From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp11.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms9.migadu.com with LMTPS id +ObfIuBDF2SQrwAASxT56A (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 19 Mar 2023 18:18:24 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp11.migadu.com with LMTPS id QNzKIuBDF2R9HQEA9RJhRA (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 19 Mar 2023 18:18:24 +0100 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 634C12E141 for ; Sun, 19 Mar 2023 18:18:24 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=famulari.name header.s=mesmtp header.b=cqn1dX8E; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm2 header.b=nP1KYUu0; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1679246304; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:resent-cc:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references: list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post: dkim-signature; bh=HDbYHxfX67O8RNp4l5WkZpQJzNzmeSRQDxAW0sQhfIc=; b=gNGGGycAoZ4pjE7zb2r9rkNkV9nciAiVz62eMGgsTHCaHzYof1RHmUcBkTNA+TW5M9Rkq4 MZaXtntqgiqFDznjy1TJL2ObyyZeGIN/Gg8ZtMV+YAHAiPtypuF+RGAPC3cBjsnc40gRtd DtNFnamKujqLr6SUdG/oMLuPkCWv5zd8hdGXeePfDU9HXrFEiMnl5U2AFW/uf0oJrJmOZK Heu4BnzxpztcORKKk+nyVsYxKFrVxQEj4tG4kcXiCiihZXLVPiD2Yhm3NZcPltXwpd1mh/ IqAkVn9y77tzCjEuX7mHuWVIMFxUJuq54P/jzZ5M87ch6m6sTgBKt+n3TBOCLQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=famulari.name header.s=mesmtp header.b=cqn1dX8E; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm2 header.b=nP1KYUu0; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1679246304; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=WDaAaYXGK5T9AoLMoEqyMifRN/K+vg6juJ2kG9qIxAvoErvAYT+TJ8hZzpXokbrMyVLraV 32Ysmw2tgJcDlaLTu//7CTvSaPao967Q/w/fK84YVg/ejPY07/SpVFuuf5iI4ryDTZi8Ug 7vLgYszjAf7KjuMJKjeETtCiIFamqol8zJSPTCfKMpPQZDrRG81+9bgPrreGZgh3hmfdAg ucLQex6LWlb74Xcgm5WN/P/36gbA8Z/NrhtjZYuD2bEuYcyx+u9Tik8EAL5/YdUXdNPTSf gLHa1Una8UNXqa0AihjkJK6cj/SfOUQ1xdgFEJqray0Q3IwxaFaR2fqlsel7ow== Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pdwfT-0002uu-RX; Sun, 19 Mar 2023 13:18:03 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pdwfS-0002tz-N9 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Mar 2023 13:18:02 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pdwfS-0000Pc-Ez for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Mar 2023 13:18:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pdwfS-0001Ol-Ad for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Mar 2023 13:18:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#61989] [PATCH 00/11] Adding Gocryptfs (feature branch) Resent-From: Leo Famulari Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 19 Mar 2023 17:18:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 61989 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Efraim Flashner , Felix Lechner , 61989@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 61989-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B61989.16792462545335 (code B ref 61989); Sun, 19 Mar 2023 17:18:02 +0000 Received: (at 61989) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Mar 2023 17:17:34 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52638 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pdwf0-0001Nz-44 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 19 Mar 2023 13:17:34 -0400 Received: from wout5-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.21]:38487) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pdwez-0001Ni-4Z for 61989@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 19 Mar 2023 13:17:33 -0400 Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68AD4320082A; Sun, 19 Mar 2023 13:17:27 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 19 Mar 2023 13:17:27 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=cc:content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:sender :subject:subject:to:to; s=mesmtp; t=1679246247; x=1679332647; bh=HDbYHxfX67O8RNp4l5WkZpQJzNzmeSRQDxAW0sQhfIc=; b=cqn1dX8Euwkb nHExIUqhHwN/e5niKVCumLmXrsogw0KWypkbhq3dZJ9dDOrpOcDyFb+QiR39Cz1X TRPzMXKOvTs2Z3SYjooZDPYA/W8OOVBkNUWHa0ogYRvWDjXDcFfrYslT8DNEqQnk C5IzlnKOUZJ3lI7uRdprYC5dGSw8QyU= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:sender:subject :subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; t=1679246247; x=1679332647; bh=HDbYHxfX67O8R Np4l5WkZpQJzNzmeSRQDxAW0sQhfIc=; b=nP1KYUu0WpVxF+g+yYiNK978QvxSh Eg+0YaDgOnrKIG7QZksB2zqjUvFieq1XHDd4/aj3D0KWVntp4yM4IA8LOnn01ajb lFnofASEokjGkr574O6SQSzy2WoJvF8UrPzMCYU05D17iwc+etL8zcweeTRhltOW 736gX0Em0nmA0W8+D8UFxN48r7B2F8vL31oy/8647nGiBoZpba3FIHYxzKMThNBU rE109o+1HWkyHu2sj8jKmmxLKuzEmCZfbgVJ0/CR8LS9G4KcFaGGjZMdlLmfG572 fNyY9g/9ps008xSWzk5aaRm42jOHp9zBbhmJt6KvmjIw+VNTR7DKa+PSg== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvhedrvdefiedguddtvdcutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd enucfjughrpeffhffvuffkfhggtggujgesthdtredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepnfgvohcu hfgrmhhulhgrrhhiuceolhgvohesfhgrmhhulhgrrhhirdhnrghmvgeqnecuggftrfgrth htvghrnhepueekkedtffdvtddugeejgedtvefhueefiedvjeeitdeigedtveejvdejheff vefgnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomheplh gvohesfhgrmhhulhgrrhhirdhnrghmvg X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i819c4023:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Sun, 19 Mar 2023 13:17:26 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 19 Mar 2023 13:17:24 -0400 From: Leo Famulari Message-ID: References: <5fad9502-2744-4f5c-8056-cb7088b6cee0@app.fastmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 634C12E141 X-Spam-Score: -2.15 X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -2.15 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-TUID: 4LUdeNmNd5yL On Sun, Mar 19, 2023 at 10:51:51AM +0200, Efraim Flashner wrote: > As it currently stands on master, go-1.19 doesn't build for ppc64le. I > mentioned on IRC that it looks like the 'patch-gcc:lib phase in go-1.17 > but for ppc64le, but after trying a few different combinations it looks > to me more like the test failures on aarch64 (which I haven't looked at > in forever). > > Looking at it I'm convinced that we are missing patching something on > our end, and that these tests are probably supposed to pass. > > My suggestion is to skip the tests on go-1.17+ on ppc64le and adjust the > note that all the listed architectures should have their test suite > reviewed to figure out what we're missing. There's something about the > internal linking on non-x86 architectures that needs investigating. Okay, thanks for taking a look. Since this failure exists on master, I don't think that fixing it is in scope for this branch, although it certainly should be fixed. Or we disable the support on ppc64le for now.