From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp10.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms0.migadu.com with LMTPS id +FOmOs07V2I5CAEAgWs5BA (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 13 Apr 2022 23:08:29 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp10.migadu.com with LMTPS id MDhkM807V2LIcwEAG6o9tA (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 13 Apr 2022 23:08:29 +0200 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 39FF2388C9 for ; Wed, 13 Apr 2022 23:08:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:40778 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nekDy-0004vi-TX for larch@yhetil.org; Wed, 13 Apr 2022 17:08:26 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:38182) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nekDl-0004vS-S4 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Apr 2022 17:08:13 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:60296) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nekDa-0004b1-3C for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Apr 2022 17:08:13 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nekDZ-0007T7-Us for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Apr 2022 17:08:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#34453] [PATCH] build guile-static with guile-2.0 Resent-From: Efraim Flashner Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2022 21:08:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 34453 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: zimoun Cc: 34453@debbugs.gnu.org, 34427@debbugs.gnu.org, Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Received: via spool by 34453-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B34453.164988406828680 (code B ref 34453); Wed, 13 Apr 2022 21:08:01 +0000 Received: (at 34453) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Apr 2022 21:07:48 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54192 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nekDM-0007SR-9d for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 13 Apr 2022 17:07:48 -0400 Received: from flashner.co.il ([178.62.234.194]:53554) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nekDK-0007S8-Di; Wed, 13 Apr 2022 17:07:46 -0400 Received: from localhost (ool-ad022d7f.dyn.optonline.net [173.2.45.127]) by flashner.co.il (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8DB9B4011D; Wed, 13 Apr 2022 21:07:40 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2022 00:07:07 +0300 From: Efraim Flashner Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: Efraim Flashner , zimoun , Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= , 34453@debbugs.gnu.org, 34427@debbugs.gnu.org References: <20190212091740.GB3284@macbook41> <87mumvhg5u.fsf@gnu.org> <86o816394u.fsf_-_@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="J/Gp50LlWZ2i/fjx" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <86o816394u.fsf_-_@gmail.com> X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x41AAE7DCCA3D8351 X-PGP-Key: https://flashner.co.il/~efraim/efraim_flashner.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-To: larch@yhetil.org X-Migadu-Country: US ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1649884109; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:resent-cc:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references: list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post; bh=PT1dER6OHwlH8pyjfnfOeMtuNpus/JqEyGawoLlhphs=; b=HYvLSMwLqXLxJfQ/+1/PXn36aI/gmfagGp2OpX4AosKQrDnYmbExMH698tkdS/8cA8XB8a Q2OmJGMpm0YCam0v2ELQ3PgGKonDtZFhfIGDDZy0Q1oL7vlACvFNLAl1YtVm8wfsm6bp0t vZayQa49fnQ95ZqwonkUPZSekmUuYxZe9pj8SoZenRABFCmM7+1PdRMhceXKv2sO51P1c7 cfVvP4HtAjNOQPXgaX7p5xNi/4Nwzf00FADKEHc7frCq3wc3bLeliIwsolN4IZhv5UYKV/ Xvli4sKnPL8i27S/LVizxSXJbAtB08irxVTjG6RxI7KW4oi3JZ/7X3N07z2HIg== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1649884109; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=H9pByUx3GXN3KjdmIAFV/sRcWMt37E29nEXan6mrJONgshqtooMs/n8tH99AtEO/tnqwCa zp7EgeCA4OxJ1MyMx2jS9+CuBaaZnY5eVtoNa/hh1CyJFN3Lnzeh6FgPw6gvJaKuuLIkUm fbuIeUhnEMh6kQv2obgidXqvXCyZRJ2w/vrdDgOEkHYotXhBmN3Fny2TVWhOR/hJRE//+i xmiVlgt586lihnniVyXThSYzsfLKoLTmFPPRF4yWxXH8/PCd4zTpatbaNfDNeeyUn31IfD gg8d0L99F4+asCAqv6ckAh7tovY7w3VEyIzfRY6i1S2gNC14EBKdT76s+auL4Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -3.95 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 39FF2388C9 X-Spam-Score: -3.95 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: KBi9gX3Ett1P --J/Gp50LlWZ2i/fjx Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 12:10:09PM +0200, zimoun wrote: > Hi, >=20 > What is the status of this old patch #34453? >=20 > http://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/34453 >=20 >=20 > On Sat, 16 Feb 2019 at 17:06, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: > > Efraim Flashner skribis: > > > >> When experimenting I found that using guile@2.0 as a base for > >> guile-static, the resulting guile-static didn't segfault on the target > >> architecture. > > > > As discussed in , I would rather > > fix the segfault in 2.2 than move back to 2.0 and effectively delay the > > problem. >=20 > Note that #34427 is still open. We can probably drop it. We'll pick it back up again if/when it comes up again. --=20 Efraim Flashner =D7=90=D7=A4=D7=A8=D7=99=D7=9D = =D7=A4=D7=9C=D7=A9=D7=A0=D7=A8 GPG key =3D A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted --J/Gp50LlWZ2i/fjx Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEoov0DD5VE3JmLRT3Qarn3Mo9g1EFAmJXO3UACgkQQarn3Mo9 g1HwMA//f9hAjbYjSkH1gzCJsBBTo2jaCC1GuxpQ33pW6xlqcxTx2zXr76FTbL0s k/KZ84iMffe/DKB6JgUQsfskiLb+GsDjR06j3QfTuzt5xj+pgqv3mMYRGemlsRq0 EDQGzTk/zA/9YqxQQcTYcP25dSocA8zq5HII2Ki2rnI9Y/FjBXrJpDd9vcdcSlQa UMunCFENqjTHFEnRkylgYufTmiGIwx3ZcyGZUcr4nUKa0YXLzaOohPDoQlfVFH2t AnBMCkUGTzi7ZizKPulQg286DCfNxCdWoGjmD69PJyvhD/tOmwWnLZFzVgbLPCpi OqbiiqCUpLBzv6D4nfdkdhuz72BOPQ6Bjo/D3mUIT0x27hiONdtZymx06buFk+Yw +cD1Lknstc+hiZsEfY0dOfnZtgYhoxesbjMrjsvALBynrZVtjYz7qsRZ9XqcrW9j 6dvZsn3JHf7pcAwKZfEau1AJr/JRcwglt17yMTJJLDUdZ2AQu5xgJ4hCiJKR5PVu AURl0wIrbN4ugFUZDevELQIbUaNCHw6yLus8+oVEsgF8cqvsItLoVlJZHucqH/M4 dUsMhqmAzlzSi/+gWWmYNWO+eaRmZI1qfEG6kPf8pnj5zldajpdp2BMuPHxmF6Dh z1uuXETSnz3FZMpMUgDarFyICY/6NdF7haV/nnV1lXxHpJb7Yeo= =gEp1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --J/Gp50LlWZ2i/fjx--