From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org> Received: from mp2.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:303:e16b::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms13.migadu.com with LMTPS id MNTUHD6thmddDwEAe85BDQ:P1 (envelope-from <guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org>) for <larch@yhetil.org>; Tue, 14 Jan 2025 18:30:22 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:303:e16b::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2.migadu.com with LMTPS id MNTUHD6thmddDwEAe85BDQ (envelope-from <guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org>) for <larch@yhetil.org>; Tue, 14 Jan 2025 19:30:22 +0100 X-Envelope-To: larch@yhetil.org Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=bokr.com header.s=easymail header.b="dedYd8/9"; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=bokr.com header.s=easymail header.b=l7gQpNCz; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=none ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1736879421; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:list-id:list-help: list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=/bu/GtzwnEOPmoReboMedDXELiByguiW3yp+b/ADBYY=; b=jUMoO0ew3Wf1vsZGYSxvT7sxJjjKB+G856EA2nGr7cv8onkhl4y4CgVFu1Oo1qmMxW7W/H LkGZaDs6pi5645yibofqvbl2qbGiFd/z9qL2CFUrAAKa+OjAl72zxZ+ohys5y3NGHp4QyT Ph1kKEZ47ASFCo+ME2I5fi9DdyqFuzAX8/55H9q3NVxyQ+L81mPuFnm55RekmdCR1nVPOE kw0FyX2fXxW4WVaAVohCExLrN3hE2M1WwEkKVDC1jLtleHPVKOvpjOEN1mvHKgHhL1nwxZ zeoRwx8kh1rFs8qWTXlcw659DdwOFB2e27cqQ/XdeoIe+1iTYaTdy5ZYFA9FPw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=bokr.com header.s=easymail header.b="dedYd8/9"; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=bokr.com header.s=easymail header.b=l7gQpNCz; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=none ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1736879421; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=iOqE8pvisxGWNkuE/zJ/YL69w6Sl84620MPblOiJDF6wD4w3FZiw0CdRyOJHuMM3p9G4Sh RVUYSlqcweARx1lQ6fPmO242VSCcrAzXOkTtSUA8r7xlstzK03JLaHg+yCuXecz3VMNnvD FdpDORw4m+F97n22zDLwPKirQwLAHxyi5QUNY5wFakviuohKzyUflZsyu68nUuMaH0XAbY lIPN+ma6RdlAzuMfOZjyBB+9vrwOgd5ksngz8azdxXyB81f1SiWbpQnn989d3h8wyE7ZdL 4/x+ynFwSlCWvXGAvux588A0/+/TNiMCpeoWiphNmQcyRqvqM5cMCfHuOakV0A== Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 432205310 for <larch@yhetil.org>; Tue, 14 Jan 2025 19:30:21 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org>) id 1tXlfK-0006cY-M2; Tue, 14 Jan 2025 13:29:26 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <bokr@bokr.com>) id 1tXlfH-0006b6-RX for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Jan 2025 13:29:24 -0500 Received: from mailout.easymail.ca ([64.68.200.34]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <bokr@bokr.com>) id 1tXlfF-00060u-GW; Tue, 14 Jan 2025 13:29:23 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailout.easymail.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id E98B861451; Tue, 14 Jan 2025 18:29:16 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=bokr.com; s=easymail; t=1736879357; bh=xYYTko0JnNW4J7iK9pAJ+xgFZugZ9Z8Tf8xv9TxeOA4=; h=From:Date:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=dedYd8/9Fb/qKZ36hAg/LhRDv2bI6L2V0NaOz3n3cwc1uejOJcNxjD8fTCfJlvADG pbjG7Jtsb8jsRYWZYDH4+XhF9fpnsLmMKgMxRGT5peF0bL3mqz9cLqOfmciB7ZyxZa jnZsSrgjP19Qc2aw0rUONBuGQuX2V50vQ4t4ecN2CoBljpmyae/h4ppUMr2kWQG2rz MSjExvnoJtDqp/EPn6YUaxKtkgrLBcsKW5gxrSBHIS1cTSGdcwJ4fKqyi4oWWEsK6P Odz9AkDKqG7UmFHjiB+JdHoaGDctMFLuRkmPMeeWdT/3h5i5NwxsLKm5uySOZSA1XE WKTkRe4HuIIxw== X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at emo07-pco.easydns.vpn Received: from mailout.easymail.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (emo07-pco.easydns.vpn [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZuNPQD0rCKVg; Tue, 14 Jan 2025 18:29:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (unknown [50.208.209.153]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mailout.easymail.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1C590612DC; Tue, 14 Jan 2025 18:29:15 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=bokr.com; s=easymail; t=1736879356; bh=xYYTko0JnNW4J7iK9pAJ+xgFZugZ9Z8Tf8xv9TxeOA4=; h=From:Date:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=l7gQpNCzKJS4Fq0tih3IiJY+HfC19NTSzyto+OcD+IJ+PhpXAbF6tYOcKtLqEXPH7 b59oq5IPb+RNOrBcY62Tf0VqIbjQ3Xy/pA1ODjr/PwN2jNI4UTOq8+xZBcDG/OCCQM EkSMNhjZ64d59UqgcR8gbLfUGGY8h1STk3nVbxNwrZNC+QpRl6R3zPSNIblhKZ8O6M 0P0AnH9WSzZMhgdw9XnJIljtr3ZiBiM4LXdCqUtRxFyNYS71ARH65AjbzYC/GiFNoB 9/7lgrMb57uNjMy5eSS5TaAW2d0j5nC6Y52dhsJSOthEDagduf1B3buvVF/BiJH7KK ilVhgFIkbGwxw== From: bokr@bokr.com Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2025 10:28:59 -0800 To: Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com> Cc: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>, Guix Devel <guix-devel@gnu.org>, Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il>, Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net>, Christopher Baines <mail@cbaines.net>, GNU Guix maintainers <guix-maintainers@gnu.org> Subject: Re: Guix Common Document process (v7) (was: Request-For-Comment, RFC) Message-ID: <Z4as66vcQeOlI14k@BRL14v1> References: <87h6m7yrfh.fsf@gmail.com> <87ttafn3p2.fsf@gmail.com> <87zfk229h0.fsf@gnu.org> <87bjwfh6p8.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <87bjwfh6p8.fsf@gmail.com> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=64.68.200.34; envelope-from=bokr@bokr.com; helo=mailout.easymail.ca X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." <guix-devel.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>, <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel> List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>, <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 432205310 X-Migadu-Scanner: mx13.migadu.com X-Migadu-Spam-Score: 3.86 X-Spam-Score: 3.86 X-TUID: urbh8pfNdrHM Hi Simon, and anyone interested, Synopsis: 1) SFTN: apologies for mistakenly introducing offtopic tangentials in earlier post ;-/ 2) IWBN: if links/urls in the GCD document had base names for wget automatic file naming. 3) IWBN: if there were a guile-glossary.html AND a guix-glossary.html AND 4) IWBN: if the GCD html document had hover-hints with glossary excerpts and links thereto. 5) IWBN: if importantly exact references had sha256sum hashes as, or embedded in, the basenames. 6) IWBN: to provide links for bewildered visitors to explanatory documentation, e.g. [1]-[6] 7) SFTN:= Sorry For The Noise, IWBN:= It Would Be Nice, GCD:= Guix Common Document [1] https://guix.gnu.org/manual/devel/ [2] https://guix.gnu.org/manual/en/html_node [3] https://guix.gnu.org/manual/en/html_node/Concept-Index.html [4] https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/manual/ [5] https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/manual/html_node/index.html [6] https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/manual/html_node/Concept-Index.html I like glossaries (4), but [3] and [6] are excellent, and provide more info -- but not glossary definitions. Quick, What's a thread? A fiber? A continuation? Wayland protocol? BTW, I think IWBN to rename the Concept-Index.html files with Guile- or Guix- prefixes in case someone wgets them :) People can use [1] and [4] to download different formats, and e.g. get a single file html, which is nice for Ctl-f searching, as Simon has pointed out. The html_node ones may lessen waits where bandwidth is low/expensive. Might mention that the guix cookbook (updated?) might be viewable something like: info -f <repo-dir>/guix/doc/guix-cookbook.texi for those who have cloned the guix repo. Well, I'll leave it at that. Thanks for reading :) Cheers, -- Bengt Richter On +2025-01-10 01:07:47 +0100, Simon Tournier wrote: > Hi all, > > On Tue, 07 Jan 2025 at 11:40, Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> wrote: > > >> The submission is: <https://issues.guix.gnu.org/74736#22>. > > > > And now v6! https://issues.guix.gnu.org/74736#27 > > See v7: https://issues.guix.gnu.org/74736#44 > > > Even better if we can finalize before Guix Days so: > > > > discussion period ending on Jan. 14th > > deliberation period ending on Jan. 28th > > > > How does that sound? > > It sounds good to me. > > Please make your voice heard. Especially if the document appears to you > unclear. All voice counts! Your voice is important if you feel part of > the Guix community; don’t be shy. :-) > > Cheers, > simon >