From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: sirgazil Subject: bug#26006: [Website] Integral update proposal Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2017 21:52:41 -0500 Message-ID: References: <57bc6255-c3a1-61e2-fee4-5b6f523a9885@zoho.com> <87injztuax.fsf@gnu.org> <877f0d65qe.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39142) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dLh7F-0004Zw-HB for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Jun 2017 22:36:06 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dLh7C-0005YE-TS for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Jun 2017 22:36:05 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:47374) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dLh7C-0005Y0-QY for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Jun 2017 22:36:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dLh7C-0002xV-D6 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Jun 2017 22:36:02 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <877f0d65qe.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 26006@debbugs.gnu.org On 15/06/17 02:59, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Hello, > > sirgazil skribis: > >> On 13/06/17 17:08, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > [...] > >>> I found it a little bit confusing that talks and papers now appear as if >>> they were blog posts, but after all it’s probably better to have it this >>> way, especially since tags allow people to find them more easily I guess. >>> >>> The packages pages look better than what we have (minus the loss of the >>> JS code to display the build status ;-)). >> About the JS, I couldn't figured out exactly how it works, so that I >> could adapt it to the new page structure. Additionally, there is the >> problem that the JS looks for packages in the DOM by id, and package ids >> are not unique, which confuses me. Also, using duplicated id attributes >> is non-valid HTML. > The current code that generates the package pages intends to compute > unique anchor names for each package (see ‘packages->anchors’), and I > think it’s those IDs that the JS code uses, isn’t it? Right. My mistake :) > >>> I think there are a few little changes that were made in the current >>> site that were lost in the process. For example, on the front page, we >>> now have “DOWNLOAD v0.13.0” instead of “TEST v0.13.0”. I’ve also seen >>> that links to the package definitions at git.sv.gnu.org from the package >>> pages no longer include the commit. Anyway, these are really tiny >>> issues but we should pay attention to them when we migrate. >> I updated the download button. >> >> As for the commit in the links, I tried to add it, but couldn't. I >> implemented this website using the Guix API as a user (installing guix >> with guix), but it seems that the code to generate the commit part in >> the links requires that the guix in the GUILE_LOAD_PATH be a git >> repository, right? Since it uses "git describe" on "guix/config.scm". > Indeed, good point. I guess we could have a fallback case for when ‘git > describe’ fails. > On a more practical level, what would you like the workflow to be like > from there on? I would prefer hosting the source on gnu.org rather than > {bitbucket,gitlab,github}.com and I would also prefer Git over > Mercurial, but I don’t want to be a hindrance so I’m open to > discussions. :-) No worries. The idea was to move the useful parts to guix-artwork on gnu.org. To be honest, when I started this version of the website I was just motivated on implementing the designs and exploring a way to organize modules in a haunt website so that data, builders and templates were separated. But I was not very interested in dealing with git workflows, and strict commit messages. Sorry about that :) So, what do we do? Create a branch on guix-artwork and drop these files there to complete what is missing? I don't know... -- https://sirgazil.bitbucket.io/