From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:4876::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms8.migadu.com with LMTPS id WFGWJJsO0mV7YQEAe85BDQ:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 18 Feb 2024 15:05:15 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:4876::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2.migadu.com with LMTPS id WFGWJJsO0mV7YQEAe85BDQ (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 18 Feb 2024 15:05:15 +0100 X-Envelope-To: larch@yhetil.org Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=wolfsden.cz header.s=mail header.b="s2/35kXK"; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=wolfsden.cz header.s=mail header.b="s2/35kXK"; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=wolfsden.cz (policy=none) ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1708265115; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:resent-cc:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references: list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post: dkim-signature; bh=1UX4TKV3ZyItkrQX5iAEXyxR7nII+lYlZ4tQtINdp6w=; b=b7PP2GzoTbWoEmLXi2uioS5mlAnI6GemoxBnXlSGvxZNDfKZcgnuOmpczyNQtNFXAUD9gh C5mPqCTx9tYsSIbdMz2rEW+C6auPdoYbHdYHfQuCJg/ytPsWP+4edpHnCbNwBU70rz9Vrg rG7gttAgK0QMnSq8NFwlBwdnKM13+m0WKBkJMSqnEnaaExPFVSZHTPNUf8KahcTneVyK/7 PhjnJv0MhV1aJmg7bvqD3WlYX0iXvaT/sKA8YlT4hUfPAdDi6eg/AgGLJl4sxIG+PN32nY F6GqYg3U4bQD1V3ue7ttZCxtdm35wJyZFeWDRm9KydS24zQ/OGWIPU2oVDV74Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=wolfsden.cz header.s=mail header.b="s2/35kXK"; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=wolfsden.cz header.s=mail header.b="s2/35kXK"; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=wolfsden.cz (policy=none) ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1708265115; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=ME4XJx7Ern6HRROUYqAxqaACDg0zV0EPY50NMf0wCiV37qUFXnAlmu3eCov3S+9f35/PSd JH2wNT1hWEx48Qx1HRdbCAF2sftNceH4+rEOULtVxu5/hFs3/Zj6onFChDhtxYHK4kC/wT jdWoLYoMDdYaCvt99auo17Hu086wSPcccHUgmTFfyC5ub5XsHq6kLkpAR83HsaA3L80RKk bXqegboFqWHqCmHAtH6OUZKKCYdP8fzhlp28+OfaaMJzsz3nYjGJJDH7ZHEASA/KGk3Nuu exKVS0S7UXa+Kw3ZEWudWMDP32zBwYDb3nfUUFkiux9AVPeSLRryWuX4Sq7B1Q== Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 793D1215ED for ; Sun, 18 Feb 2024 15:05:15 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rbhmd-0005sw-TB; Sun, 18 Feb 2024 09:04:44 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rbhmc-0005sS-81 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Feb 2024 09:04:42 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rbhmb-0000aH-W0 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Feb 2024 09:04:42 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rbhmw-0007uU-BP for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Feb 2024 09:05:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#69170] [PATCH rust-team 00/46] Add netavark Resent-From: Tomas Volf <~@wolfsden.cz> Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2024 14:05:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 69170 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Efraim Flashner Cc: 69170@debbugs.gnu.org, 69169@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 69170-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B69170.170826508330361 (code B ref 69170); Sun, 18 Feb 2024 14:05:02 +0000 Received: (at 69170) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Feb 2024 14:04:43 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34270 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rbhmd-0007tY-7p for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 18 Feb 2024 09:04:43 -0500 Received: from wolfsden.cz ([37.205.8.62]:52510) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <~@wolfsden.cz>) id 1rbhmW-0007tE-5x; Sun, 18 Feb 2024 09:04:41 -0500 Received: by wolfsden.cz (Postfix, from userid 104) id C298D293350; Sun, 18 Feb 2024 14:04:13 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=wolfsden.cz; s=mail; t=1708265053; bh=unZqRQRzPt2fHuGzlPtSXsE3xj4rLvW46vC2ngt53pE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=s2/35kXKu2qQIytYGLTdW8R208xyNwJW1od8yn4F+1usRBOSwI+yseVQTHJyCUolp Ba8LsdAjRVpOE+l2wwvVFGNetKy4mv9KBZ6+tiOse3TDURLi7uRdc5UxuMNSrbA0z8 pCNkEzC4pyyUVzwql1O7gS8Rg3Vl+aR+dI/c6OszPiDn6GNCvS1RFOSGvSx/PDC+ox fOW6OBYLTClEaCRJX9x7570mQQQHkncQWr0vqX8groYaNuq6DNT6hDAcf8hKsgsaQA aSBh8DChQmdlK4n1RrWYBVvkOXasxWd3UoixezzEyCWylHNXkUeVE9H7EO+jelZJ0k STaYNEKOg0FVDdBAUK5j4pqPucaie9ld1m6m4gnuNkj9pjonsUPpQAD6uUxImJCJ+i qYCb0LnMaxhahvV2dpjvoLu45WBkAAaLxzhUAdiahtMQpCFBI2LmN7YTI4F3lpG75D D21Aoab4A/oug6ZOkoB3ItljID8rEjHx3kRBxLlgi+X5MbfMYvzdjt8bpOr7Yuo0z/ u9mNl/IWRckSOji00t+0/WhGv+NJefsqt0BMZkVN12qKS911LH51iA3CJLTWYFWHur auNuiCJaiOw2HvfcxtwX3w7flmousnqqVtRbET+DEGuKrMha8AMRizc+KPeqetKoN1 yyoWDuYvC4D9+u8L+uIOFAzg= Received: from localhost (unknown [146.70.134.132]) by wolfsden.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DE6992983C8; Sun, 18 Feb 2024 14:04:12 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=wolfsden.cz; s=mail; t=1708265053; bh=unZqRQRzPt2fHuGzlPtSXsE3xj4rLvW46vC2ngt53pE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=s2/35kXKu2qQIytYGLTdW8R208xyNwJW1od8yn4F+1usRBOSwI+yseVQTHJyCUolp Ba8LsdAjRVpOE+l2wwvVFGNetKy4mv9KBZ6+tiOse3TDURLi7uRdc5UxuMNSrbA0z8 pCNkEzC4pyyUVzwql1O7gS8Rg3Vl+aR+dI/c6OszPiDn6GNCvS1RFOSGvSx/PDC+ox fOW6OBYLTClEaCRJX9x7570mQQQHkncQWr0vqX8groYaNuq6DNT6hDAcf8hKsgsaQA aSBh8DChQmdlK4n1RrWYBVvkOXasxWd3UoixezzEyCWylHNXkUeVE9H7EO+jelZJ0k STaYNEKOg0FVDdBAUK5j4pqPucaie9ld1m6m4gnuNkj9pjonsUPpQAD6uUxImJCJ+i qYCb0LnMaxhahvV2dpjvoLu45WBkAAaLxzhUAdiahtMQpCFBI2LmN7YTI4F3lpG75D D21Aoab4A/oug6ZOkoB3ItljID8rEjHx3kRBxLlgi+X5MbfMYvzdjt8bpOr7Yuo0z/ u9mNl/IWRckSOji00t+0/WhGv+NJefsqt0BMZkVN12qKS911LH51iA3CJLTWYFWHur auNuiCJaiOw2HvfcxtwX3w7flmousnqqVtRbET+DEGuKrMha8AMRizc+KPeqetKoN1 yyoWDuYvC4D9+u8L+uIOFAzg= Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2024 15:04:12 +0100 From: Tomas Volf <~@wolfsden.cz> Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="nmZx0jWQPlb9HInL" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Scanner: mx10.migadu.com X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -3.81 X-Spam-Score: -3.81 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 793D1215ED X-TUID: yNgQU6NBZQLD --nmZx0jWQPlb9HInL Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On 2024-02-18 14:39:23 +0200, Efraim Flashner wrote: > I pushed the patches to the rust-team branch without the change for > cargo-native-inputs and without the snippet for prost-build. I also > adjusted some of the patches so that the packages built. Well I am just happy it was merged, so no complains here, but I have to admit I am curious. Is it really expected that every user of prost-build will need to add protobuf into native-inputs? What if, in some new version, it starts requiring some-other-package instead of protobuf? All the downstream users will need to be adjusted as well. That seems somewhat sub-optimal. So I am trying to understand the reasoning here. Thanks and have a nice day, Tomas Volf -- There are only two hard things in Computer Science: cache invalidation, naming things and off-by-one errors. --nmZx0jWQPlb9HInL Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEt4NJs4wUfTYpiGikL7/ufbZ/wakFAmXSDlwACgkQL7/ufbZ/ wal44xAAkFTukPCekWqFrn0N2dMZlD9hKvW1pF21IUsJpjUZuLsmDWl/tlaUhpOq tOlXvN3WA+yCwC89vdpmgYySiQlOKmCiGfTG8Vb8itsBjL7c0r9og/azR1dyTKOm 4NYBhafR/ECySUxCPkXYKqzZ+5CUrRfNloQUeTFxHAvk5z0Fv0xBJW/ECu45ME6V sDl++5W8z32RhoLnIrkGB4XHIOTnrQvWkseQt9gazbmgAuY8yh5MFJUiH8iDgE8W 84TrTWY5y8QM2EWKM+hCQY9RTye6QO6gxAjwGkAMKO07AFZ1aR7fj0ehFZNLYhBX kVtIPQQgs5ldcKoJjQvLwjBjHbHfzdL9XZSY0j3bEELfMDbCE2th0ErDeqsZw48C 17GviUt50uCLMfG7jUtq6h45dTiZVg7d+cvmx/S098L2lbKJma77kKV1vJY+CDS9 P2aC8w8PnSXnTTRb/8G+uI66ljRNCSnEIaXwkTeZQWFokSAnnarmuu+zO4RRq2Qx yKbEsCOKx2Hj2lDWJ/CDZ7+G/vjoDncfvD7cZJ3rl30zMhSG1LxV+tbD2TFQsac0 6N6LXUe1DVm7cdBEWh9D5qAgHdXhvnUmSG04h/DCZlxWIWhlMxsXgCuqgjWrOFoi AfaFBiCqDgZvnI4PPos7RuKqKPWYZFDQk329Eq/T3dcT5DY9lBU= =s2VG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nmZx0jWQPlb9HInL--