* OpenJDK in core-updates
@ 2023-04-05 10:19 Andreas Enge
2023-04-05 10:34 ` Andreas Enge
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Andreas Enge @ 2023-04-05 10:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: guix-devel
Hello,
something we have done recently in core-updates breaks the build of OpenJDK,
already at version 9. If someone could have a look, that would be great!
Andreas
/tmp/guix-build-openjdk-9.181.drv-0/source/hotspot/src/share/vm/opto/lcm.cpp: In function ‘bool accesses_heap_base_zone(Node*)’:
/tmp/guix-build-openjdk-9.181.drv-0/source/hotspot/src/share/vm/opto/lcm.cpp:42:35: error: ordered comparison of pointer with integer zero (‘address’ {aka ‘unsigned char*’} and ‘int’)
42 | if (Universe::narrow_oop_base() > 0) { // Implies UseCompressedOops.
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~
make[3]: *** [lib/CompileJvm.gmk:209: /tmp/guix-build-openjdk-9.181.drv-0/source/build/linux-x86_64-normal-server-release/hotspot/variant-server/libjvm/objs/lcm.o] Error 1
Hm, it might be enough to replace "> 0" by "!= NULL" ?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: OpenJDK in core-updates
2023-04-05 10:19 OpenJDK in core-updates Andreas Enge
@ 2023-04-05 10:34 ` Andreas Enge
2023-04-05 12:26 ` Andreas Enge
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Andreas Enge @ 2023-04-05 10:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: guix-devel
Am Wed, Apr 05, 2023 at 12:19:44PM +0200 schrieb Andreas Enge:
> Hm, it might be enough to replace "> 0" by "!= NULL" ?
Good guess, this is done in openjdk@10. I will give it a try.
Andreas
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: OpenJDK in core-updates
2023-04-05 10:34 ` Andreas Enge
@ 2023-04-05 12:26 ` Andreas Enge
2023-04-06 15:28 ` Andreas Enge
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Andreas Enge @ 2023-04-05 12:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: guix-devel
Next problem, hopefully fixed by the following patch:
diff -u -r openjdk-9.alt/hotspot/test/runtime/StackGuardPages/exeinvoke.c openjdk-9/hotspot/test/runtime/StackGuardPages/exeinvoke.c
--- openjdk-9.alt/hotspot/test/runtime/StackGuardPages/exeinvoke.c 2023-04-05 13:46:58.689964892 +0200
+++ openjdk-9/hotspot/test/runtime/StackGuardPages/exeinvoke.c 2023-04-05 14:15:52.435613325 +0200
@@ -67,8 +67,17 @@
longjmp(context, 1);
}
+static char* altstack = NULL;
+
void set_signal_handler() {
- static char altstack[SIGSTKSZ];
+ if (altstack == NULL) {
+ // Dynamically allocated in case SIGSTKSZ is not constant
+ altstack = (char*)malloc(SIGSTKSZ);
+ if (altstack == NULL) {
+ fprintf(stderr, "Test ERROR. Unable to malloc altstack space\n");
+ exit(7);
+ }
+ }
stack_t ss = {
.ss_size = SIGSTKSZ,
This is related to a change in glibc, and we have seen it in other places.
It is not new, so I do not quite understand how openjdk@9 compiled a few
weeks ago on core-updates and suddenly stopped to compile. At least openjdk@10
is also affected, and maybe later versions.
Andreas
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-04-06 15:28 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-04-05 10:19 OpenJDK in core-updates Andreas Enge
2023-04-05 10:34 ` Andreas Enge
2023-04-05 12:26 ` Andreas Enge
2023-04-06 15:28 ` Andreas Enge
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.