From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christopher Baines Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: mail: Add notifymuch. Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2016 19:17:57 +0100 Message-ID: References: <20161009213318.29189-1-mail@cbaines.net> <57FB45D0.4080704@crazy-compilers.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42784) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1buO6Q-0001vv-Mf for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 14:18:11 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1buO6L-0005HC-Je for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 14:18:06 -0400 Received: from mira.cbaines.net ([2a01:7e00::f03c:91ff:fe69:8da9]:32889) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1buO6L-0005Fr-EE for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 14:18:01 -0400 Received: from [192.168.1.201] (88-104-161-249.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com [88.104.161.249]) by mira.cbaines.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 65CF513D8E8 for ; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 19:17:57 +0100 (BST) In-Reply-To: <57FB45D0.4080704@crazy-compilers.com> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: guix-devel@gnu.org On 10/10/16 08:40, Hartmut Goebel wrote: > Am 09.10.2016 um 23:33 schrieb Christopher Baines: >> + (description "notifymuch displays desktop notifications for messa= ges in >> +the notmuch database. The notifications are sent using libnotify to = a > > May I ask you to ass some words about what notmuch is? This saves the > ingenuous reader to recherch=C3=A9 what notmuch is. Thanks. I'm not quite sure how to improve on this. Copying in the full package=20 description for notmuch looks out of place to me, and I'm not sure if=20 just saying "the notmuch email database" instead of "the notmuch=20 database" is sufficient?