From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:303:e224::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms8.migadu.com with LMTPS id SCxhERORp2V2jQAA62LTzQ:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 17 Jan 2024 09:34:27 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:303:e224::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1.migadu.com with LMTPS id SCxhERORp2V2jQAA62LTzQ (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 17 Jan 2024 09:34:27 +0100 X-Envelope-To: larch@yhetil.org Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=illucid.net header.s=fm1 header.b=O6GOyQEF; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm3 header.b=rUEtcKMn; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1705480467; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:resent-cc:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references: list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post: dkim-signature; bh=X45ORw9nvO0mYQYr4LNBpceraneEYmg1Bp1ixCWl+Gg=; b=VZH0hsna7wbp9XUzrJTHbzzkTU6cZvJZ9qmxkLOX50VhzAayo6fz7dXlvkdSldFbkwyuOJ oxflq9l3stLfgCAhlleuCsZon3HeCh8bGsZi0xyoovmO8x/oMmeXiYk21hgQx0x6AKoeS1 YHgYinDytGIyjaM2biSQR5RJYp+S5ZeULYogjeJyrU2Vm2AeDmq/GuVXVpvMnge+7TsFk+ mjoXmPMxfEUpCkvnVh02yrnMCqLiRGgmh0svbO6zZitblr1cyd26Y3rgrd3qR8cnxJB5XZ P6XBkxC/UL3TYPg78yHqYQTdz7w6WPXUA8EIcfBaQnEjtv5HaKITHeofRTwC/Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=illucid.net header.s=fm1 header.b=O6GOyQEF; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm3 header.b=rUEtcKMn; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1705480467; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=D+2cDzgzjmrJb2m4p/QI5AWLvxbv64lIw9tmMOFW9A05gc9GIZiXzBkJ7+02kvuHk2YgOd oki6mEzqYyyIJPpVzvW5VC7SYBS4DPNRAAYv5NMVEOwGtjxu6hqe8rThBkd2WQDPLRbtU0 xPdXhmDqllA5xvCzGL+WDw77V+iaz7pwygTsumVQ9i9/mRYgMDCet6Vc9Oi/rD/YKo0/tx DQfn48BINZR5eB4AC0uiFn0dYUCfnJA26vNsNY+R8G4NC6G7qK/e/T4+YOCyi4yJ8EDKXt mlzH0orp8+Vp674ELn+W9H0L5Yleq+3cV+kWQZ8AlbOg2g1hytku7TbBGR63yg== Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE1A21C608 for ; Wed, 17 Jan 2024 09:34:25 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rQ1N7-0004t5-Jz; Wed, 17 Jan 2024 03:34:05 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rQ1N3-0004ry-Pt for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Jan 2024 03:34:03 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rQ1N3-0007x1-83 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Jan 2024 03:34:01 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rQ1N3-0004gP-Vl for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Jan 2024 03:34:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#68163] [PATCH] gnu: Prevent stale cache use when `%package-module-path' is parameterized. Resent-From: antlers Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2024 08:34:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 68163 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: zimon.toutoune@gmail.com, 68163@debbugs.gnu.org Cc: dev@jpoiret.xyz, othacehe@gnu.org, Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= , me@tobias.gr, rekado@elephly.net, guix@cbaines.net X-Debbugs-Original-To: "Simon Tournier" , antlers , 68163@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.170548040017952 (code B ref -1); Wed, 17 Jan 2024 08:34:01 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Jan 2024 08:33:20 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50683 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rQ1MN-0004fT-L5 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 17 Jan 2024 03:33:19 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:470:142::17]:60312) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rQ1ML-0004fG-E8 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 17 Jan 2024 03:33:18 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rQ1MF-0004hs-2e for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Jan 2024 03:33:11 -0500 Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.26]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rQ1MA-0007uK-Et; Wed, 17 Jan 2024 03:33:10 -0500 Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 695E85C0103; Wed, 17 Jan 2024 03:33:01 -0500 (EST) Received: from imap44 ([10.202.2.94]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 17 Jan 2024 03:33:01 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=illucid.net; h= cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject :subject:to:to; s=fm1; t=1705480381; x=1705566781; bh=X45ORw9nvO 0mYQYr4LNBpceraneEYmg1Bp1ixCWl+Gg=; b=O6GOyQEF4HOjz11MNcLJotb7Lt dq7PU290hJj1qJk4mDp5PJrc2v9e71SkeCtxGD/79s/nHUSlVyZRCdQCqtKRUV3g +gbe2zc0xuzFEKEBnh5VOhC4Fec596lJJ6Jg7TDIAvhK9XGp2E+nwWtehUwUYJrG gOIVnwBTDlgLrwVl3XFQyxHXkIyCbnM3yRvOj67nPE335E4Nxh7yeXDkyxIR93BB LPQ4HpS8sSicIkmE6VfFEAmb1XXOkPfSbiRCmxw1s1scIbSP8aYdKZxuxU47faNX 3M2JguQ0BQwiPvTRvcNVyUwm0Fx+cUkTRN791luUNVJgLmpghWAvOZk8wNvw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to :to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= fm3; t=1705480381; x=1705566781; bh=X45ORw9nvO0mYQYr4LNBpceraneE Ymg1Bp1ixCWl+Gg=; b=rUEtcKMnSpKBTPIC9CqUQVRl+QOUuMCyecaAvfMtLJqs 35xvcAtoZvc51BdnUz8oooLxllXLSGHyacTF85ckl5EbgNA64pm2uQDx+CoKYT9F LOLICWvxI1n/RWS0Bmiu0kwZBPanmAfRKS/MwRIk/b8XTrvocLr2HoTh2si8qOX8 hFQKjFM73SSdohADVnc0Wnq5sRd1rMBNBlH/5afE/MVym580Tf1KD9+2EYvaslDU jrgVaaOKWyJLgXxTsxKPlXLqT78LO/GK14VBEPPcYUa4StXTnMcwxE8KI2PgqGQ7 RMlSRC/V78K3NaSkqMU37/DT0Csnlp73qQItDsuE1Q== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvkedrvdejgedguddvudcutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd enucfjughrpefofgggkfgjfhffhffvvefutgesthdtredtreertdenucfhrhhomheprghn thhlvghrshcuoegrnhhtlhgvrhhssehilhhluhgtihgurdhnvghtqeenucggtffrrghtth gvrhhnpeeiffejfffffefhhfehtedtieekteffudeikefgteeludeuuedvffeggfekkeev udenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpegrnh htlhgvrhhssehilhhluhgtihgurdhnvght X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i7f19465a:Fastmail Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 88D6F36A0076; Wed, 17 Jan 2024 03:33:00 -0500 (EST) X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.9.0-alpha0-1374-gc37f3abe3d-fm-20240102.001-gc37f3abe MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <4bc21e5a-dccb-4427-9ad4-2225ce132d39@app.fastmail.com> References: <87mstbzq26.fsf@gmail.com> <4bc21e5a-dccb-4427-9ad4-2225ce132d39@app.fastmail.com> Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2024 00:32:39 -0800 Content-Type: text/plain Received-SPF: pass client-ip=66.111.4.26; envelope-from=antlers@illucid.net; helo=out2-smtp.messagingengine.com X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-to: antlers X-ACL-Warn: , antlers via Guix-patches From: antlers via Guix-patches via Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -5.78 X-Spam-Score: -5.78 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: EE1A21C608 X-Migadu-Scanner: mx12.migadu.com X-TUID: zzV5xoTjAI/d Updates: > I don't know if a.) there's any cause to be concerned about the > performance of this tweak, or b.) that you care to support the > behavior at all, but I hope I've made my own use-case clear and the > patch is there if you see fit c: a.) I glued hyperfine to a pair of guix repl endpoints, scaled up until I hit segfaults, no difference b.) Maybe `specification->package' just has some particular notion of what's "current", like "current-channels" does, in which case we can rule out complacence with the parameter as a non-feature-- but I certainly isn't the same notion. c.) I had the bright idea to set GUIX_PACKAGE_PATH at build time, first on the command-line and then in the channel modules, but it didn't work out-- felt silly for a minute there. Hey, how do third party channels usually resolve `search-path'? Isn't that the same thing, packages and patches in the same repo? Or are they just expected to use `local-file' and relative paths? I'll look into this another time. If B or C had come to fruition I'd have closed the issue with 'em, and something like B is up for interpretation-- I don't mind either way (happy to carry the patch on my own). But if I enjoy these instances of syntax-sugar in my own channels (which I do :p), and if the Guix repo utilizes + is cleaner for them as well, then I figure it'd be a shame (barring a solution like C) to interpret the implementation as one which excludes other channels.