From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:58f0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms1.migadu.com with LMTPS id oJRoJoAyMWacLAAAqHPOHw:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 30 Apr 2024 20:03:44 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:58f0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0.migadu.com with LMTPS id oJRoJoAyMWacLAAAqHPOHw (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 30 Apr 2024 20:03:44 +0200 X-Envelope-To: larch@yhetil.org Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=gmail.com header.s=20230601 header.b=iYEXvBpM; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1714500224; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=iOjoG+m9J7QSLSQx30u+hfL+SZlUNFyJk+DU4dAWLfM=; b=q8th5b+9G72QuWNZ+wRUkVlYaQO/uBVNAydXZt5D8octVoQiZzYJv3NZs/msOdpTmgsaMC v22gilPG5FPuU1yXOsPy7UEWD4/ECfhCm62c5s/dgcphs9H+tRpoqeS51VyRTRhe9d5m5B U9dH8Yr+Y3m+vgoU9T/bhr4RA55Jm6++rIJnYz6CM3F6ZYMH2eDlhI/kXuK+o5ZIGHKrCu g7yjQLaZnAJvO0mhBp2tix2VV9cStSn5PrEZbtUg7+Ly/5zIEMS7RQmpFe6rMcv5YQtaH9 82/AAqrXorX2DXxWjSTu2+j275Mphfzw1QXNbY0BREDMWT+MSoxLUIOOjX/Rxg== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1714500224; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=tru4lt9VqkaIeuotfcQaavNh0TeWh/lJKn7iJ0h8nE9Qt+yTeca0dYzBQKprOe8J481i8T JUtG6aKHsCI1NsBXPoaeZDcgGYSyubwE6PAz4GAypgA47yeSZIrAKCmJmScmPAdkSWPEaj rG4tV2tuskdCfHXm9hu+7EF72y0wzomzwfifbnv5kCnzJBonvc+D75IpvZtqxYHnE+YOXP 7rxx+kHSRNXp1pfSKjykcbGEQT2B0gshaJkpdo9AxeXlHG121TkJUZlS3l505CHpqZWJ+h TmIX1/je2K7VQcYREPegsjRZBJZcn/VVlPhhBi9lNx9YQL4Dn/TT9QoL5TACdg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=gmail.com header.s=20230601 header.b=iYEXvBpM; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B119FBCA for ; Tue, 30 Apr 2024 20:03:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1s1row-0007JP-DN; Tue, 30 Apr 2024 14:03:14 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1s1rol-00079Z-P0 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Apr 2024 14:03:07 -0400 Received: from mail-qk1-x730.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::730]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1s1roj-0006Nm-8X for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Apr 2024 14:03:03 -0400 Received: by mail-qk1-x730.google.com with SMTP id af79cd13be357-78ebc7e1586so7955585a.1 for ; Tue, 30 Apr 2024 11:03:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1714500180; x=1715104980; darn=gnu.org; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references :mail-followup-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:sender:from:to :cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=iOjoG+m9J7QSLSQx30u+hfL+SZlUNFyJk+DU4dAWLfM=; b=iYEXvBpM320F4Vs+VDKcC+xlX631HyOUnBlbRPzUzIiTABxt8hfUJF6BRxxATBdfWC RAsUlc2xdl2xO26EFU864sU5RqrcCqbRPlD4yBcGjQ5rV+50tx9sBptonM27MiliSSFx wA8FPYioCCRDsn6h7l1yKON+xhcnen9OzYctnNUgmF/yXNwgY+kY02zNzf4z830PJF8w EjqvupW2hu6h70oYflfR/f6sLG2Bt912IHr5lS/iHONYAyKlxP1jmxBY8bafs0Rijo0O 3kwk08TCUpD77h5Q/KRBlr9swSPHlVc3YFQBp93jiyOU37GjznOtgE3YltzrfcYbDDdB oKaQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1714500180; x=1715104980; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references :mail-followup-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:sender :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=iOjoG+m9J7QSLSQx30u+hfL+SZlUNFyJk+DU4dAWLfM=; b=Kocf6VGg2NoupWS6mq9yhFq7+5YNbtB7mdG6T6x2MLIcTICcL0BSt0vnTaZC9fJEvn ErWVEfOv3kqJAoOCPgXokO2YqZfl3GQUuzRct7DKQ8+Tf+2TLAtSUXn8RoIuM/qmzxNz LwftEkkihqYxl1dLyrqRc12jRoV9E1OnWNX/ErBsaK9YmDl0qiVvzErJSrlx722Ki3f4 sx2aV3fBjWiF7ftsjnUVErTbHz5lUY+1P8Q+qjT+4OdWQwLC4956bo1/+UjHw2SZu+E1 gVTPlPfXb+o7OVZbt/y8SZLaewaWtb/LL2ZlCpoesqXP+u0eIVP98MrhyRlBUFH/kwWJ 1A+g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyOi7tBFGoGJQHeuNKop37+zDvmf1Kobb2wTiGtWfVvBeV3g8Yy UK9jaXGzsD7QzhS6/rOji0ZiofmS639LxKEu0nA309O28onx4QcPs3aphg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IH+HjFzMzZaxTzoCrLM+7xP17FvTF5YjWG9xzR/Qf9iGqSH20T1XAwLp94b1RPLcZZVjaM2vQ== X-Received: by 2002:ad4:4ee4:0:b0:69b:6b28:f941 with SMTP id dv4-20020ad44ee4000000b0069b6b28f941mr6767675qvb.20.1714500179533; Tue, 30 Apr 2024 11:02:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (ool-ad039216.dyn.optonline.net. [173.3.146.22]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r13-20020ad4404d000000b006a056f65896sm11319371qvp.106.2024.04.30.11.02.58 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 30 Apr 2024 11:02:59 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2024 21:03:01 +0300 From: Efraim Flashner To: Ricardo Wurmus Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Subject: Re: Hackathon: fix build errors on the "master" branch. Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: Ricardo Wurmus , guix-devel@gnu.org References: <87o79smdaq.fsf@elephly.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="F9AY1g3rQ/c95UeQ" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87o79smdaq.fsf@elephly.net> X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x41AAE7DCCA3D8351 X-PGP-Key: https://flashner.co.il/~efraim/efraim_flashner.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::730; envelope-from=efraim.flashner@gmail.com; helo=mail-qk1-x730.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -17 X-Spam_score: -1.8 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.248, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -3.99 X-Spam-Score: -3.99 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 7B119FBCA X-Migadu-Scanner: mx11.migadu.com X-TUID: Nsv2VjHvzsA9 --F9AY1g3rQ/c95UeQ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 04:52:29PM +0200, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > Hi Guix, >=20 > for the past weeks the "master" branch has been in pretty poor state > according to ci.guix.gnu.org. It keeps hovering at around 56% progress, > which is a far cry from the 80+% we used to have in the old days. >=20 > A lot of packages are in fact broken. Many more are marked as broken > due to a bug affecting ci.guix.gnu.org. >=20 > It would be a good idea to do a little spring cleaning and go through > the dashboard for the master branch and work on fixing builds that are > currently broken on x86_64-linux. (Other architectures are in worse > state, but fixing x86_64-linux may be something we can actually > accomplish.) >=20 > What do you think? Using the QA=C2=B9 page we can see another data point of how the different architectures are doing. Also, assuming there are 30,000 packages, the 4.3% difference on bayfront between x86_64 and i686 would be 129 packages. Given how easy it is to build for i686 on x86_64 I'd suggest also going through some of the i686 packages which don't build and checking if there's a build failure that can be patched or if it's a case of the software not supporting 32-bit architectures. =C2=B9 https://qa.guix.gnu.org/branch/master --=20 Efraim Flashner =D7=A8=D7=A0=D7=A9=D7=9C=D7=A4 = =D7=9D=D7=99=D7=A8=D7=A4=D7=90 GPG key =3D A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted --F9AY1g3rQ/c95UeQ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEoov0DD5VE3JmLRT3Qarn3Mo9g1EFAmYxMlQACgkQQarn3Mo9 g1G35A/+IF5l7VYbd/KW7nPCkNgIR05fCdpkRAcELf/JYwGB1r2a+BX6FBysTd1Q tUzWFPvcLiAjLShPJHzGuGsf31VSheXBUzB9UXLuHxYmT/ta0trkLaSU655OT2hh yDmQAuYQ6/X+fX64VOor4hQwx9xHXh+gHsJj13jTu9qutxUkY1JBjnO6vqKW9MGK cg8DsarrpswmtN+z5gqgJ3cZBVUZOXUACzUgG/60lXthZHtePY7C4PTiVI/lOxZ/ 7j40+Pi8+AGAy3bJ5DLnY3LelLvEsh/EqgAkFZ5VknDDnFxPnxoBlcGlBBN/8ikC mvyhGePJG/nYtr0EBeTwQ5sE64fo7Y51XhJ8Kv1KtOPnYSdjjn5iFG4DCXYOB4tZ /WReYrnNejYMQ9m5QG8KMlcNfN4Nm1p7wlUt0G4X2xXmEIbt/LOOL3i2NmX2VzU2 D6tWhKHjutIHlvnC2T5g3UXuRPHTC50LeM9Gd3Jb0fsWvN+IFYbk1psSDf9416EW 2hro1rJko1U8zaKBrhyztRXt31F1wbWrIetEKURD+NCELNuhRo/0KMcLP9c9oH3B pfJQYYvWMpWG60zkZ10rmkNyHyIhubn6/yoI7tQuYJ4XuKhUOehrLKuE+m+F3t6j ysdTQzcVJ6iW4Vs4qX655SwYql0pLBn60Pi6gFz8/QmR31iZOcQ= =F2cS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --F9AY1g3rQ/c95UeQ--