From: Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il>
To: Christopher Baines <mail@cbaines.net>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, 70456@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: branch core-updates updated (c8c6883398 -> 0e06c9697a)
Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2024 12:54:27 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZmV706i6uTb69V1Q@3900XT> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87jziy1mal.fsf@cbaines.net>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2048 bytes --]
On Sun, Jun 09, 2024 at 10:46:10AM +0100, Christopher Baines wrote:
> guix-commits@gnu.org writes:
>
> > efraim pushed a change to branch core-updates
> > in repository guix.
> >
> > from c8c6883398 gnu: dico: Add libxcrypt dependency.
> > new 9804f8c149 gnu: coeurl: Update to 0.3.1.
> > new 51c7b6d76f gnu: font-gnu-freefont: Build with newer fontforge.
> > new 0e06c9697a gnu: Remove fontforge-20190801.
> >
> > The 3 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this
> > repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions
> > listed as "add" were already present in the repository and have only
> > been added to this reference.
>
> These changes confused me as I was looking at the trying to work out why
> they needed to be pushed to core-updates. Eventually I figured out that
> Git is right, these commits are entirely new, but they duplicate
> existing commits already pushed to master (e.g. 0e06c9697a is a
> duplicate of 3d5f4b2d7dda).
>
> I know the new guidance says to "Avoid merging master in to the branch",
> but one of the reasons for that is to avoid situations just like this
> where merges are done incorrectly and commits are duplicated between
> branches.
>
> To fix this, I think we should rebase core-updates on master and drop
> these commits.
I wasn't aware I was "doing it wrong" with this, I saw that coeurl 0.3.0
failed on core-updates but a bump to 0.3.1 fixed the build, and it could
go to master also. Similar story with working to remove
fontforge-20190801 which no longer built on core-updates. I figured that
applying the patch to both branches would make it easier to merge master
into core-updates since there would be less drift between the two.
What is the correct way to apply a patch to multiple branches?
--
Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il> רנשלפ םירפא
GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-09 9:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <171792086189.17847.16499633131068637226@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org>
2024-06-09 9:46 ` branch core-updates updated (c8c6883398 -> 0e06c9697a) Christopher Baines
2024-06-09 9:54 ` Efraim Flashner [this message]
2024-06-09 10:20 ` Christopher Baines
2024-06-09 11:34 ` bug#70456: " Christopher Baines
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZmV706i6uTb69V1Q@3900XT \
--to=efraim@flashner.co.il \
--cc=70456@debbugs.gnu.org \
--cc=guix-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=mail@cbaines.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.