From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp11.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms0.migadu.com with LMTPS id gFk6AISs9WH2/gAAgWs5BA (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 29 Jan 2022 22:07:16 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp11.migadu.com with LMTPS id ONQKOYOs9WEwMgAA9RJhRA (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 29 Jan 2022 22:07:15 +0100 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8A1F3422F3 for ; Sat, 29 Jan 2022 22:07:15 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1]:58386 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nDuwE-0000m6-OV for larch@yhetil.org; Sat, 29 Jan 2022 16:07:14 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:50184) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nDuw3-0000lb-PE for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Jan 2022 16:07:03 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:42042) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nDuw2-00044e-HV for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Jan 2022 16:07:03 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nDuw2-0002Fo-DJ for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Jan 2022 16:07:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#52943: Cannot build guix as part of guix system reconfigure after commit 224d437fb4 on aarch64 Resent-From: Leo Famulari Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2022 21:07:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 52943 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Pierre Langlois X-Debbugs-Original-Cc: vagrant@debian.org, aikokyle@gmail.com, bug-guix@gnu.org, 52943@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 52943-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B52943.16434904048630 (code B ref 52943); Sat, 29 Jan 2022 21:07:02 +0000 Received: (at 52943) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Jan 2022 21:06:44 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34944 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nDuvj-0002F7-Ds for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 29 Jan 2022 16:06:43 -0500 Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.29]:47937) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nDuvZ-0002EQ-Qg for 52943@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 29 Jan 2022 16:06:34 -0500 Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id C64515C00A3; Sat, 29 Jan 2022 16:06:28 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Sat, 29 Jan 2022 16:06:28 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=cc:cc:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:sender :subject:subject:to:to; s=mesmtp; bh=n1oGs3TZ6ayZ1kc5zz/VOVyGDS9 MltzsswKYswgasfY=; b=XZStJl2IpqVOToL95WnqtfpBhLw0JmpRQjQJmSUXXSK fb23lmDF562XasN0PC+K16Gha4B4CjJHviRxPDQ24Vv3jUPL+CLWJI2HBoVpLukO a7CYF0MKzkT4HHoAkFX/bwLBWLcWWu4jvBV0WZ8aTWREF6uoReejlqo7ecD4AqsA = DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:date:date:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=n1oGs3TZ6ayZ1kc5z z/VOVyGDS9MltzsswKYswgasfY=; b=KrjLzeAorJGN1JwPnS6v0h0ZapvsUcMHW J+7gYyTKA0nePvpc8Y2CmJ5Ge9g7JSrLFJdLYXRdTnmkaCq6iYKRWcKu+13/waYd NNMtRU4PjkVMwjcP19ViytrVTQnpeputLwdRT+evnbTE7gk1WmcHtviMuN/OBTbK hjLPpt53EQqBa2iyEiDj7wHPcG2tYjXQLT5iQvb7+Z9J1UnAA6jMFJXiivfAKzGx xVBHpOXElX1SuMc/eIhBxQPBjlzCuhM5k+CjEziR9/C9jNihkuewK0ZZ/ESBpxKz z37UPGCZvA4jRCpophLLU2WkWNczByiZfCEXSFtaKV6hrLjtdtl2A== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvvddrfeejgddugeeiucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepfffhvffukfhfgggtuggjsehttdertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefnvghoucfh rghmuhhlrghrihcuoehlvghosehfrghmuhhlrghrihdrnhgrmhgvqeenucggtffrrghtth gvrhhnpedvvddugefffeeitddthfefvdeuhffgkeeikeegkeevteeghfeftefggeeuudff ieenucffohhmrghinhepghhnuhdrohhrghenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurf grrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehlvghosehfrghmuhhlrghrihdrnhgrmhgv X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Sat, 29 Jan 2022 16:06:28 -0500 (EST) Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2022 16:06:26 -0500 From: Leo Famulari Message-ID: References: <87o84lcyk1.fsf@gmail.com> <874k65rukb.fsf@gmx.com> <87czksa40e.fsf@gmail.com> <87y23f7yw1.fsf@gmail.com> <878rvefb54.fsf@gmx.com> <87bl09d2wi.fsf@yucca> <87k0eva5k3.fsf@yucca> <87r18qb6l2.fsf@gmx.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87r18qb6l2.fsf@gmx.com> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: vagrant@debian.org, aikokyle@gmail.com, 52943@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1643490435; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:resent-cc:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references: list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post: dkim-signature; bh=n1oGs3TZ6ayZ1kc5zz/VOVyGDS9MltzsswKYswgasfY=; b=fBYs7sHRHhiZzFm09BxOk2tObn/CQGOm4uPtsDVvCJ413uu2wO93sexQzl3ZsehLl8wVGy Zb5Q/GkCYFdT2rYjobfRelQ0+a6VNbPL7n2wloRXTDGdNZU9SCF1s88F+I5sO1sEvChoMu befrvIZ5GRrqug3h36bwy5a5l56HLxgXvjwTTZ17OsGYaYXBGacYzRf59SciLQIkyzWqls jFVBIBPoQakanG+rFThvUn0z05/vGiAuEPL+UWXeXD5wsYBuFJrPcykTqeLuLN5psx980r zbTVIrUdAtYPRBn6QfVEQiJKtGDnIBp5J6Khey5cX0fcFmksRPDV+eHT9bA5NA== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1643490435; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=dFjbNfTfi6krV1LY31iuqCIK9IilqikDX0UE2JjvBZCEbTKcqQNyOVHtbnZVi5iT0KNb72 mXrOmn0a+gKVBG8nDJj1djt6cUGkyNI7+Qm6b3F5e9wq/I/eb0r2o6q3jl+sVfwwX4TQFU dKTurFmwNT9jMWcxyvzf+BWE5rd8AUD+Dhf7zS++AyLsH+SkD5TwPiShh0uhoXLGWNncA8 wJJdmBdZ3WLuERbXnPaqq7koPNRrX0Vv+S45MT/Jqh2UriG40dCwgDKqPdixz8AAC7z380 4QRVSrNoX8Oix/eA88HKkZ4ymSBlRs5sgWy/k0rs1NsarZNQHuWQe3SSjE/gsA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=famulari.name header.s=mesmtp header.b=XZStJl2I; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm1 header.b=KrjLzeAo; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -3.53 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=famulari.name header.s=mesmtp header.b=XZStJl2I; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm1 header.b=KrjLzeAo; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 8A1F3422F3 X-Spam-Score: -3.53 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: pBaJAOrILz7d On Sat, Jan 29, 2022 at 08:54:24PM +0000, Pierre Langlois wrote: > > Since the 'guix' package still does not build on aarch64, I'm reopening > > this bug. > > Oh it doesn't? What hash are you on? I'm not using aarch64, so I can't give a commit hash. I am observing the build farm's support for aarch64. > I'm currently on b14a1cdef571c0901f716f4e752a97e8028ccbbd on a RockPro64 > and it's working OK, maybe something changed since then although this > hash isn't very old. I see the farm does not have any substitutes yet. As you point out, the build farm cannot build it: https://ci.guix.gnu.org/search?query=spec%3Amaster+system%3Aaarch64-linux+guix-1.3.0 Maybe it's a problem with in the 'guix' package, maybe in the some other package. But the effect for users is the same, and they report things like this: https://issues.guix.gnu.org/53616