From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id 6A0MO5HiF2BNLAAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 01 Feb 2021 11:14:25 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2 with LMTPS id MAlFNpHiF2CkOgAAB5/wlQ (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 01 Feb 2021 11:14:25 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A7C59403A3 for ; Mon, 1 Feb 2021 11:14:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:59416 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l6XA0-0004XG-6y for larch@yhetil.org; Mon, 01 Feb 2021 06:14:24 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:44386) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l6X9o-0004Sp-3O for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Feb 2021 06:14:12 -0500 Received: from mail-out.m-online.net ([212.18.0.10]:53182) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l6X9l-0001AA-Vs for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Feb 2021 06:14:11 -0500 Received: from frontend01.mail.m-online.net (unknown [192.168.8.182]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DTlgz1txFz1rvBS for ; Mon, 1 Feb 2021 12:14:07 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (dynscan1.mnet-online.de [192.168.6.70]) by mail.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DTlgz1bzxz1tYVY for ; Mon, 1 Feb 2021 12:14:07 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mnet-online.de Received: from mail.mnet-online.de ([192.168.8.182]) by localhost (dynscan1.mail.m-online.net [192.168.6.70]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VMRlaQjCRAvO for ; Mon, 1 Feb 2021 12:14:06 +0100 (CET) Received: from hermia.goebel-consult.de (ppp-188-174-55-198.dynamic.mnet-online.de [188.174.55.198]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.mnet-online.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Mon, 1 Feb 2021 12:14:06 +0100 (CET) Received: from lenashee.goebel-consult.de (lenashee.goebel-consult.de [192.168.110.2]) by hermia.goebel-consult.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04DD26025C for ; Mon, 1 Feb 2021 12:14:04 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: branch staging updated (5aeee07 -> 104151f) From: Hartmut Goebel To: guix-devel@gnu.org References: <875z3cu83b.fsf@netris.org> Organization: crazy-compilers.com Message-ID: Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2021 12:14:03 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.6.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <875z3cu83b.fsf@netris.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US Received-SPF: none client-ip=212.18.0.10; envelope-from=h.goebel@crazy-compilers.com; helo=mail-out.m-online.net X-Spam_score_int: -26 X-Spam_score: -2.7 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.7 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.079, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -2.36 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 4A7C59403A3 X-Spam-Score: -2.36 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn1.migadu.com X-TUID: VRlpzhT8U41l Hi, maybe the process should be the other way round: staging -> "staging-frozen" -> master no "staging-next" This would allow committers to use the same workflow all the time. No need for any technical solution preventing to push to staging. -- Regards Hartmut Goebel | Hartmut Goebel | h.goebel@crazy-compilers.com | | www.crazy-compilers.com | compilers which you thought are impossible |