From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:4876::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms13.migadu.com with LMTPS id kFayAoXEcGb+JwAAe85BDQ:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 17 Jun 2024 23:19:33 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:4876::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2.migadu.com with LMTPS id kFayAoXEcGb+JwAAe85BDQ (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 18 Jun 2024 01:19:33 +0200 X-Envelope-To: larch@yhetil.org Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=famulari.name header.s=mesmtp header.b="R /LXUi1"; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm1 header.b=hVL+FvZX; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=none ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1718666372; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:resent-cc:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references: list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post: dkim-signature; bh=M1UBauJ0H5Mo5spXLXPKgx2BQJhJ6+gbAkm+7w9c718=; b=sRAKwC2hX8BGm07UKQsaLhW09n4lmcx7CnYFCl51jCzW/TPhNPmgWAsIbxiGLdWGmgcgF6 O+w4te/qzzPwnndv1KE0/iSrF0PF0mWF5nT8OvrH/6YL0bv21p0JKR3S7h39XJPm7JPDHt l9edqmgovO0FJDOGqHcVd4Aa8KoyEVQas3i4k3vts3mVUcYEh/v371x4T7f8nwYQrhlBve PT1HS5Cf/+hvpTG75YkB65NEq/jnrujFAJcEAEyWj4aWkf2fWSoT2XdVuNibhnpPuM+ic4 lyUORaSP++Ij7JeYl7G++4E7a62TzVoeFFuZcAoHs7OhBSEp2Ot5+bayVztIIQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=famulari.name header.s=mesmtp header.b="R /LXUi1"; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm1 header.b=hVL+FvZX; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=none ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1718666372; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=X3iPCMvvLscSFkaD7uLDbcf8UG6sOdCDePOVHwWo00ToPd3kQXsYbU6FfcoJL2zcIoWxaH UPPBtkCqjQa0aEo/b/SH4K6LGcRu3Vp38v8Wq9F1ouuEC35k+E0KU22Vyo3itK7xo4mDlx fDLms0iR8xcNqsrg4VderNjz3PvfXBuxyvAr17X2Tx3TP7BKx0jhLrLX/wPKJYDuTDg11f yY0mBf6NZZvYLsahTi+n5I/lZDN1IHZWREDZ8Cjaz/mNI+rJ0JLqYOpg0ze2hIHhkI1T7B I5J3RklxIpTPnZMYQFKEcFEY0OaM+WDtnXXWb92fB0D7rPoA3virZmv7SpLKTw== Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A761770664 for ; Tue, 18 Jun 2024 01:19:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sJLct-0005XR-K3; Mon, 17 Jun 2024 19:19:03 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sJLcq-0005XD-7d for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jun 2024 19:19:00 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sJLcp-0007Sd-Q0 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jun 2024 19:18:59 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1sJLcr-0002cs-LJ for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jun 2024 19:19:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#71462: Default ntp service configuration not working on IPv6 network Resent-From: Leo Famulari Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2024 23:19:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 71462 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Guillaume Le Vaillant Cc: 71462@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 71462-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B71462.171866631410050 (code B ref 71462); Mon, 17 Jun 2024 23:19:01 +0000 Received: (at 71462) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Jun 2024 23:18:34 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38484 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1sJLcP-0002c1-Qf for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jun 2024 19:18:34 -0400 Received: from fout8-smtp.messagingengine.com ([103.168.172.151]:52459) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1sJLcL-0002bj-M8 for 71462@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jun 2024 19:18:32 -0400 Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailfout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id F21921380810; Mon, 17 Jun 2024 19:18:21 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 17 Jun 2024 19:18:21 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:subject:subject:to:to; s=mesmtp; t=1718666301; x= 1718752701; bh=M1UBauJ0H5Mo5spXLXPKgx2BQJhJ6+gbAkm+7w9c718=; b=R /LXUi1VOYbpEAnJX0op3l5i1+Ig/BFYjo8gVfiBEyxqipUJvc6GTpVx/LxfB2kCD qGbdzgpbu8sDjeFBvFsjIJJJInaYuwbt1efzy1yUa8RaPz0gSiOxTb5xrC/mKIA7 CtCKa5bmW9WOriDvM/dhZTM/cmnq8zebfb7hV/jzp4= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to :to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= fm1; t=1718666301; x=1718752701; bh=M1UBauJ0H5Mo5spXLXPKgx2BQJhJ 6+gbAkm+7w9c718=; b=hVL+FvZXXLAk3Zsu3D5AbbUVvp730VENA9KQwELRO3bV I/zV8FvxwdzNBaqjETXsEEgk4UmHWObxiJjH//a4im/U++OFUTKZ0KfkMpSOa3TB VZ7aMdL0xNWBErB9qUARY+GZY+KmJoyK8chaH1vhSv0MyTjiPKShlSBKvqJucNqb NW0VXjQvLwqnOwdRen0lYkUKeVSoD1lGqZ2sJkmuus/xnPyUvkhb+GZ01ihDV6Su 4h9XFLXzmSkYpZuVIbsavkSKDNvSARwU84jXk4LD3TCjxCFOfhYy/c57LPlmflhr 1YkTQSvp89AubP+xcAP0uViNLfpAjoU317ErDRbVYA== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvledrfedviedgvddtucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpeffhffvvefukfhfgggtuggjsehttd ertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefnvghoucfhrghmuhhlrghrihcuoehlvghosehfrghmuhhl rghrihdrnhgrmhgvqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpefffeefgefhteeukeekleeugedvhe fggffgteeggfdvudefhfekffetvddtjeeiieenucffohhmrghinhepnhhtphdrohhrghdp nhhtphhpohholhdrohhrghenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmh grihhlfhhrohhmpehlvghosehfrghmuhhlrghrihdrnhgrmhgv X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i819c4023:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Mon, 17 Jun 2024 19:18:21 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2024 19:18:20 -0400 From: Leo Famulari Message-ID: References: <87ikyhfbdj.fsf@kitej> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87ikyhfbdj.fsf@kitej> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Spam-Score: -2.46 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: A761770664 X-Migadu-Scanner: mx10.migadu.com X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -2.46 X-TUID: dmXeQP2eYdaJ On Mon, Jun 10, 2024 at 08:30:32AM +0000, Guillaume Le Vaillant wrote: > On an IPv6-only network, the default configuration for ntp-service-type > doesn't work, because the default pool used (<0.guix.pool.ntp.org>) > doesn't have IPv6 addresses. > > In fact, the <1.guix.pool.ntp.org> and <3.guix.pool.ntp.org> pools don't > have IPv6 addresses either. Only the <2.guix.pool.ntp.org> pool works > with IPv6. > > Would it be possible to add IPv6 support to pools 0, 1 and 3? It's not something that we, as Guix, can do. The NTP pool is run by a separate organization, and the question of which DNS names should return AAAA (IPv6) records is open: https://community.ntppool.org/t/the-time-has-come-we-must-enable-ipv6-entirely/1968 However, the reason they give us 4 different addresses is so that we can spread the load around. Our NTP services should choose randomly at run-time. Or we could just make number 2 the default, and then we'll have IPv6 support. Or something more complicated...