On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 05:27:21PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Hi Efraim,
> 
> Thanks for pushing this patch series past the finish line!
> 
> Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il> skribis:
> 
> > I'll look to see how to move this into
> > build-system-with-tuning-compiler. I think I previously got hung-up on
> > the tuning-compiler function which wouldn't work for go. At first glance
> > it looks like I could just lift-and-shift the extra phase over. I'll
> > just have to make sure that either it's only for the go-build-system or
> > occurs sometime after the setup-go-environment phase but before/after a
> > phase which exists in all build systems. Then it's the toss-up between
> > leaving it as-is and only occurring with the go-build-system or also
> > occurring on any tuned package which also has go code.
> 
> It looks like we’re now adding the ‘set-microarchitecture’ phase
> unconditionally, not just for go.  For example:
> 
> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
> $ ./pre-inst-env guix build --tune eigen-benchmarks --log-file
> guix build: tuning eigen-benchmarks@3.4.0 for CPU skylake
> https://ci.guix.gnu.org/log/djwka1jhzhk08yb23as83yk5hysn0pky-eigen-benchmarks-3.4.0
> $ wget -qO- https://ci.guix.gnu.org/log/djwka1jhzhk08yb23as83yk5hysn0pky-eigen-benchmarks-3.4.0 |gunzip -c| grep -C3 set-micro
> phase `reset-gzip-timestamps' succeeded after 0.0 seconds
> starting phase `compress-documentation'
> phase `compress-documentation' succeeded after 0.0 seconds
> starting phase `set-microarchitecture'
> Setting GOAMD to "v3".
> phase `set-microarchitecture' succeeded after 0.0 seconds
> @ build-succeeded /gnu/store/pdz0g9q2yd9i1jkbhk2rnbfa88ngvffw-eigen-benchmarks-3.4.0.drv -
> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
> 
> What I had in mind was to have a procedure similar to ‘tuning-compiler’
> that would return a wrapper around the “go” binary that would set
> ‘GOAMD’ (or similar).  That way the change would be well isolated.
> 
> Could you look into providing a patch for that?
> 
> Thanks in advance!
> 
> Ludo’.

That's actually really surprising to me. I thought that if you tried to
add a phase after a non-existent phase then it just wouldn't be added.

I tried just wrapping the call to the 'go' binary itself so that every
time 'go' was called it would also set the environment variable setting
the optimization level but I was having a hard time working that. While
experimenting I did change what I had written to check for the
'setup-go-environment phase, and if it existed to add the optimization
at the end of that phase.

I have the part with wrapping the go binary as a WIP, and when it's
ready I'll post both parts so we can choose which one seems better. I
like the idea of go being wrapped, it makes it easier to just add in the
optimizations whenever go is added to a package. On the other hand I
like the extra phase, since it's already done :)

-- 
Efraim Flashner   <efraim@flashner.co.il>   רנשלפ םירפא
GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D  14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted