From: Tomas Volf <~@wolfsden.cz>
To: Fabio Natali <me@fabionatali.com>
Cc: help-guix@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Virtualisation alternatives for deploying a small number of services
Date: Wed, 22 May 2024 19:16:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zk4ohuH5wb-DEEY9@ws> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <875xv5voew.fsf@fabionatali.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1847 bytes --]
On 2024-05-22 16:47:51 +0100, Fabio Natali wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to run a small number of VMs on a single physical machine. The
> reason for using VMs is security, i.e. to get a strong level of
> isolation when deploying some services.
>
> Among the options I've been considering:
>
> + libvirt, which I understand would imply some manual (potentially non
> declarative?) setup, beyond defining and bringing up the libvirt Guix
> service.
> + Ganeti, which might be a bit of an overkill for this particular use
> case.
> + Guix's 'least-authority-wrapper', which of course would give me
> containerisation rather than virtualisation, so not really what I'm
> looking for.
>
> I think libvirt is my favourite option so far but I was wondering if
> there's any further alternative that I haven't been considering.
>
> I think the ideal solution would be some wrapper similar to the
> least-authority one, but that spins up a VM rather than a container. I
> see there's 'virtual-build-machine-service-type' which of course
> wouldn't fit the bill, but it might be close to the idea of a VM-based
> wrapper?
>
> Any ideas or pointers to existing solution are welcome.
If your main goal is strong isolation and security, you probably might want to
take a look at firecracker[0]. Downside is non-existent support in Guix, not
even a package.
The wrapper along the lines of least-authority is quite an interesting idea and
I will likely explore it a bit, thank you.
0: https://github.com/firecracker-microvm/firecracker
>
> Thanks, best, Fabio.
>
> (I'd be grateful if you could CC me in if replying as otherwise I might
> miss your email.)
>
>
> --
> Fabio Natali
> https://fabionatali.com
>
Have a nice day,
Tomas Volf
--
There are only two hard things in Computer Science:
cache invalidation, naming things and off-by-one errors.
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-22 17:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-22 15:47 Virtualisation alternatives for deploying a small number of services Fabio Natali
2024-05-22 17:16 ` Tomas Volf [this message]
2024-05-23 15:52 ` Fabio Natali
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Zk4ohuH5wb-DEEY9@ws \
--to=~@wolfsden.cz \
--cc=help-guix@gnu.org \
--cc=me@fabionatali.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.