From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:4876::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms1.migadu.com with LMTPS id 0P25BIlVF2b6zAAAe85BDQ:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 11 Apr 2024 05:14:17 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:4876::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2.migadu.com with LMTPS id 0P25BIlVF2b6zAAAe85BDQ (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 11 Apr 2024 05:14:17 +0200 X-Envelope-To: larch@yhetil.org Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=famulari.name header.s=mesmtp header.b="j 9XwbnW"; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm2 header.b=Jofkmfp+; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1712805257; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=AG9kz4FD4GuXfF81b10iPHRBfMu31mLbaL+c4TRkhadRphLZvbA18oX0PX8KuJu0NmRpmL kvgyKaCPwb4D/DBqcSC6xi5vVT5iCQ7R5ybMS7JZYu+mICRHehd4/hPez0Ke+/kiNKbq4p Mdh0yJgH7B8TOXd9FfQvcqTiN99q6eWBhPOVl33UkFAa090uqcyILOpSCg8vh1Gy+bYb4m 4f+IQwnlGO1bIq0F5etnkgexG29/nd6A53fjeziivpR2EY4mpYau6m6DwW+iEp3Qz5uB6o o/R2giXU3oThheufNV9DSOuhbxCse45R6VvFmZd83DRR1Gkobp94AvDOD4vcOw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=famulari.name header.s=mesmtp header.b="j 9XwbnW"; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm2 header.b=Jofkmfp+; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1712805257; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:resent-cc:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references: list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post: dkim-signature; bh=O5Lb1cRn370zvIn6+AhHHy6g3ObZHdpi5zqNxz2Enyg=; b=ioPjwThevZyI0fTCJmjol/SR+RnFvxJy+xte6Wrvf3AizbWykvbisARQOLwYJOtk1Ct4Lg XQOt7uW0pPUJUxSZ2dE/LH3DW9SDLUve1aBX3KKJ2xWB8bEyUpWheaFCeyWRKYksRODOxO R8f1BY4OwLrSKmlkVqfmbqkFQ2K3JRNGaky3QU1npa0z0FiZsPfmDnjoDAHWArxs2lnt2H yroLnKw39SmHBLJpZsEK3F7dbxFv10guSXQR45TkgazQeaR9vdfUFJlEPM6g1Jf42ldg7f B6a6uSIVEW/YfsE9cuGyFzrjB4g9NT/7BdP69tiQ4SylkuzT5CRyAosMuzLctw== Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 20ACE97BA for ; Thu, 11 Apr 2024 05:14:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ruksv-0000SD-AQ; Wed, 10 Apr 2024 23:13:57 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rukst-0000Rw-Hg for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Apr 2024 23:13:55 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rukst-0000b1-35 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Apr 2024 23:13:55 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rukt1-0001SH-UI for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Apr 2024 23:14:03 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#70324: After upgrade of linux-libre, linux-libre-documentation fails to build Resent-From: Leo Famulari Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 03:14:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 70324 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Tomas Volf <~@wolfsden.cz> Cc: 70324@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 70324-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B70324.17128051865075 (code B ref 70324); Thu, 11 Apr 2024 03:14:03 +0000 Received: (at 70324) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Apr 2024 03:13:06 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54690 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ruks6-0001Jm-00 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 10 Apr 2024 23:13:06 -0400 Received: from wfout2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.145]:46167) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ruks2-0001J4-Bp for 70324@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 10 Apr 2024 23:13:04 -0400 Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailfout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0623A1C000EE; Wed, 10 Apr 2024 23:12:46 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 10 Apr 2024 23:12:47 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:subject:subject:to:to; s=mesmtp; t=1712805166; x= 1712891566; bh=O5Lb1cRn370zvIn6+AhHHy6g3ObZHdpi5zqNxz2Enyg=; b=j 9XwbnWBTR0V2W9CCdkEwz/+R32yWz5d1KpM6aWxynk8oFGrfUuIpsmkK+SzRtRwO B/DzcecjM8RUNKJ4e+VJxxMDlTGFYTpioqXll1OaFkXp+nf60qgHis3BkTqnyQl9 c5yF41bnhgRAoscpy50oK75UhVRxcM7Qkq+uhmyjEg= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to :to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= fm2; t=1712805166; x=1712891566; bh=O5Lb1cRn370zvIn6+AhHHy6g3ObZ Hdpi5zqNxz2Enyg=; b=Jofkmfp+2yclUwMbrAybG6WsVT6ZR2VsE9RUaHoMJSEW oefaqSYodakXDMzn3ZcKAuvTgT6ZnqT1cT8RBEGDHPPesHmgWcPUDn9eBJKYYtN9 VBr2VrDcymepJcUL0dSQIyUf5L1FJvDRMIsD7AYilaay2Ra2SA+apeoWgdSX1H/C baMR02eFA7N0r6y0TTgK3uxTR76MaxujgsXpGs+N3/bKip6iI7s893h1Yn2uLTLp 8ebYZ5YhQBG4Dtqun4yb+JawZIfDS7/QCNxCEdexOO34ZtoAbi/69xwPbM+eADrI k8oaOv7T0aHxhU7Re/T1W4KmZsgGoVnnqirq7vKq2g== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvledrudehjedgieelucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpeffhffvvefukfhfgggtuggjsehttd ertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefnvghoucfhrghmuhhlrghrihcuoehlvghosehfrghmuhhl rghrihdrnhgrmhgvqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeetheeuvdeivdelueeukefhtdeihe dtgefhvddvlefhudejudeiheelfeevteeuhfenucffohhmrghinhepghhnuhdrohhrghen ucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehlvghose hfrghmuhhlrghrihdrnhgrmhgv X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i819c4023:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Wed, 10 Apr 2024 23:12:45 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 23:12:43 -0400 From: Leo Famulari Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US X-Spam-Score: -5.47 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 20ACE97BA X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -5.47 X-Migadu-Scanner: mx10.migadu.com X-TUID: l9Z0N7iINOhO On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 05:05:15PM +0200, Tomas Volf wrote: > linux-libre-documentation is broken again: > > starting phase `build' > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "/tmp/guix-build-linux-libre-documentation-6.8.4.drv-0/linux-6.8.4/./tools/net/ynl/ynl-gen-rst.py", line 26, in > import yaml > ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'yaml' It looks like the package depends on pyyaml now. I wonder if that's intentional. Did you search the upstream bug tracker to look for more info? > How are these not caught in the CI? What do you mean? The CI server did register the build failure: https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/3863875/details As well as many other build failures in the kernel packages: https://ci.guix.gnu.org/eval/1228559