From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43263) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d6GZ7-00053c-Rf for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 04 May 2017 09:13:06 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d6GZ3-0005ac-SN for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 04 May 2017 09:13:05 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:55507) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d6GZ3-0005aX-Ny for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 04 May 2017 09:13:01 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d6GZ3-0005gC-J0 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 04 May 2017 09:13:01 -0400 Subject: bug#26758: [PATCH] gnu: gnome-shell: Patch CVE-2017-8288. References: <2mJLT7Z/wQdanXzCpACTLW@bec4dusrlz0aOI14CUJvM> Resent-Message-ID: Date: Thu, 04 May 2017 08:12:01 -0500 From: rennes In-Reply-To: <20170503223147.GA12175@jasmine> (from leo@famulari.name on Wed May 3 17:31:47 2017) Message-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; DelSp=Yes; Format=Flowed Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Leo Famulari Cc: 26758@debbugs.gnu.org Hello Leo, > Thanks! Do we need to graft it, or can we apply the patch directly to > gnome-shell? What would need to be rebuilt if we applied the patch > directly? >=20 I did both tests: the first apply the patch directly, lasted more than =20 twelve hours; the second to create the procedure gnome-shell/fixed and =20 it did not take more than 10 minutes. I read about the subject, https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/manual/html_node/Security-Updates.html but I still do not understand the way to determine how much needs to be =20 rebuilt! HTH=