On Wed, Mar 30, 2022 at 01:36:34PM +0200, Maxime Devos wrote:
> Arun Isaac schreef op wo 30-03-2022 om 14:53 [+0530]:
> >             ,@(cond
> > +              ((target-riscv64?)
> > +               '((add-after 'unpack 'force-bootstrap
> > +                   (lambda _
> > +                     ;; gsl ships with an old configure script that does not
> > +                     ;; support riscv64. Regenerate it.
> > +                     (delete-file "configure")))))
> > +
> 
> WDYT of making this unconditional?  Two benefits:
> 
>   * if Guix is ported to another new architecture,
>     then no changes are necessary to the package definition.
> 
>   * 'configure' and 'Makefile.in' are not source code,
>     and more difficult to audit for things like malware than
>     'configure.ac' and 'Makefile.am'.

This can be with a TODO for core-updates. gsl itself has about 2000
dependant packages.

That said, I'm not convinced about unilaterally removing configure
unless we make it a policy to remove it. Also, I haven't had trouble
with building gsl on riscv64-linux without this patch.


-- 
Efraim Flashner   <efraim@flashner.co.il>   אפרים פלשנר
GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D  14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted