ng0, Leo,

Leo Famulari wrote on 18/01/18 at 18:08:
> On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 08:17:01AM +0000, ng0 wrote:
>> Right, I did not consider this. Yes, although badass is quiet generic
>> and not a very unique namespace? I'm not sure.
> 
> That's true. Do we want to use the name 'badass' for this package? I
> didn't find any 'badass' packages in Debian. I think it's okay, unless
> there is some other 'badass' software that is very prominent and that we
> might package someday. But I can't think of any.

This is intolerably sheddy but that seems to be in the spirit of the
package: we could also ‘creatively abbreviate’ it to github-badass.

T G-R, who was hoping for arbitrary greenscale bitmaps. Oh well.