From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:303:e224::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms13.migadu.com with LMTPS id SL6VJwKcfWZsbQAA62LTzQ:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 27 Jun 2024 17:06:10 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:303:e224::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1.migadu.com with LMTPS id SL6VJwKcfWZsbQAA62LTzQ (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 27 Jun 2024 19:06:10 +0200 X-Envelope-To: larch@yhetil.org Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=famulari.name header.s=mesmtp header.b="G XWqt1S"; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm2 header.b=kuj1uZaG; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1719507970; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:resent-cc:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references: list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post: dkim-signature; bh=bLOcd2rWHtTF9tae1uYyuMDj72An+om4RN8Z1edUjmc=; b=Xv9AehBZvb8oUNxoYgIEI5vSsIQ7wQCfbccHTEbJpc6nwkMfL32O7JaFDaroyn7lcMPkYb omqNq2s1YF2DXl0nJnyGXOWpjeDr3zLgbNz3hX5+SQ3sNQwFR3nXOKHlhZvNYRWuvbY+WS K7VxBOpPcPUmrc+rTjSYnTJVE4uKT6hWc1p5tneXpWY6NefdQY1xOrkX4vkbhcYoBCzRA1 zcunlGuKKYL9PgOlpIe4pgbYrCsUwx93J51A8hKiv2CybrVbuHOxxUpU7NlcE17KiVvCuQ i2ElKd19bqi1OYNm+lNuWaKlFFnnkxZTw4IVrwTuJwtJTGS8Q+5aSuzCMywlvw== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1719507970; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=Cn/sBMnua/JRhkBrrSupnulZURl8mA2QrpBTOqtAyO4w5MA+j5GPFCFcpBHUNz1eScqWOQ 7mnw2KceyF0VFZJj+uafqzfh+HwCpdw3VxS72T1POzERp8IXCC5RVPk1wS56kWglkJTc7o cxV7duwJkd1BDmRnWLj39y4WE6jSyghn2Aaqc/reoOlLaMU0+CY8WCDuHL6YY/NiDR0wmS 2juTe37CmAx/ortC3pTeLQowONs06glz1ZWKumT9HzXEUVngbM0ExcxJQztpAEF7Veu/pH eS6KjaWhNAqTqJLj4abEFXxUyoeCh4OWyukeKnRAHV+wl9rQO1kOsOJtv8uh4A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=famulari.name header.s=mesmtp header.b="G XWqt1S"; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm2 header.b=kuj1uZaG; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C8E5D1F99A for ; Thu, 27 Jun 2024 19:06:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sMsZR-00061F-3F; Thu, 27 Jun 2024 13:06:05 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sMsZO-00060x-Hk for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Jun 2024 13:06:02 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sMsZL-0000th-0z for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Jun 2024 13:06:01 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1sMsZN-0004Ox-Tb for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Jun 2024 13:06:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#71640] yt-dlp: Update to 2024-05-27 Resent-From: Leo Famulari Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2024 17:06:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 71640 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Maxim Cournoyer Cc: 71640@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 71640-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B71640.171950794416891 (code B ref 71640); Thu, 27 Jun 2024 17:06:01 +0000 Received: (at 71640) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Jun 2024 17:05:44 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43278 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1sMsZ5-0004ON-OI for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 27 Jun 2024 13:05:43 -0400 Received: from fhigh6-smtp.messagingengine.com ([103.168.172.157]:39819) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1sMsZ2-0004O9-Ti for 71640@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 27 Jun 2024 13:05:42 -0400 Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailfhigh.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 456CC114019E; Thu, 27 Jun 2024 13:05:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 27 Jun 2024 13:05:32 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:subject:subject:to:to; s=mesmtp; t=1719507932; x= 1719594332; bh=bLOcd2rWHtTF9tae1uYyuMDj72An+om4RN8Z1edUjmc=; b=G XWqt1SRTY8lUp8ij6qW44nnmODO4yV97scgIRt0oCZ0n+XY9XFFA4zDLcL8SBBdp jn962WJV74ZsR8b0o24pHQA7SrjP/PFAsISqaEjmul6gXs1psz2GrwhscJvKTCzD SABrEv6g3LpbIq7k8wY9+x/+H6HUL6n4uJVGrVYb+Y= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to :to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= fm2; t=1719507932; x=1719594332; bh=bLOcd2rWHtTF9tae1uYyuMDj72An +om4RN8Z1edUjmc=; b=kuj1uZaGXELz/M0GpiqRNPBbasH9xJeGY2BXBXhaKmML WZc6xSq1Dqm8gl0wsRs3+Y/AuHHR6Vhfc/xTYmbTPNKVlDogbvTDlubSWPoG3wYH wKg2D306JgJgoXSpI8HediA5x76pp5vRXAs8M6MZu5y2W3hTTe0r+IP5+09lpClO u72HCAZ2geMpkbUltdr+W5ekcmvknPmY7BPZmq/f11qSAtZyKXTTHSttNq/1jNjz WKJ1BGINFhzRBW7C+HySXBKHJjwVfHwQ6lSTf6lS+5EUfMl2rpxWy47MpmfJBdVh x2wX7NofM7zYJ4gi9+eDk4brmGvkbZctVauZ0V1asQ== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeeftddrtdeggddutdelucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepfffhvfevuffkfhggtggujgesthdtredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepnfgvohcu hfgrmhhulhgrrhhiuceolhgvohesfhgrmhhulhgrrhhirdhnrghmvgeqnecuggftrfgrth htvghrnhepieetudehfeekueefleegudfhjefgleehfeeluefhfeffgfeuudelhedvjeel ieetnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomheplh gvohesfhgrmhhulhgrrhhirdhnrghmvg X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i819c4023:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Thu, 27 Jun 2024 13:05:31 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2024 13:05:28 -0400 From: Leo Famulari Message-ID: References: <79fa17151ff834161b71e2dbffe853ddff29a66d.1718763195.git.leo@famulari.name> <87cyo79k5m.fsf_-_@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87cyo79k5m.fsf_-_@gmail.com> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Queue-Id: C8E5D1F99A X-Migadu-Scanner: mx12.migadu.com X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -5.47 X-Spam-Score: -5.47 X-TUID: jwWurnr27Z+K On Sun, Jun 23, 2024 at 09:58:13PM -0400, Maxim Cournoyer wrote: > > + python-requests-next ; TODO Remove this special package > > + python-urllib3-next ; TODO Remove this one too > > That's OK only because that's an application and these inputs are not > propagated. I'm a bit worried the '-next' variants may be used by > packagers elsewhere, but I guess this means we should give the > python-team branch a spin. I could make the packages hidden. Is there a better approach? > Also, I see you haven't used inheritance anywhere; I guess that's to > make the transition to the latest package as painful as possible > (simply deleting the old definitions). For me, using inheritance is painful, and this is relatively painless.