From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:303:e16b::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms13.migadu.com with LMTPS id YFxkFmhF22ZtLwEA62LTzQ:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 06 Sep 2024 18:09:44 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:303:e16b::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1.migadu.com with LMTPS id YFxkFmhF22ZtLwEA62LTzQ (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 06 Sep 2024 20:09:44 +0200 X-Envelope-To: larch@yhetil.org Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=famulari.name header.s=mesmtp header.b="I Lx6wut"; dkim=pass header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm1 header.b=WwmLNS8L; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=none ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1725646184; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=LlNClEQ5pSPy/dKvDQhIyj/AzPTBA439z7AxG+2DEPY=; b=P88YQ4Ch/Ij0D967Nd69ioe0KGfD4XIgTVODhOmqbrw+dvhb7cfKHE5romkrJ14TUXspYq bf3OhPtdSsM3b0ERsxuNVQ58JuIG/dgXyNGVMrCRp1QM4L9tylS1Gy9ddlpIuw99zbSZxw sPIHWVIABsB/2sV4ubyWXVOX95B+PLf6Bq6ibazpbrNrKPSvdAzA2M8U8p+YhIqK/TPZ7R x6AjAEZrb9PLIOq+r9011jrPi9Ct5mWf93I6quRmWtE3k9YJmjwtCEbaq4BYWr0vmq8E08 B2qhQY777QAeDa4eyG/hTkc0rqoYCoCbwN6IV5rLhPsT3HkilFSiG1YVuNw9Tg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=famulari.name header.s=mesmtp header.b="I Lx6wut"; dkim=pass header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm1 header.b=WwmLNS8L; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=none ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1725646184; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=UNVZsDLOLTdGm2yECFuk5uOgtaeiplIQIa+cNVM7KtjedxArFLLk3zJwvjVvYx7hzSzcmY bLeSB6b0WG5LD2JlMNEp1gSuRQTO9DtFiP1U+yLcqDW8ewkfUciVVtWpQMetyNhF0Fal7i Vr+5ADLZqbjRrPBXyYLrqYxlTq/zN3JkfHxRyUOgnRHni8xfmDEhjRB6NM6z9z6AZLdSC3 YO/GoJyvPHuGXDDau37fhWw+Jba22DNMb8nZLNiMamuK1YzjP9WZwOe7+0P+bQCNHsu//o xqU9yfa3VM2FsT/1hdW8BDxH4VOHR75KcEfAPZvS894fMxtwsMWdiPJEuQQpmg== Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF8AF747CD for ; Fri, 06 Sep 2024 20:09:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1smdMr-00019a-OV; Fri, 06 Sep 2024 14:07:38 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1smdMb-0000xn-Eh for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Sep 2024 14:07:17 -0400 Received: from fhigh1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([103.168.172.152]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1smdMY-00054w-33; Fri, 06 Sep 2024 14:07:16 -0400 Received: from phl-compute-10.internal (phl-compute-10.phl.internal [10.202.2.50]) by mailfhigh.phl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BBB51140183; Fri, 6 Sep 2024 14:06:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: from phl-mailfrontend-02 ([10.202.2.163]) by phl-compute-10.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 06 Sep 2024 14:06:39 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:subject:subject:to:to; s=mesmtp; t=1725645999; x= 1725732399; bh=LlNClEQ5pSPy/dKvDQhIyj/AzPTBA439z7AxG+2DEPY=; b=I Lx6wutz5ZSMxLsZFsIziXJUvEU2YtSUq4dFn/3fegEFwFaijvmxb5Pvu80nUd/Fg edRifkQduuGbTWvjcWCGkQwBX8CR2N0bxfNwMq456x8TTpHaYyu1lgrPQU5NJxcV dEiNrpBv1cRkVZR58qPl7aNnprbzf6txfi0vUbLvfU= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to :to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= fm1; t=1725645999; x=1725732399; bh=LlNClEQ5pSPy/dKvDQhIyj/AzPTB A439z7AxG+2DEPY=; b=WwmLNS8L8xi5S6LFlIqtqlbrVhEyxpMmgHxbHq33gMZK AP0cevNobos2sYimMBA703f6KquzW0AmtfudX2zzSLVfNyVXn8OVJHCMYD/ZZ6gs Thk0+tViicorSsHkGohX+myeo/1DV1C3smoH/mpBi76jU9yQ2GcwkRmRVOLjDbkG qUGQVuRdE3LnYvoJgmkw/AoWRaQwe0IQUg4fG248usjDhGCvhPWzDSHUEbA8HX+s vZ+fr/EUhPKxlI0pZXhBnZWdffidLVravJlAw0unUKBkJdOx/CrKHirznbTPjSRG pDrQ/dKJNB4nCIXnbsoo8+/AxhUywnQ9GQ6UMaTI8w== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeeftddrudeiuddguddvvdcutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpggftfghnshhusghstghrihgsvgdp uffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivg hnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenucfjughrpeffhffvvefukfhfgggtuggjsehttdertddttddv necuhfhrohhmpefnvghoucfhrghmuhhlrghrihcuoehlvghosehfrghmuhhlrghrihdrnh grmhgvqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeelleeukeegtefhffffiefhkefhfefgueffieej hfevkedtgfejledtgfffvdeuieenucffohhmrghinhepghhithdrihhnnecuvehluhhsth gvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomheplhgvohesfhgrmhhulhgr rhhirdhnrghmvgdpnhgspghrtghpthhtohepgedpmhhouggvpehsmhhtphhouhhtpdhrtg hpthhtohepvhgrghhrrghnthesuggvsghirghnrdhorhhgpdhrtghpthhtoheplhhuugho sehgnhhurdhorhhgpdhrtghpthhtohepiihimhhonhdrthhouhhtohhunhgvsehgmhgrih hlrdgtohhmpdhrtghpthhtohepghhuihigqdguvghvvghlsehgnhhurdhorhhg X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i819c4023:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Fri, 6 Sep 2024 14:06:38 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2024 14:06:37 -0400 From: Leo Famulari To: Vagrant Cascadian Cc: Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?= , Simon Tournier , guix-devel Subject: Re: =?utf-8?B?4oCYY29yZS11cGRhdGVz4oCZIGlz?= =?utf-8?Q?_gone=3B_long_live_=E2=80=98core-packages-team=E2=80=99!?= Message-ID: References: <87le0cj13e.fsf@inria.fr> <87v7zby3r6.fsf@gmail.com> <87zfol170t.fsf@gnu.org> <87y144oew9.fsf@wireframe> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87y144oew9.fsf@wireframe> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=103.168.172.152; envelope-from=leo@famulari.name; helo=fhigh1-smtp.messagingengine.com X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Queue-Id: EF8AF747CD X-Migadu-Scanner: mx13.migadu.com X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -8.68 X-Spam-Score: -8.68 X-TUID: U8J9TxS3BiwS On Fri, Sep 06, 2024 at 10:44:54AM -0700, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > Is it just me, or is rebasing branches disconcerting, as it likely means > the person signing the commit is not necessarily the original person > pushing the commit? This is worst for the now deprecated core-updates > branch with many rebased commits... are people still updating the > signed-off-by tags or whatnot? In Guix, the "signed-off-by" tag gives credit to the reviewer of the patch, but doesn't indicate anything about authority to push to guix.git. In all cases, a commit that is pushed to guix.git will be signed by an authorized committer. The signature system ensures that. If we are concerned about long-running branches being rebased and commits losing their "original" signatures, I think it's not really something to worry about. That's because the signature *only* tells us that that the commit was signed by someone who is authorized, and it tells us *nothing* else. The code-signing authorization is extremely limited in scope. It doesn't tell us that the code works, is freely licensed, is not malicious, etc. So, it doesn't matter who signs a commit, as long as it is signed by an authorized person. Does this respond to your concerns? Or have I misunderstood?