From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:54452) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gxBAP-0006Xf-NU for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 08:47:06 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gxBAO-00007j-MZ for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 08:47:05 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:34138) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gxBAL-0008Up-Rm for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 08:47:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gxBAL-0004Rk-Nh for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 08:47:01 -0500 Subject: [bug#34600] [PATCH 1/5] gnu: emacs-which-key: Update to 3.3.1. Resent-Message-ID: References: <87a7ipvqgb.fsf@posteo.net> <7BB7B432-CA51-42E7-AA4C-67F3B9AA3AF3@riseup.net> <87ef81lybo.fsf@posteo.net> From: swedebugia Message-ID: Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2019 09:28:24 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <87ef81lybo.fsf@posteo.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Brett Gilio Cc: 34600@debbugs.gnu.org On 02/21/2019 08:46 PM, Brett Gilio wrote: > swedebugia writes: > >> Brett Gilio skrev: (21 februari 2019 03:13:40 CET) >> Hi Brett >> You send a patch series without first sending an email to get a bug number. >> We do this to keep series together under 1 number. >> >> Could you try again and close these? > You're going to have to be more specific. Do all patch series go under a > single bug number? Sorry if I was unclear. Yes. The details are here: http://guix.info/manual/en/Submitting-Patches.html#Sending-a-Patch-Series It was a bad idea to tell you to send them again, but it is nice to have them together. And thanks for the patches anyway :)