From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] gnu: Add lrzip. Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 22:31:55 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20160721202430.31332-1-me@tobias.gr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48181) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bQKdY-0002BG-4L for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 16:32:04 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bQKdX-0004YX-9W for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 16:32:04 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20160721202430.31332-1-me@tobias.gr> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: guix-devel@gnu.org Cc: Guix-devel Talking to myself, On 2016-07-21 22:24, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice wrote: > + (native-inputs > + `(,@(if (string-prefix? "i686" (or (%current-target-system) > + (%current-system))) > + `(("nasm" ,nasm)) > + '()) Hmm. Not sure where this falls on the ‘let the code speak for itself’ to ‘should have added a comment’ scale. Guess I'll wait for another review + patch or a very friendly committer. Kind regards, T G-R