From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:303:e16b::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms13.migadu.com with LMTPS id yBBpJx41rWbcCAEAe85BDQ:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 02 Aug 2024 19:35:58 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:303:e16b::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2.migadu.com with LMTPS id yBBpJx41rWbcCAEAe85BDQ (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 02 Aug 2024 21:35:58 +0200 X-Envelope-To: larch@yhetil.org Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=debbugs.gnu.org header.s=debbugs-gnu-org header.b="Wff6vQ/I"; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=riseup.net header.s=squak header.b=S6nJr6t6; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed), DKIM not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=riseup.net (policy=none) ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1722627358; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:resent-cc: resent-from:resent-sender:resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=zhomHxlDlriGwm0QXgOuoUfojCJi3ncrFya2I3AKJVM=; b=sYgH/Pkmn822QfPx41sk8k2B63bv7HQBk+kekM+j72BgwOwxXr0wbPiLg6MQDw4qfMrXfo hYcPRJBjem39fex09l1CdBpSV8B9Y3zKJ01sP2mVFJGM8oIa5ixdIyK1mAHOIgkoWpJ5/e a1G0G26GK6PT6XB5p/FrB/TCQ9p003Y9tc78FeA4rOFcZv/vKgQaqR5DDX6E9F+lxtWThW 9BwYfxS1SeSbDza4M4+XLk6kRfRS+jgFWBZiVQbQcf7zgsERbUl/fnzEE9cdtHn8tP4jzb mhp5C2O51OZYWNuvpPmwCvwsUgmkwi1ajLYu0w/EGk2sqjwJqKeEiyEKy7uT6w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=debbugs.gnu.org header.s=debbugs-gnu-org header.b="Wff6vQ/I"; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=riseup.net header.s=squak header.b=S6nJr6t6; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed), DKIM not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=riseup.net (policy=none) ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1722627358; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=YiOla10GO3skeqVZfKrneU/Bu10nKoJaLtYnead4TuFV9EE8x9YZHvF2skneFpzo43l1Yw FN2xNxpcffCJs06k0bV9N4cnOIoLSXSFhSC9XDTdxRabztPdxV1SeFZUOFNTBMWV14KEvz znr56LOJUu+/z0/SNvmVUq/FRJcK2gzxS6BzPoLm5R3PUi7ukN0uMb4FheSTrucppXhRmI 8+7P6XZDHt3o9XPiDopfQZ86s4yUieLZb9XAIIwdDZv1yd52cx7HqORWGBEwPR/+UqcP8L VmVwvZmaK6PzU9fO3C9LTFezKL/fEOoB5S08qi5EWpStELbp7M0/A82e/269sg== Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6043E55351 for ; Fri, 2 Aug 2024 21:35:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sZy41-0001F8-Bx; Fri, 02 Aug 2024 15:35:45 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sZy3z-0001Ek-BT for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Aug 2024 15:35:43 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sZy3z-0005n1-1W for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Aug 2024 15:35:43 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=debbugs.gnu.org; s=debbugs-gnu-org; h=In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References:From:Date:To:Subject; bh=zhomHxlDlriGwm0QXgOuoUfojCJi3ncrFya2I3AKJVM=; b=Wff6vQ/IyjlAV6TOYkK+rktw+asXx8EinKMNL4c9Tr2OF8NJdVqYV8RvWBfSsI+FE2x75TyYUnroBdtsGQs+0SMibePSs4opwzT9SJrAbStV/Xv8A9BPbik/gByidGeg6m+aOS/tMjnWx9d8tbmBC+/grkKOZNZPCvSCWThsFRontMaLsAdWGHaolSXFrEK9778PKUHDpcXbSLZ3pLRDNeUlTiKCJcNNFKgUCKKNYmM465LFkq8cjiGYv7qZQV8TGK5XwPWveEeOTBCHfNmg2xu25wrHp0jPw/EEw8C8UbyiAjwxtEzJ6iJ+/BknJW40vCey4utuV29cHNSRa02wcg==; Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1sZy4H-0002Bh-KS for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Aug 2024 15:36:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#67535: Does anyone use i686-linux? [was Re: bug#67535: ci.guix.gnu.org 'Cannot allocate memory' while building for i686-linux] Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?Andr=C3=A9?= Batista Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2024 19:36:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 67535 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Leo Famulari Cc: Ricardo Wurmus , guix-devel@gnu.org, 67535@debbugs.gnu.org, Efraim Flashner Received: via spool by 67535-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B67535.17226273108302 (code B ref 67535); Fri, 02 Aug 2024 19:36:01 +0000 Received: (at 67535) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Aug 2024 19:35:10 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53762 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1sZy3S-00029o-7j for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 02 Aug 2024 15:35:10 -0400 Received: from mx0.riseup.net ([198.252.153.6]:42404) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1sZy3N-000292-Hy for 67535@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 02 Aug 2024 15:35:08 -0400 Received: from fews02-sea.riseup.net (fews02-sea-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.112]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx0.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4WbGHj1skJz9wsc; Fri, 2 Aug 2024 19:34:41 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak; t=1722627281; bh=agkjMZ5Iyn7eDJjRcIcqny+d7320T9EMKg9s+Ovc9GM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=S6nJr6t6OoSpMRgza7L26B2Z9vAFGGnwBGXAy/BOMdE21ZDBSx81MmmRE+4NyN/s/ ltwszkw4XCFlf1+C9orvWOWJYzZk2gdNVRgezAyWHa4UKzH2PZVIvHHhuoLMdP4Bpb 3US8UJCVd408DTFDzyP4u5GeKaFfr6NdKD/XU8jM= X-Riseup-User-ID: DCC0B28987143A1020CEA5B0CF92E4A7E34A803459109FD55AB437AC2D4532A1 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fews02-sea.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4WbGHg5qxkzFsTy; Fri, 2 Aug 2024 19:34:39 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2024 16:34:31 -0300 From: =?UTF-8?Q?Andr=C3=A9?= Batista Message-ID: References: <87sevsxtqg.fsf@elephly.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 6043E55351 X-Migadu-Scanner: mx13.migadu.com X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -9.98 X-Spam-Score: -9.98 X-TUID: egbQIsX7q8eo Hi qui 01 ago 2024 às 16:12:18 (1722539538), leo@famulari.name enviou: > On Tue, Jul 30, 2024 at 06:02:23PM -0300, André Batista wrote: > > seg 29 jul 2024 às 14:33:59 (1722274439), rekado@elephly.net enviou: > > > FWIW, I'm using one of those Atom chips in a netbook for an installation > > > of Sugar Desktop. I upgrade it every few months or so. If I'm the only > > > user of i686-linux I would not want to condemn the project to supporting > > > the architecture for my sake. > > > > For the record, I'm another one still using those atom netbooks. Most > > software that I use on that machine still builds and runs fine, with the > > occasional hiccup. > > > > But even though I use the arch, I also don't feel particularly inclined > > to fix the occasional errors and can understand if people here decide to > > drop support to it. > > Thanks for chiming in Ricardo and André. Do you build your own kernels > for these machines? Or wait for the occasional successful build from CI? > Download substitutes from a different build farm? I build my own kernels tailored for that machine so I did not notice that substitutes were not available. I usually keep pace with whatever is the latest stable kernel until it goes eol or, if it is a lts, until the latest stable reaches x.x.3 or x.x.4 minor version. Currently it is on v. 6.9.12. I've not had any issues building kernels to it in a long time, but I do use two local offload builders that are x84_64. None of them have more than 8 cores though.