From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp11.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms9.migadu.com with LMTPS id ELGsHlGHN2QsQgEASxT56A (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 13 Apr 2023 06:38:41 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp11.migadu.com with LMTPS id EFG8HlGHN2Q9PgEA9RJhRA (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 13 Apr 2023 06:38:41 +0200 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5634B3FAB6 for ; Thu, 13 Apr 2023 06:38:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pmoio-0007b7-TF; Thu, 13 Apr 2023 00:38:10 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pmoin-0007ax-7r for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Apr 2023 00:38:09 -0400 Received: from mail-4322.protonmail.ch ([185.70.43.22]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pmoik-0000vK-JC for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Apr 2023 00:38:08 -0400 Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2023 04:37:55 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com; s=protonmail3; t=1681360684; x=1681619884; bh=TDjknnLM2A9/YLmoKBWWLmGu2Mq1rsCwTx1pWaZBrk8=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date:Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID: Message-ID:BIMI-Selector; b=qZ/eIRhOPNbZIoHZjimZl9dXqijBBJ4T88Bj3w8DGGbvmqHtyyVQctmvEoHQE2CzU 8GhOtdJldK0TTZSEzzEkPN8RW/pqyGoqEikVqhU+fB7YrgHUdVA7y8r3sJlNsSwXSq CkzUxpSfvD/lYIRzrXM2GmXZcewbwjM0gjB2KpFH8QIpil4OfAudP01wDlrGqVxq7j YKiS+jmvbMrUyo5aL7iYWD4u+XLQg1h2q97p+XXcSPeT7AhWR8b1uhuuD4Kd8AiDZL 0NAb3uKcuD/oKdq20vpj1eJBR/aEDaosCZFdcglIhHEcwaaJb4aIjrISObZVznA1qZ BxdVpkmkjmb/w== To: Andreas Enge From: Kaelyn Cc: guix-devel Subject: Re: i686 core-updates failure. Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Feedback-ID: 34709329:user:proton MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.70.43.22; envelope-from=kaelyn.alexi@protonmail.com; helo=mail-4322.protonmail.ch X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1681360721; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=d4j/2TwFgpodd43gnXDn3NPwCLR0cZK7TggHbaUv1wVcYnwH64arZRC7Pkb1gsl7S+I0KG kfkYXSJoNLa2mpAb03bzFLQjFCqfEdRgfgI9l3HAf1XwyeREB4RTcKDyOmrmsx62+XJj4k EG2mG8pBOPzNxohSzAwIdLOTR/YPDiHOZlS8s5qVgT5Q2WhJXAUmv1QZ105CJpwhNb0INF Zw47BN96EWp9UkpAlOV4l7mvogcM1p+VVFN5O78LGRkRDo/kbIfEQu7OcA79Nnq/MUNKWa niHPCo5vJdM+NtXRSz4+DFIBkASI0UYAkqb1g4dew0KWp8wVTcF0XV+Tbga4Sw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=protonmail.com header.s=protonmail3 header.b="qZ/eIRhO"; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=pass (policy=quarantine) header.from=protonmail.com ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1681360721; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:list-id:list-help: list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=TDjknnLM2A9/YLmoKBWWLmGu2Mq1rsCwTx1pWaZBrk8=; b=FIQJC+gbYSpiyPiBgAuQCEMU7WOoVr9/U8NI1yvtZd0qj42iAk14S8XG48EknRQ4NyJTx3 9ZSF8JOaTPj5fvZrdcogZ05ey78NLpPhfDyMP1kqwtMEii4yPsRpyY2fDoA9bJBsrU28w/ 8gg/Yf3+jV4uaFvvmkuqdVWSFEyZwcHjjVrXMmsjG2wHndbqnQOjOdJeddNhe3c+nQOtvW mg+kAxWkj98fYp8OqnDsLfkpBQbDFTqJ5MC0/qSvJj651Yu6apihqaHwayUppkKkZsHn1R ErugUT9wcILpkqcGL7xHW3jHRxAuiApsDHa4GS4VCKY1ujT0VUK3DmaHAcMubA== X-Migadu-Scanner: scn1.migadu.com X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -6.44 X-Spam-Score: -6.44 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 5634B3FAB6 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=protonmail.com header.s=protonmail3 header.b="qZ/eIRhO"; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=pass (policy=quarantine) header.from=protonmail.com X-TUID: YUp/ddU24D+g Hi, ------- Original Message ------- On Wednesday, April 12th, 2023 at 9:31 PM, Andreas Enge w= rote: >=20 >=20 > Hello, >=20 > Am Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 04:11:58PM +0000 schrieb Kaelyn: >=20 > > For the actual failures in python-numpy[2]: >=20 >=20 > you could always try whether an update solves the test failures; the pack= age > has 2892 dependents, but anyway, the only option is fixing it and rebuild= ing > all the 2892 dependents also on x86_64, or renouncing at the 2892 depende= nts > on i686. I think the former would be preferable (and maybe even required = for > merging). I forgot to mention that I had also tried updating to the latest numpy (2.2= 4.2), with the same tests failing. I agree the test failures in numpy need = to be resolved in some way for merging core-updates, since the failure affe= cts such a large number of common (desktop) applications on i686. My inclin= ation is to disable both failing tests (at least for now), and possibly upd= ating to the latest numpy since changing the package would trigger a rebuil= d anyway. I only hesitate about disabling TestKind.test_all since I don't k= now what role the Fortran bridging code plays in numpy and if the failure i= s a sign of a legitimate problem instead of a platform limitation (as the l= arge array test failure seems to be). Cheers, Kaelyn >=20 > Andreas