From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp11.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms9.migadu.com with LMTPS id 6LI/AoMgOWRKZgEASxT56A (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 14 Apr 2023 11:44:35 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp11.migadu.com with LMTPS id sN1qAoMgOWQhcwEA9RJhRA (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 14 Apr 2023 11:44:35 +0200 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD190247AF for ; Fri, 14 Apr 2023 11:44:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pnFyP-0005Ph-HX; Fri, 14 Apr 2023 05:44:05 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pnFyM-0005PQ-HH for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Apr 2023 05:44:02 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pnFyM-0001kk-8p for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Apr 2023 05:44:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pnFyM-0007qa-3T for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Apr 2023 05:44:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#61879: Patch Resent-From: Andreas Enge Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2023 09:44:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 61879 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Christopher Baines Cc: 61879@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 61879-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B61879.168146538730072 (code B ref 61879); Fri, 14 Apr 2023 09:44:02 +0000 Received: (at 61879) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Apr 2023 09:43:07 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45538 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pnFxT-0007oy-Hv for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 14 Apr 2023 05:43:07 -0400 Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([185.233.100.1]:37670) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pnFxR-0007oT-E4 for 61879@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 14 Apr 2023 05:43:06 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A5D228A; Fri, 14 Apr 2023 11:42:59 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at hera.aquilenet.fr Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hera.aquilenet.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 32orjyx01Ahz; Fri, 14 Apr 2023 11:42:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: from jurong (unknown [IPv6:2001:861:c4:f2f0::c64]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 58A1A277; Fri, 14 Apr 2023 11:42:58 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2023 11:42:56 +0200 From: Andreas Enge Message-ID: References: <87bkjqx48h.fsf@cbaines.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87bkjqx48h.fsf@cbaines.net> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1681465474; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=Gz6dEAc+iy21WZrJouBk1Q9Qc6hr+Z1rjo369Rb4cwAq43GdaX0YwMvjyp9AiJTJEbQde/ pFQxSK6zMiEwURWWLvB1PbWju4v0Jwxk27qoFSVVoeSXNAyFkXrAtoQ4YBDnspYTzm8ye+ zu0NMttpx5w1FveWExWFrZv3yclboVg2Mf7YlRbwlz/luDek3yQZqQLrWgat80NUBz+zcQ mYsz5JYPz/vDDbvPR96ARe297bNaeFvPU05q1RJwaLbPQnvQWEo9HPk+WoDASUa7xGMa0l lsHkO7aoTw/aCSK7YJhqYjJ4KDTqhXmxDcGcYhza/hlZOec7dzMOx235bOt5Uw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=none ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1681465474; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:resent-cc:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references: list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post; bh=DB4HelQ+4PXfgMgxV39+reLiuBbRnE3YPeu+C7VodDA=; b=gmRYXCyaXjnjoCR4AxFn7RQtqZZEtDSKpplr5ssgsL6AbG5z2TWWLl/k7kK6JLMwiZhxW4 X4XJyMpV7WidBjI3qo2EqhMZBmlxdCsKGjF/dzVS2+UTxlKE+JkxfxbJ6wB4WXUmfML8yZ y5SulwhTK0V/aBklkpCT4rTb/T/Oj/c6RZyXVVUB2hCGO84gy1aaNVWpFEHzzNagdIMlcW j3GFCpqGZGCyuwzZb76H81VFIkOQBQmgOlLn53ikSOSQqiaMwgu2f/qt3MGZ+fJJKB3BjY CY8TqJ/qnBKIKzm2NFCwweQBRXxQjCyhruc+WPWnp/wCE8cHSUrfkD7HmGuTeg== X-Migadu-Scanner: scn1.migadu.com X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -1.22 X-Spam-Score: -1.22 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: BD190247AF Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=none X-TUID: vAkO/J5+AZqy Am Fri, Apr 14, 2023 at 09:20:03AM +0100 schrieb Christopher Baines: > I haven't tried this yet, but I've had a quick look. I'm not sure > search-patches will work where it is, since that'll be running in the > build environment, without any access to the patches in the Guix git > repository. Good point. But is this not exactly like your previous commit, which I understood you had tested? But you are right: https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/909454/log/raw error: in phase 'patch-powerpc': uncaught exception: unbound-variable #f "Unbound variable: ~S" (search-patch) #f phase `patch-powerpc' failed after 0.0 seconds I will revert (the good news: it indeed did not break any other architecture). If we do not have access to the patch during build, we would need to replace it by an invocation of substitute*, with a lot of escaping of special characters like line ends, which would be annoying to test (well, one could test on x86_64 on a dummy package with the same source as gcc-11). Andreas