From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:303:e16b::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms13.migadu.com with LMTPS id UB3fF73gdWY8NgEA62LTzQ:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 21 Jun 2024 20:21:17 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:303:e16b::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1.migadu.com with LMTPS id UB3fF73gdWY8NgEA62LTzQ (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 21 Jun 2024 22:21:17 +0200 X-Envelope-To: larch@yhetil.org Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=none ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1719001277; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:resent-cc: resent-from:resent-sender:resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post; bh=p7WF6oZYtwCaX8n1R/JhOpZ9opPunVMX/cRHGF59Fno=; b=JnD9TF59ywBoJ0we0AF+xcEzuzacwnLNGtmy26ZJ/+HYeLJbO9Qv1u7Kn4+vxU48H449QR cbngNQOJ3AvqyBW5kUzKNEXOvGtuXUz/Cw5gBJDyRtiEEqyTbNlwVI1zam1Fr30NutroSW wftlBhA9dBiWwuIwHC7e5vnMfG2iZIouwVUWUVc0TTl+TwQTuDua7YakUQYhTnQaM9rQF+ 6eCboCYS5v3LFDrDzwqG8el7Di2Xrju/Z8cXLYXu6Wo8P0ku0tphgC82bshr/RcM0X5ets VqMMhkYTVGE3BXsfJHSUd+1XE4Qg5wZMWjAT8H0TTBKBqklJSpGisNdzQH4QWw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=none ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1719001277; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=aWijG44G/y0lVXEJkreIDmTK3M5Dv4Nu82RVJvA1XVmTU+9DHFkXKAGffZrgKDYMr+PLgw Z08kRMLY+PQKfDyhQ9YQRuzBQx8WHcp+mtmzw3Y5HF5DO/fJI8jM6iBBbdGrVGSAauA8Ga RB0H56k10NJhZUm6qkcaoW6LxdaU6c3tYvLb2d38tRtFpOPq8cpASUor12hE1aC0jf8r8W +aQPrSS9enUaT862VE4ajJsCMTF8kAmNMcerMGuvR2fThBwrpIQ6FPiQu3U1NhE1tVcaf4 WXLKCSTzlK99xZTb+WZskrRSoJv/KqlfRIOHjsFS0gMAOOzs02M9ofxNH+pXAw== Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A4D05677D for ; Fri, 21 Jun 2024 22:21:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sKkkr-0002DZ-NO; Fri, 21 Jun 2024 16:21:05 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sKkkp-0002Cz-0d for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Jun 2024 16:21:03 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sKkko-0004PU-Nz for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Jun 2024 16:21:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1sKkkn-0001V2-Tf for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Jun 2024 16:21:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#70915] Closing this bug for now? Resent-From: Andreas Enge Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2024 20:21:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 70915 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Nicolas Goaziou Cc: 70915@debbugs.gnu.org, Christopher Baines Received: via spool by 70915-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B70915.17190012195706 (code B ref 70915); Fri, 21 Jun 2024 20:21:01 +0000 Received: (at 70915) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Jun 2024 20:20:19 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43885 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1sKkk7-0001Ty-As for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 21 Jun 2024 16:20:19 -0400 Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([185.233.100.1]:36328) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1sKkk5-0001Tj-4F for 70915@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 21 Jun 2024 16:20:17 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3754474B; Fri, 21 Jun 2024 22:20:11 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at hera.aquilenet.fr Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hera.aquilenet.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id H99EsrHfwFZL; Fri, 21 Jun 2024 22:20:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: from jurong (unknown [IPv6:2001:861:c4:f2f0::c64]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8DD946F1; Fri, 21 Jun 2024 22:20:10 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2024 22:20:09 +0200 From: Andreas Enge Message-ID: References: <87r0e6w0fz.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87bk3ujc0g.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <87bk3ujc0g.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 2A4D05677D X-Migadu-Scanner: mx13.migadu.com X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -4.86 X-Spam-Score: -4.86 X-TUID: 9p7y1FIrbJ+2 Am Fri, Jun 21, 2024 at 10:07:11PM +0200 schrieb Nicolas Goaziou: > About a month ago, the branch was already ready to be merged, but it > never[¹] got the chance to be allocated the few CPU cycles necessary to > start building something. I doubt it did waste anything because I hardly > got any feedback from QA since the request for merging was issued. Well, it probably was never fully built, but it did start. I have seen packages of the tex-team branch being compiled in the past few days. The revisions corresponding to several commits were evaluated also. > > Should we close this bug for now until the branch has reached its final > > shape for the next merge? Or maybe keep it in its current shape until it > > is merged and only then add new commits? > If your suggestion means the branch will have to wait more months before > being merged, I dislike it. The branch will be ready in a few days. What > is done with this branch does not belong to me. I suppose we can manually change the priorities of the branch merge requests, but do not know how to do so myself. If we do not close this bug, maybe it would be good to not push more commits to the branch on the server until your work is finished; I am quite certain that QA works on evaluating intermediate commits. Andreas