From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:303:e16b::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms1.migadu.com with LMTPS id CLTvDd5WLmZGuQAAe85BDQ:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 28 Apr 2024 16:02:06 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:303:e16b::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2.migadu.com with LMTPS id CLTvDd5WLmZGuQAAe85BDQ (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 28 Apr 2024 16:02:06 +0200 X-Envelope-To: larch@yhetil.org Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=none ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1714312926; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:resent-cc:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references: list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post; bh=5wga3mvRCf/4/G5w4plb/QM4e4LP4dmgvXGTJmXntlM=; b=PeY17GcEPsQWeKYn6g1T5HjWxlyrkIfOKZJOux2q7AUHrxQvQiA9KfysJknZ7dSg6O1jbs 4eC9P8CQR7usD0CggVfNg6fBbxekszt/53tNmQEtv/neTs+3/HB/eK43NV1kaWB400TPU7 j6CAoEeg0aC/wYJLr3MNTZNMP8Rvbri+Mq/eH1mAM2G70PhgP4meVAe0swrO4lxeP2uyDA /GzRYwOOwiWYfH94UT3txTs1KBdGUO68MeO0Qc0KOYID5A3eeHScEPOq2KN3VOLIaUgOgQ sUVBGZIrXe49m+82xbppuTyeNkjtdaIqSOJzHTw1kdYUgF/dvEcB+QGReFdDkw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=none ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1714312926; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=RvLLL8p2vilb1SZDv5uJ/+ZLkP9k71AQrJgjejuLT36XXE50QdMKhMAREu8MI73s1E8y/X qq5aV9dgtEw5Ytra+VyB9I8gx4qxVdH03kIdecYb/s/EqfMNjYBGsQLEYrerBwxejQNAAY L450kEoXVVGs43K1hs1nSmD6ZvXCNrFjWQPUo7ABcbHvS7hVd/72qnuFJH50wG6TeWFXwE YQ8gMazKmP5Rz3qGpej4GE4j73vOL4YPrDYlxjXVNi/iUpke24Mw/lLia/RfAzGRd6YVvQ VOtksUUwV5aKOAFtQQjBsfz6uWyYGo8NK0LSCXp8qT9kcHwBbmvPI1z5Vs1J0Q== Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0F30B544E3 for ; Sun, 28 Apr 2024 16:02:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1s156B-0007xD-CB; Sun, 28 Apr 2024 10:01:47 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1s1567-0007wq-E2 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Apr 2024 10:01:43 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1s1567-00018I-6P for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Apr 2024 10:01:43 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1s156Q-0001sz-9N for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Apr 2024 10:02:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#70567] [PATCH 0/7] frama-c: Update to 28.1. Resent-From: Andreas Enge Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2024 14:02:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 70567 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Jean-Pierre De Jesus Diaz Cc: 70567@debbugs.gnu.org, Julien Lepiller , Sharlatan Hellseher , Arnaud Daby-Seesaram , Eric Bavier Received: via spool by 70567-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B70567.17143129187243 (code B ref 70567); Sun, 28 Apr 2024 14:02:02 +0000 Received: (at 70567) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Apr 2024 14:01:58 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50310 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1s156L-0001sl-S2 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 28 Apr 2024 10:01:58 -0400 Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([185.233.100.1]:55400) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1s156J-0001sf-TH for 70567@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 28 Apr 2024 10:01:56 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E1DB65F; Sun, 28 Apr 2024 16:01:30 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at hera.aquilenet.fr Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hera.aquilenet.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Orne9c2cH-gP; Sun, 28 Apr 2024 16:01:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: from jurong (unknown [IPv6:2001:861:c4:f2f0::c64]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5D9C855; Sun, 28 Apr 2024 16:01:29 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2024 16:01:27 +0200 From: Andreas Enge Message-ID: References: <8734r9a3x1.fsf@nanein.fr> <23FB3A3D-8FED-418D-AF36-0EF59C95F0E7@lepiller.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -5.54 X-Spam-Score: -5.54 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 0F30B544E3 X-Migadu-Scanner: mx13.migadu.com X-TUID: kPzBXFSKR3DT Am Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 01:03:44PM +0000 schrieb Jean-Pierre De Jesus Diaz: > >Could they be moved to coq.scm? Or a more generic, maybe a new module > >related to theorem proving and/or source code analysis? Maybe into a > >renamed valgrind.scm? > I think it should be done but in a separate patch series as it would involve > moving quite a few things, maybe a formal-methods.scm module? Definitely, it should be done in a separate patch. As to what the module should be called, I will let the specialists discuss it among themselves :) Andreas