From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp10.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:4876::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms8.migadu.com with LMTPS id oIHUGPH9SGXKyQAAG6o9tA:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 06 Nov 2023 15:53:37 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:4876::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp10.migadu.com with LMTPS id oIHUGPH9SGXKyQAAG6o9tA (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 06 Nov 2023 15:53:37 +0100 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EAFD716405 for ; Mon, 6 Nov 2023 15:53:36 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1699282417; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:resent-cc: resent-from:resent-sender:resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post; bh=tuv7j1POsOiDK/vV2LVtLJ0sT3690rr3SBFO6yzWPVI=; b=aA8VnGoHJcZgKYkiYpipK0X1pLFLwnaLSnjEQU4Vs7koT8dILa1sDG1EsULXV4KuFzdnTm PkM0XlP+EyQrGyfqk8km8a4W5WnALAR8yti2zVMBRf/pQywqU2rEAU3ypSz5EIiCoBDChQ EpPyQD5mf3vBzlN4Ya/lZQI56cBXmjOn5hwNrrMnJq1MMm3ICH3zlTKvMA9BmF005gpuEd lrU8enon1RDzCdTM3wtwmSAIx1jKtN54LMqGlv8TYqd7UU6vW5nibQAs0abRxt2GzMA9IR zRd7uS5cmNBW6iHnFyCm8JP9LKinvytDqfKmDkNOZenrXJ/mX4j3caFHQLZpyQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1699282417; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=SkmMnNZDLwKtEdsTLfOzPFl1EJ0BfMY4vwMNizj3GdTge4tMg+//AAmGp7GRSAAfdOzMJa OrzZ9W6zQFDgLplD0wKifX2JySnX56WTD1vCtH8E5wW168h7ZS0pQRZ/85hOtb/Jx6eznG 1lDUKs96Pw5nzWGlxTdatd9mT4sasVDktg7qx1I/k9JNUMY9YuzsYlkz/rXVKy1XUpI3bH eTZyzyNpnjQCpIkZZiQA7vWPiP+Q6ZXTxojbM5kXwxrY5eEt3aRI6ELTTIbsNJUjAi0sM7 SseQCEYkSmvV1XEgcw2M3cwGU+WIiQHTudU4diW4CSG5jZ/2tZAG/ZtRPhEsTw== Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1r00yl-0007By-0B; Mon, 06 Nov 2023 09:53:27 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1r00yj-0007A2-1m for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Nov 2023 09:53:25 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1r00yi-0004hL-Os for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Nov 2023 09:53:24 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1r00zJ-0006vQ-RT for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Nov 2023 09:54:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#66935] [PATCH 4/4] services: dovecot: Fix incorrect type for ssl? field. Resent-From: Bruno Victal Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2023 14:54:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 66935 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Herman Rimm Cc: 66935@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 66935-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B66935.169928242426596 (code B ref 66935); Mon, 06 Nov 2023 14:54:01 +0000 Received: (at 66935) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Nov 2023 14:53:44 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38936 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1r00z2-0006uu-0d for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 Nov 2023 09:53:44 -0500 Received: from smtpm2.myservices.hosting ([185.26.105.233]:58458) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1r00yy-0006ug-Gh for 66935@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 Nov 2023 09:53:41 -0500 Received: from mail1.netim.hosting (unknown [185.26.106.173]) by smtpm2.myservices.hosting (Postfix) with ESMTP id DED4A20E45; Mon, 6 Nov 2023 15:53:00 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail1.netim.hosting (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45C7680060; Mon, 6 Nov 2023 15:53:00 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mail1.netim.hosting Received: from mail1.netim.hosting ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail1-2.netim.hosting [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id HoNqELPP1_6J; Mon, 6 Nov 2023 15:52:59 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.1.116] (unknown [10.192.1.83]) (Authenticated sender: lumen@makinata.eu) by mail1.netim.hosting (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A69CF8005B; Mon, 6 Nov 2023 15:52:59 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2023 14:52:55 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Content-Language: en-US References: <4f4f0ed0ce61588137a3e1e9ba96cfb190a2cd75.1699124200.git.mirai@makinata.eu> From: Bruno Victal In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -4.45 X-Spam-Score: -4.45 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: EAFD716405 X-Migadu-Scanner: mx10.migadu.com X-TUID: WXGsnVp6W1ph Hi Herman, On 2023-11-05 18:03, Herman Rimm wrote: > Guix pull fails with the [PATCH 4/4] commit. It could be because > 'ssl? #t' is still used for the inet-listeners in the default > dovecot-configuration. Oops, this must have passed under the radar due to some stale .go file issue, nice catch! > By the way, I see that the "required" value can be used for the > ssl dovecot core setting, but for the inet-listener this is not > specified: https://doc.dovecot.org/configuration_manual/service_configuration/?highlight=inet_listener#ssl. According to the dovecot link you provided, it isn't clear whether this 'ssl' in the context of inet-listener is a dovecot boolean [1] or is a string in the same manner like the core ssl setting [2]. I'm afraid the dovecot documentation isn't the clearest here. > I think changing the ssl? option type from boolean to string should > be done for all boolean valued options simultaneously in a separate > patch, if at all. Some of the boolean options are really dovecot boolean, it's only this ssl? field in the inet-listener that is strange. I think it might be better to leave it for a separate patch as you have suggested, in that case feel free to discard the 4/4 patch. > Also, can you post any amended patch series in chronological order > so it's easier to apply? I'm afraid not since this is a limitation of email, there's no guarantee that emails arrive in the same order that they're sent. [1]: [2]: -- Furthermore, I consider that nonfree software must be eradicated. Cheers, Bruno.