From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org>
Received: from mp11.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::])
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	by ms5.migadu.com with LMTPS
	id uL5cBGRkMWNg5gAAbAwnHQ
	(envelope-from <guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org>)
	for <larch@yhetil.org>; Mon, 26 Sep 2022 10:35:48 +0200
Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::])
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	by mp11.migadu.com with LMTPS
	id aIluBGRkMWO7tQAA9RJhRA
	(envelope-from <guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org>)
	for <larch@yhetil.org>; Mon, 26 Sep 2022 10:35:48 +0200
Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9EA5FC696
	for <larch@yhetil.org>; Mon, 26 Sep 2022 10:35:47 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost ([::1]:55682 helo=lists1p.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
	(envelope-from <guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1ocjDt-0007vL-FX
	for larch@yhetil.org; Mon, 26 Sep 2022 04:12:17 -0400
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55692)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <philip@philipmcgrath.com>)
 id 1ocj9x-0005PR-13
 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Sep 2022 04:08:13 -0400
Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.27]:37403)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <philip@philipmcgrath.com>)
 id 1ocj9t-0003qN-Mf
 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Sep 2022 04:08:12 -0400
Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46])
 by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93D015C00BA;
 Mon, 26 Sep 2022 04:08:08 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162])
 by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 26 Sep 2022 04:08:08 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=
 philipmcgrath.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding
 :content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to
 :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:sender:subject
 :subject:to:to; s=fm2; t=1664179688; x=1664266088; bh=D/0CoSCMSq
 9sBCuwNLjch68BMmpPRf4pTyX1pgCVsYY=; b=MAxvw+BspbOunn5vdbEXY0Jag7
 CgpV5QE55uvjeipqDFWvwcLQtCy7qHleJpgUZrFPwNq5eVZWbXx5vJxzlTHr2/9c
 I32UMLdRXrwQlkv7kpUIoYxi8g3U5ThmIR7MMue0qUZoGKYwe32oGP6KKaK+6jjx
 dov/GbLfh2Qo1cpxdp/xAiz/HMnDnHv2aVgR9n4fUqr2SEVdljxO+StkszG/u07I
 e4wP5HQayanKlQhuOgpPyzaTdK1PQcDvPuSKIK5nK0AlAuedkODNAK50cUk95c/f
 nFRc6arQZQL/unQ1nRVEzgwls+U91zY6XcWOAEVVjqMS+0dm9c5N2UeIQvsA==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=
 messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding
 :content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from
 :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references
 :reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy
 :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; t=1664179688; x=
 1664266088; bh=D/0CoSCMSq9sBCuwNLjch68BMmpPRf4pTyX1pgCVsYY=; b=D
 TwTi3hn9TEWQW3/4XbCNc8LB3ljs7luzyQChUxtYq6b1qROc69VyWlwjMqmJ8Rrf
 VCCR0QXoD8DL2wB+oaVCjmubIQGvP86E0QNCnSUxcauo3hvV4oq8GU/kZ02f4CiQ
 HsIOiNru74xi5YwxtVvfLN5b1zIOr8r8T+qoI8r+chIz9QWs23YJmVh593EcnqDI
 5JuFbdyyJfHyaJmHY98cDdFMiG00CraavDk0/6wiVxC/jc5WSqMhyt+BDX3IY/Da
 hNWhNldIFneIwRJkmeQIFy3calFxkqEo2ulvZoXcqjRIJ+1U8MEHWHQlI0jnrcVY
 mLJgDuvClTHY9VxE8ntwA==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:6F0xYzNI1V74vHwvQK3LzlB3bHhwGdQgr3Qibg1nDtgR7_eCPc1amQ>
 <xme:6F0xY9-rpxDK1vKTgJXJlPKnFfCwV4MoNsE5Ap3BdAy-s6LtUX-TYKnmmjKOPECeJ
 pVooLdwm9KuPCP0kwI>
X-ME-Received: <xmr:6F0xYyTgwoYCCvL0DKbQreRcwN1M-D_XhhUFyuBB8bnxwtzhWRHZxtxo53zJYrhGe2P-K-kfoWSaTEiv8RbpkEhPjFjZM8gHzNK7gg>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvfedrfeegvddgtdduucetufdoteggodetrfdotf
 fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen
 uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne
 cujfgurhepkfffgggfuffvvehfhfgjtgfgsehtkeertddtfeejnecuhfhrohhmpefrhhhi
 lhhiphcuofgtifhrrghthhcuoehphhhilhhiphesphhhihhlihhpmhgtghhrrghthhdrtg
 homheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepjeeiffeghefhueeiueffgfefueetieffgedvfeeu
 vdekgeejvdevheejudefieehnecuffhomhgrihhnpehophgvnhhgrhhouhhprdhorhhgne
 cuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepphhhihhl
 ihhpsehphhhilhhiphhmtghgrhgrthhhrdgtohhm
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:6F0xY3szbZT_Uc0-HOTR0q4IbZHH5jC91iZoHgZGaEuW8OeLcBvCxQ>
 <xmx:6F0xY7cxZ6pGuAy2XbTn_eQsjC5shm738ExnrhaCbtGXyHkRI8pelA>
 <xmx:6F0xYz0xNUwqJppwuNJVEBVyjRLtLNChTd3cj9TG19jnLdsYmi2QMQ>
 <xmx:6F0xYzQgQUEOvT4rKO11vW6VEQkBvoTu6fyX4rT_Lyvcgfu2BlNRDA>
Feedback-ID: i2b1146f3:Fastmail
Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Mon,
 26 Sep 2022 04:08:03 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <a4e8fa9f-eb88-8d62-d0b5-08639f25cdb0@philipmcgrath.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2022 04:07:57 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.3.0
Subject: Re: What 'sh' should 'system' use?
Content-Language: en-US
To: Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@ist.tugraz.at>,
 guix <guix-devel@gnu.org>
Cc: Maxime Devos <maximedevos@telenet.be>,
 Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@gmail.com>
References: <2284386.8hzESeGDPO@bastet>
 <3147250c1695e9ff0885cec9b2ba847a31071bb1.camel@ist.tugraz.at>
From: Philip McGrath <philip@philipmcgrath.com>
In-Reply-To: <3147250c1695e9ff0885cec9b2ba847a31071bb1.camel@ist.tugraz.at>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=66.111.4.27;
 envelope-from=philip@philipmcgrath.com; helo=out3-smtp.messagingengine.com
X-Spam_score_int: -65
X-Spam_score: -6.6
X-Spam_bar: ------
X-Spam_report: (-6.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1,
 DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-3.766,
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001,
 SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Spam_action: no action
X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
 <guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
 <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
 <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org>
X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN
X-Migadu-To: larch@yhetil.org
X-Migadu-Country: US
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org;
	s=key1; t=1664181347;
	h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:
	 message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:
	 content-type:content-type:
	 content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:
	 in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:list-id:list-help:
	 list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature;
	bh=D/0CoSCMSq9sBCuwNLjch68BMmpPRf4pTyX1pgCVsYY=;
	b=S1N7oBk9QHmtX3v3gSEhiVoqt3kkVzDmjMYXqBhB1nsZDwgRz5tE8EJuRfPA7C9WmPJQKO
	02Kj2LreJ3C8m0z/5ndLHGf/4xRE49YBkwKIPa4bZy0wxDDjKcjkJ/d6NAR9Bg4IcvydfO
	6AzI61kNU2eZg8SiV0v7SnIE/hrjDNPKLCDz1imz5ZwV/5NGNhmayIPkCW1obYOtwy98X4
	5if7I0cwdM4umYDgjDtX53Z/553CW27OqrcUw+3uHkvW1aDEPTji73tqK/7iMFPzP3z6F4
	o4/AWLuwoPfYd+Ksg5hR9uBagqBBQMj/OCfaPT3NrHdtwXKeJBIUT0RGNfJ9Ow==
ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1664181347; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none;
	b=VSYIUauuPduTsirH9VahZsRg9kZv6CKHiQzwuLKL2SEoASWaq57ME39UWvpPSReMD8L8d4
	qs+/+rcGVIxP/mlMMi9VdqLZdKniSDq7kXhA+0haMY4tQ+Rr8FBp8LdjArpAx0LS59yKQL
	nnxMtPt5uXTXRuxwtRccvowyPhEIOfI0cbqPqd2Hzg+LGwDZhSggoW09b/kX6JeLg+ipZD
	fvIu11E0rFhDMMbHlHG3pG9OPesiRJcJMsOZV5lKMT5PQnuI9K95P3Ljx20riLDSe8H+Ua
	hxqqQdicubErA31Mb8nOAx2r0X5ltsP5AoJqGeeWpbwPL/mBTzHzIwYY/3cNIg==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1;
	aspmx1.migadu.com;
	dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=philipmcgrath.com header.s=fm2 header.b=MAxvw+Bs;
	dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm2 header.b="D TwTi3h";
	dmarc=none;
	spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"
X-Migadu-Spam-Score: 5.26
Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com;
	dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=philipmcgrath.com header.s=fm2 header.b=MAxvw+Bs;
	dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm2 header.b="D TwTi3h";
	dmarc=none;
	spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"
X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 9EA5FC696
X-Spam-Score: 5.26
X-Migadu-Scanner: scn1.migadu.com
X-TUID: wLdkH+YBCK7A

Hi,

On 9/19/22 03:07, Liliana Marie Prikler wrote:
> Am Sonntag, dem 18.09.2022 um 20:13 -0400 schrieb Philip McGrath:
>> On the other hand, even Nix puts '/bin/sh' at its usual path: we
>> are really quite an outlier in this respect. (IIUC, Nix also has 
>> '/usr/bin/env', but no other utilities at FHS paths.)
> We are not.  We provide both /bin/sh and /usr/bin/env.  If you're 
> talking about the build container then that's a much smaller 
> distinction.
> 

Yes, I'm talking about the build container. But for the build container,
programs/libraries that use "/bin/sh" would work unmodified.

>> More broadly, I now think it would be better in we embedded zero 
>> references to copies of Bash in libc.
> I don't think we can do that without breaking system.
> 

When "/bin/sh" is not available at runtime, I think libc's `system`
ought to return 127, and other `system`-like functions should raise
exceptions or whatever the idiomatic way is to signal failure. Of
course, we will presumably need to make "/bin/sh" available in many more
places, but don't think it's surprising for programs that need to run
shell commands to fail in the absence of a shell.

>> However, giving every program using Glibc a hard dependency on 
>> Bash—and on a particular Bash executable—seems like a much bigger 
>> imposition.
> We're talking 1.7 MiB here.  Certainly a "big" imposition, but
> nothing in comparison to the things you need in the store for
> bootstrapping purposes.  Also note that bash-minimal, while only
> taking up 1.0 MiB for itself, requires both glibc and gcc:lib, which
> apart from creating a cycle does blow up its closure size quite a
> bit.
> 

I'm less concerned with the literal size than with the significance of
putting a specific shell so near the root of most dependency graphs: I
tried to give examples in my reply to Maxime, like creating containers
without a shell.

>>> In versions of glibc before 2.1.3, [...] system() always returned
>>> 1 [...].
> Note that always returning non-zero is required by POSIX 2017.
> 

To quote the whole paragraph from
<https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/functions/system.html>:

> Note that, system(NULL) is required to return non-zero, indicating
> that there is a command language interpreter. At first glance, this
> would seem to conflict with the ISO C standard which allows
> system(NULL) to return zero. There is no conflict, however. A system
> must have a command language interpreter, and is non-conforming if
> none is present. It is therefore permissible for the system()
> function on such a system to implement the behavior specified by the
> ISO C standard as long as it is understood that the implementation
> does not conform to POSIX.1-2017 if system(NULL) returns zero.

I understand that to mean that `system(NULL)` returning zero indicates 
that the program is not (currently) running in a POSIX.1-2017 
environment. Guix creates many environments that do not conform to 
POSIX.1-2017: for example, any environment without `vi`.

-Philip