From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:303:e224::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms13.migadu.com with LMTPS id eCuTBVj7qGZsVgEAqHPOHw:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 30 Jul 2024 14:40:24 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:303:e224::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0.migadu.com with LMTPS id eCuTBVj7qGZsVgEAqHPOHw (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 30 Jul 2024 16:40:24 +0200 X-Envelope-To: larch@yhetil.org Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=famulari.name header.s=mesmtp header.b="F OzfDRQ"; dkim=pass header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm3 header.b=PzkYx6AD; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1722350424; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=K7nJDtFQUyrb7lFY6KI6h7/F5e719oHZGR6a5X5Kwew=; b=leFcHHaavbnr6uIDrQg2RFv9+popcmIBJdSb7uVF/tWs9Vzfw3kuEUzTvXSzbr+58vRRsy i+h2JuxR3cliNjGmOS0oKh3I9CqAhzUMdFTO7dD0mCEzj2wQwRXABHlZK/AU0JzaTK1NY4 H2jlGqcid56J24ctPy+6C2Bbc4jEKpJ5oFEGzfpa+IhVnctmJ414AlQVwqFKtDu105MhxQ 0RJWZwAyuAl2nqyAO2Byt9fjYeoTMa5kCof9tKOGaqtGljlkjR6mU1tqm1pl8DJ9P/v4Mg VoRAGNmKauvvA125cJcFv155EYOj0/V6UFuLetL14rKSliupW3j1DGbTU4xGdw== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1722350424; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=k5Gk3H/CVUOW4Iuk7wBw4fyeTYCVxMCCCzvBpaoZ0FDutGtND0POo1x+DVdQvr88LbUtGM iJv0pPTpKowPeFSUvxRxqCJFD3j3by7jGht0QuJ7//dn4ZKrQExqSC8m1bqx/IwgnGkCHy id0oQv6Z3hpzoBOxWN+E3vwk0/++WPpEgTnTAVKvcWZOeCgg7y4VGqOmQhX3RXBQ1VznMn /YobLnK1mOvPfyJxR+1l/dD5NJmT+8cSvp1RNKu3NOkElINDHYsiy8oC2SYOPTUhyYbmXn e1lMbeb4blOofaURKNNKqeXDPLCluzK61lci2Gqu/G8+HIiilIb2tC56SIgcXQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=famulari.name header.s=mesmtp header.b="F OzfDRQ"; dkim=pass header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm3 header.b=PzkYx6AD; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6476A612A2 for ; Tue, 30 Jul 2024 16:40:23 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sYo0w-0004YQ-2a; Tue, 30 Jul 2024 10:39:46 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sYo0t-0004Xp-4G for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Jul 2024 10:39:43 -0400 Received: from fout2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([103.168.172.145]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sYo0r-0006RP-3Z for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Jul 2024 10:39:42 -0400 Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailfout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5F141380179; Tue, 30 Jul 2024 10:39:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 30 Jul 2024 10:39:39 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:subject:subject:to:to; s=mesmtp; t=1722350379; x= 1722436779; bh=K7nJDtFQUyrb7lFY6KI6h7/F5e719oHZGR6a5X5Kwew=; b=F OzfDRQIGXQEV9Ucvkh6sCit6aD0fpjhSV2FvevVuy0tKnZEM2jb5YhQNeWyaMhCo oUT7h9oR+qsT2M8b3w/5NhkDFqOXAuljKYlIj2QFjYq8lC8ImFrklMynYQeRO8CE QQKViAAHsb0RPcc/dHFggl+9oZttuqIeNJIXPKDWTQ= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to :to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= fm3; t=1722350379; x=1722436779; bh=K7nJDtFQUyrb7lFY6KI6h7/F5e71 9oHZGR6a5X5Kwew=; b=PzkYx6ADtq514bSGF8rGVSf50ZG9f1fRbrn1y5DEVNhR b3XbNUsT7BrrkhXbi2NRo6IED6UzoUenysAIbVBzEQoWIys1M3yPwSPrY8f0K3Ft U9voHMNZHrr6jI693ep0gTLAU+IVlz8ngBuyoM5EdiAQN6vzPYj3IFA+aTwSkKIP ALYMweJno7NQACiDQBHZl+aKTnFVDPR1/MRdbbx6heLjX3wOR1kCLrQKY/+ssbC0 WDCoB80Bjc0JlsehhZ3g/JyYFa/2rxHwpf2oGXhj5MFiN0U1x7qkNYCO0QUPOuw+ 2AEKlySg5OXufFoEG73VS77XMam8v0ABK3Etilx9jw== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeeftddrjeeggdektdcutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpeffhffvvefukfhfgggtuggjsehttdertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefnvghoucfh rghmuhhlrghrihcuoehlvghosehfrghmuhhlrghrihdrnhgrmhgvqeenucggtffrrghtth gvrhhnpeetheeuvdeivdelueeukefhtdeihedtgefhvddvlefhudejudeiheelfeevteeu hfenucffohhmrghinhepghhnuhdrohhrghenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurf grrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehlvghosehfrghmuhhlrghrihdrnhgrmhgvpdhnsggp rhgtphhtthhopedt X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i819c4023:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Tue, 30 Jul 2024 10:39:38 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2024 10:39:36 -0400 From: Leo Famulari To: Richard Sent Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, Ricardo Wurmus , 67535@debbugs.gnu.org, Efraim Flashner Subject: Re: Does anyone use i686-linux? [was Re: bug#67535: ci.guix.gnu.org 'Cannot allocate memory' while building for i686-linux] Message-ID: References: <87sevsxtqg.fsf@elephly.net> <87v80n8yiy.fsf@freakingpenguin.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87v80n8yiy.fsf@freakingpenguin.com> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=103.168.172.145; envelope-from=leo@famulari.name; helo=fout2-smtp.messagingengine.com X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 6476A612A2 X-Migadu-Scanner: mx12.migadu.com X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -10.12 X-Spam-Score: -10.12 X-TUID: CIR0zn1xm6gs I basically agree with you :) On Mon, Jul 29, 2024 at 09:21:57PM -0400, Richard Sent wrote: > Breaking changes are okay, and if we consider this too niche of a use > case or too high of a maintenance burden it should be dropped. I do > believe it should progress into the consideration stage instead of being > discarded outright. It's not really a maintenance burden, at least for me as a person that helps with the kernel packages. They get updated automatically as part of our work updating the kernels for more popular systems. But after years of watching the i686 kernel packages fail to build, I'm wondering if the project should be attempting these builds.