Re: guix docker on gitlab-ci

[wolf <wolf@wolfsden.cz>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1137 bytes --]

On 2023-05-31 18:47:03 +0100, Graham Addis wrote:
> Hi Wolf,
> 
> On Tue, 30 May 2023 at 07:52, Graham Addis <grahamjamesaddis@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > ENTRYPOINT ["executable", "param1", "param2"] # The exec form, which
> > is the preferred form:
> 
> I realised that pack takes multiple symlink(s) using
> 
> --symlink /bin=bin --symlink /opt=opt
> 
> I could use the equivalent format for --entry-point
> 
> --entry-point executable --entry-point param1 --entry-point param2
> 
> This seems the most consistent approach with the current implementation so far.
> 
> Thoughts?
> 

I think that is a reasonable idea.  Only downside is that it would not be
backwards compatible (since currently last --entry-point wins), however I am not
sure if someone actually relies on that behavior.

Backwards compatible way would be keeping --entry-point as it is and introducing
new argument (--entry-point-arg) that could be used to build the argument list,
but I might be overthinking it :).

W.

-- 
There are only two hard things in Computer Science:
cache invalidation, naming things and off-by-one errors.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]