From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:303:e224::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms13.migadu.com with LMTPS id 8HZEE8ZEnWZZuwAAqHPOHw:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 21 Jul 2024 17:26:30 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:303:e224::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0.migadu.com with LMTPS id 8HZEE8ZEnWZZuwAAqHPOHw (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 21 Jul 2024 19:26:30 +0200 X-Envelope-To: larch@yhetil.org Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=wolfsden.cz header.s=mail header.b=rFd064w7; dkim=pass header.d=wolfsden.cz header.s=mail header.b=rFd064w7; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=wolfsden.cz; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1721582790; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=xIkL0pQLjj7HD5qcjaLJrA0v3jGx026GXv84z9qRvSw=; b=EdDr22v385LgxJ7z1XLAzsWeHRuAWV+uBSKJsKFw+zHPuyqYZ4wl/XUX0NQGdPbhIU1kBv 7wgUomyEDJeg0nLIcV+k3G0S8MBGuGfYznyob6LnFmzXR9nxzWfvNyQAxEnuTUBj/VftK0 K9lHek6mVn2ZSvVBt5+u1xti2od7UMB0xbEjHUjSAMqME6ZE+QUu/eWF03HUMq8recw7xH U95jfMzDXUY/Q0KHW3lNeX1F4d7gallqDLe94CBqofK53Gs06y3ZC8rvEAkzhmOz1BwCTg yAMvQWr5rfmrBAmj8V4mE5xAxdZhClurBN/u1rNcUBq8XWURvyiYhDOCVyylpg== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1721582790; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=U3A/p2zLAUw4iCOEfxTVbghNEhYi5sNjp9z55027GLSsWRgCckWAefF2vqp+Djt+WNgZ8N iIFddmesJPiZLIHOdV1foVAMQ6vF0gBRLp6BuapHcN3Ig2kIJLMlac7C37wTo6A5Fzk6aX i06J1pZ0tCMbBmzKUlypUa0HEjlioZBNa40IwbtIWAb0hmzzquFKhNwUYEpycfaZzdpVN1 nlapzP+7fmyiL1UWkTL03bgzx7u3//XTnOrmw6SmtlgoFPkKeEY5nhmkgdHUgZeaRZvP9m XsgCzCIFA+6YEQJMh3P5vVVv1BEQIraV/DwyIYGZPdJF0FzPRSDir4cjRpHgog== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=wolfsden.cz header.s=mail header.b=rFd064w7; dkim=pass header.d=wolfsden.cz header.s=mail header.b=rFd064w7; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=wolfsden.cz; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B247561E27 for ; Sun, 21 Jul 2024 19:26:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sVaJo-0000oN-H0; Sun, 21 Jul 2024 13:25:56 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <~@wolfsden.cz>) id 1sVaJn-0000o7-La for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Jul 2024 13:25:55 -0400 Received: from wolfsden.cz ([37.205.8.62]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <~@wolfsden.cz>) id 1sVaJl-00066X-J0; Sun, 21 Jul 2024 13:25:55 -0400 Received: by wolfsden.cz (Postfix, from userid 104) id D27C82895F7; Sun, 21 Jul 2024 17:25:47 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=wolfsden.cz; s=mail; t=1721582747; bh=NzVQKq2yRdCm21VYa0WpfLvUT/FdXgheujCGtEbC0K0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=rFd064w7hINk2NePO7RsynpspqyTscEFBHX+fXdF+WWADDk8xreQDsfaXf+qfuAld 4QCh5iF+Yh9k0W1qNzvgZ91b3Z88lxdcyWF/gdGiXla7gCRHVjpcq3fhNJncX0lqwN Bxr04UPD2RBbLIsl0BDXln9Rfp2MDAaKIkWUuEed9JFD36ZwokfnMcId8/fxF4u1oJ Zvns8PPaPvWlghKT0MZIbxWACV58qagQ5ch5Bw5RjVpEN0gUSIT0r4D1HXurOTSd39 ROpoUxlhZWTyr+jKsT8R31LYjG+d4hFQaUPYeTufg0Ihmo5qdvmzZk9f4fIeVnGmaJ /0vFTHnNHSC5bnttiZznRTUOYkkQ5J9mKOjKph2ByXdKf8WV2C9ffJOJM1rHNGCw73 Ju2UyfZDiKVtpxjzw0rPfqlDbFTcjtEr0qzNxG0hPohXmKEFwiU+FhS6zxyAvSm0uB z8m1+Z8VdKFjstvNy2Qb9qjLO4wkPswS2dyVmX3RNisozr+RtT37YbY40nICKUGw62 U0KxgFX4txIo2RDhtUtvFXfQyFrcMuQNkVgF/fl8Di9qiTjIcSdctEcnUfzn5iHdcL hxLRCOc5bHjK26JvZX48MBXOflSqwb1H1IfYDXcihllzhAy4PNOcIguTzh9PGmCTFV tEiiv6W3gQNHzYIgI1rbqIPQ= Received: from localhost (unknown [81.17.16.68]) by wolfsden.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DF0BB28ACAD; Sun, 21 Jul 2024 17:25:46 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=wolfsden.cz; s=mail; t=1721582747; bh=NzVQKq2yRdCm21VYa0WpfLvUT/FdXgheujCGtEbC0K0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=rFd064w7hINk2NePO7RsynpspqyTscEFBHX+fXdF+WWADDk8xreQDsfaXf+qfuAld 4QCh5iF+Yh9k0W1qNzvgZ91b3Z88lxdcyWF/gdGiXla7gCRHVjpcq3fhNJncX0lqwN Bxr04UPD2RBbLIsl0BDXln9Rfp2MDAaKIkWUuEed9JFD36ZwokfnMcId8/fxF4u1oJ Zvns8PPaPvWlghKT0MZIbxWACV58qagQ5ch5Bw5RjVpEN0gUSIT0r4D1HXurOTSd39 ROpoUxlhZWTyr+jKsT8R31LYjG+d4hFQaUPYeTufg0Ihmo5qdvmzZk9f4fIeVnGmaJ /0vFTHnNHSC5bnttiZznRTUOYkkQ5J9mKOjKph2ByXdKf8WV2C9ffJOJM1rHNGCw73 Ju2UyfZDiKVtpxjzw0rPfqlDbFTcjtEr0qzNxG0hPohXmKEFwiU+FhS6zxyAvSm0uB z8m1+Z8VdKFjstvNy2Qb9qjLO4wkPswS2dyVmX3RNisozr+RtT37YbY40nICKUGw62 U0KxgFX4txIo2RDhtUtvFXfQyFrcMuQNkVgF/fl8Di9qiTjIcSdctEcnUfzn5iHdcL hxLRCOc5bHjK26JvZX48MBXOflSqwb1H1IfYDXcihllzhAy4PNOcIguTzh9PGmCTFV tEiiv6W3gQNHzYIgI1rbqIPQ= Date: Sun, 21 Jul 2024 19:25:46 +0200 From: Tomas Volf <~@wolfsden.cz> To: Vincent Legoll Cc: Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?= , Sergio Pastor =?iso-8859-1?Q?P=E9rez?= , guix-devel@gnu.org Subject: Re: Should we document how to detect if build machines are reachable before trying to offload? Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: Vincent Legoll , Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?= , Sergio Pastor =?iso-8859-1?Q?P=E9rez?= , guix-devel@gnu.org References: <87plrk2rad.fsf@gnu.org> <87v80yoqcp.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="0hsJxOpcihGIkr6H" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Received-SPF: pass client-ip=37.205.8.62; envelope-from=~@wolfsden.cz; helo=wolfsden.cz X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Queue-Id: B247561E27 X-Migadu-Scanner: mx12.migadu.com X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -9.06 X-Spam-Score: -9.06 X-TUID: P+3y4Oq6yK55 --0hsJxOpcihGIkr6H Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2024-07-21 16:26:41 +0000, Vincent Legoll wrote: > Hello, > > On Sun, Jul 21, 2024 at 12:57=E2=80=AFPM Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: > > > I guess this is probably what we should permit: building locally when we > > cannot offload. > > > > Does that make sense? > > > > What about making "build locally" not a special case, but just "offloading > to > localhost" ? That will not work without reworking (fixing) the offload mechanism. (Some= ?) flags are currently ignored for offload (--check, --rounds, ...), but you w= ant to have them working at least locally when you need them. > > Maybe as an implicit default, so that it would work naturally as today. > > And with some way to deny it for people who don't want to build locally > at all, whatever their reason might be. > > Would that trim some "build locally"-specific code ? > > Is that already how it's done ? > > Is the idea crazy / dumb ? No, I like it in general, if nothing else it would put the offload code on critical path, ensuring it fully works. I wonder what are the downsides (I am sure there are some). > > -- > Vincent Legoll Tomas -- There are only two hard things in Computer Science: cache invalidation, naming things and off-by-one errors. --0hsJxOpcihGIkr6H Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEt4NJs4wUfTYpiGikL7/ufbZ/wakFAmadRJoACgkQL7/ufbZ/ wam3kQ/7BfPJMzGdC6fyoFnQ3lS4VJi0cakcuj3gEtojL4ZExBFCdT80Tn97RQ3V pVU5fJxP35TxWdqGyaKnIpq5hWPerQRv6cs1So7TFOgA/DGDb8l9ToQSV5t5U8fI Wq2rBbQFbhXtFzKVcNnQkeb0l+fZE3kI32NHXWPJkBFOwzHuFysSXdsjhK4Jt3CV KyvBvpDwpOO6ojF1l1UQp1QXHTYlCf0PDyFkm7NDjOeMVJ92ppyDDQnleN9g1lsM yh3z/usjxhr0HbnkQYJh3/ZrOkS1W1SJ2eNqVKR8MO5N/yhUfWJEiIelFVITGLYi Ayk8Y8b0KxMGvULa2A1u1FNOxGmaJ0975qJhCe217M8ts713w7+qPDTZ2m3N1wut 6lNYnaKRVtY0KnRNl0zLG0ff/Y1BedIn5GBlkADR+Qhs3TpHhLytZJV0yPm22T/v Zd3qNh0CVimvx4xR5CrgzQQRe5e2vlsBHr3R47Ozf7976Xt0j7Mexn5+hvXZomF6 pY16dXkw/zWdE87eiGBZG47Fj5fgb5tQoozwkAJps4Fg7+2SXV47oeLf5xca1gn3 Mt22NSQcjD/PMeMAVitLjL3mLeJbEd051fXg3I/S/NN2klDGSZtFwTeoS4TILITD gFMu7lMPonHvcB6yUrf6NKnZ9Ji/MEQMML5qMQP5YP/E789tAfQ= =VkON -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --0hsJxOpcihGIkr6H--