On 2024-04-18 19:43:41 +0100, Fabio Natali wrote: > On 2024-04-17, 10:30 +0100, Fabio Natali wrote: > > Hi, a quick follow-up on a couple of points. > > Also, I suppose one could use Guix's 'invoke' instead of a custom > 'checked-system*'? > > https://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/68289/#0-lineno88 > > Cheers, F. Yes, that would be an option. I do not remember why I wrote it like this, it is possible I just did not know about `invoke' at that time (the code is over a year old). However I am not sure whether it is fine to depend on code in the (guix build utils) module for non-build purposes. Assuming it is fine, I have no problem sending a v2. Cheers, T. -- There are only two hard things in Computer Science: cache invalidation, naming things and off-by-one errors.