From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp10.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms5.migadu.com with LMTPS id SFDwDZbhhGLjgwAAbAwnHQ (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 18 May 2022 14:07:50 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp10.migadu.com with LMTPS id 8F0EDZbhhGIdrAAAG6o9tA (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 18 May 2022 14:07:50 +0200 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F12AD3BF83 for ; Wed, 18 May 2022 14:07:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:43824 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nrISy-0000jK-7Z for larch@yhetil.org; Wed, 18 May 2022 08:07:48 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35302) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nrISE-0000j3-Ay for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 18 May 2022 08:07:02 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:37114) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nrISD-0001RU-Tx for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 18 May 2022 08:07:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nrISD-000832-Or for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 18 May 2022 08:07:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#55431] [PATCH] guix: cpu: recognize other architectures. Resent-From: Efraim Flashner Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 18 May 2022 12:07:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 55431 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Julien Lepiller Cc: 55431-done@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 55431-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D55431.165287560130904 (code D ref 55431); Wed, 18 May 2022 12:07:01 +0000 Received: (at 55431-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 May 2022 12:06:41 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59244 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nrIRs-00082O-N4 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 18 May 2022 08:06:40 -0400 Received: from flashner.co.il ([178.62.234.194]:51914) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nrIRr-00082A-GD for 55431-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 18 May 2022 08:06:40 -0400 Received: from localhost (unknown [31.210.180.235]) by flashner.co.il (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 40E874035A; Wed, 18 May 2022 12:06:33 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 18 May 2022 15:05:38 +0300 From: Efraim Flashner Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: Efraim Flashner , Julien Lepiller , 55431-done@debbugs.gnu.org References: <20220515191132.288dc60d@sybil.lepiller.eu> <005DC196-6142-48CF-A82E-D532D6500597@lepiller.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="iKSlTBexaF5UQQs7" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <005DC196-6142-48CF-A82E-D532D6500597@lepiller.eu> X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x41AAE7DCCA3D8351 X-PGP-Key: https://flashner.co.il/~efraim/efraim_flashner.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-To: larch@yhetil.org X-Migadu-Country: US ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1652875670; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:resent-cc:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references: list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post; bh=q+sHFiOdfraj3ZTPgvyWkljZNHimQCGasNQHkLa79nQ=; b=k5U1P9avrZ5L/gwzURrF2g1y21JWVdmTpmGr8nro5+AlaYmM2QiPLlsNK0jB0bsMeH0p20 deQCQ/f+gQSUUy44+AhTTnBTxgfryNFuZLdo1qLEsc3Bf8wLDPxH2taUvJMMygY6iMZQmM UFepPaPvYwf8hUflUeFcA6ViagZO/1ffVzPx4QkgNCc8DlmRIeEp//AM7IgbdSBIWbQW/n MjCcnDs3ljqway7yGKVgPevoFXAGCi35IKL65qXf5ONkIcVMlmlZrwCVWNLshyxaxipDVP UF3SE3SZvz8PP4ZuVE1ISwHHoQA90o+pzNHKwd5Lkgu/pnjEj+q0mzohAWE2ug== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1652875670; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=Sx1bQ4JSuXK+7TlHUg5uj+10AZKcSArRF4cA3sX2YnOu3Xd733AN81I0JUuE7li9/dQ+nq fZaK/SDVCE4Q05bD4O+Vrr4SNxHMVi3BFkKMA5e1jmO6WGGj1lx6GbLV6Lt9n3Ovf3BnCG 9NZRDsDfjLru94hpQmXvF0/CWJx9qnGVmqaDq2qkGO3q/T0AK8/g3QhARmzSg1OUShBUPU iusTJWA5UbOUOZ5Qar2HDI12XcFFjT2162I+DmFtIVy9KobG4XmdnFvqINnlP+QC1lmafq UFtOBR3bGRt0nLKZVTLXC4lwCq7ueQgDDJKRWADYdv+K0zjRnHSN9m1Otfs3oQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -5.74 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Queue-Id: F12AD3BF83 X-Spam-Score: -5.74 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: D+NGIfEMjKy3 --iKSlTBexaF5UQQs7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, May 17, 2022 at 05:55:38PM +0200, Julien Lepiller wrote: > Thanks for fixing that anyway :) >=20 > I was only interested in it because it made me unable to reconfigure my s= ystems. I don't care too much about the --tune code, and I don't understand= what you suggest. Do you mean to create "x86 on x86_64" as a separate arch= itecture? Or as a --tune target? >=20 As part of the autotuning process. GCC internally groups i686 and x86_64 together when determining how to tune for --march=3Dnative, and I'm pretty sure I've added some i686 hardware for AMD when I was adding autotuning support for AMD CPUs. Its similar for aarch64 and armhf, there are armhf targets internally that accept armv8.X-a targets, so there's no need to limit armhf tuning to armv7. --=20 Efraim Flashner =D7=90=D7=A4=D7=A8=D7=99=D7=9D = =D7=A4=D7=9C=D7=A9=D7=A0=D7=A8 GPG key =3D A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted --iKSlTBexaF5UQQs7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEoov0DD5VE3JmLRT3Qarn3Mo9g1EFAmKE4Q8ACgkQQarn3Mo9 g1GwGhAAn+e0qxapvSIPS+59MiRv5f/waAz+YXrYi1iHtn1rrj8uVBCh1/BuX8TS bOSCVSyVT46RGb7ZsOuuNWIif5V0D0/MHB1+jMrN1H1Klvt0R8KRFVRIPwf6DFnE fvKZjBeFrQW5gZROVlgj7l42/DTG6h15IAjmTSOisRJ5Eesom/IjYcPWWxCfxOo/ BuRdwgcajsqwh/meljwMYtfurdYxgXTw9yyqA7B4632QGY8vKjRbWlJVZ+W3V6Ky mn3Jg7CSHwY6Y+bR3PlujrawXX+qRt8GMJyxRqUkgmffVXcRDChpkRmN9zZh5tLx UvQwm6AszY+gj4s9yHOvY/bRKEzyxigas3MWyWyZqPqFJfQmhb++MIOCiuPwo2F1 nbUDNF18Lbq+GlK48TcCBjlpkf9gdOVbjVHSHKqiOaRXomZniFL8FYQlzy6DnJ46 UGpjOQV/xI4dw0NJNWxOHiAiysl0xXmLEIZ30HkzKSU8md0QLM/55MsCiD30kOa/ C/3peZEGwUr8FBsFUYNEhyg0dbKC+1iNm8xKQ2Nn7Uhr/PgIc2D9oeemwJ+dUwQL Bw2FNwbyjOvVO9sp0Xyr78fMgCIeJyHMImw3lDnOW6iN/mipEV6tpZQPBq40fMiv s5ATCUmanm6mHHxoUaCFDNfkmTREdfZVgJx63zJnLjrcmTkX31M= =CIYm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --iKSlTBexaF5UQQs7--