are mainly perl libraries > then that figure of 200 really isn't that big of a deal: most perl libs > build super fast. To check the number of packages use "guix refresh -l" Thanks for the update patches, ben