From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms0.migadu.com with LMTPS id cKxfLt2WkGC9PgEAgWs5BA (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 04 May 2021 02:35:41 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2 with LMTPS id 2BcJKt2WkGCcXAAAB5/wlQ (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 04 May 2021 00:35:41 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 70646338A1 for ; Tue, 4 May 2021 02:35:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:44418 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ldj2K-0005fr-H9 for larch@yhetil.org; Mon, 03 May 2021 20:35:40 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:51826) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ldj1m-0005fW-Tg for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 03 May 2021 20:35:06 -0400 Received: from wout5-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.21]:46757) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ldj1j-00014b-9l for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 03 May 2021 20:35:06 -0400 Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41DCC1B82; Mon, 3 May 2021 20:34:59 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 03 May 2021 20:34:59 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to; s=mesmtp; bh=vHa/zTHWGJICjmU8yRaAj8DUjjKHDO8K4pkKBBGNfYI=; b=U5P52V1MRXSg ZthEhqklTxJB748c7+KU5r8uo5YNbtw5/RccEqlOtX7Fgn+Nkg+QwmkFfQuqe7M3 BDMZfAcR5HU6hbB7KKBOS3e05oLoKMnbfKQHawWrRrzl7Qo+zw4w4eMw6ywylhJ4 0HDWPYqm53WF+p3FQCsAwmrVojaaRJI= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=vHa/zTHWGJICjmU8yRaAj8DUjjKHDO8K4pkKBBGNf YI=; b=UjSARUgm8GoGna311dq+Gx9GZY/mS7y27twa4D0VxGCjPMyqAiaIcz/T9 kwe7fCtQUMOEQUzR+1QQXh+Wdy7GbWmJQtSMnaoME9hUKdLK43KeLlWZ1V/4MVdE MINCaZ/1/4xbLjEyennSuGKn/hKLf012V5zhtijh0ZcWZ8x6boPDelzPp1b6Z1sB 1A0b0Jx+eo3VSjK1uSyjLrszD4QIBhDq0xZM5K8W/5ToAVRxVMtJwFijdRGJJ5Rx XiaVX7fRj3xH6ZHkBCGxf+FZrvYEFMFRBpH5LXEaK39MeHiTa2nXif6UKq8o/Nec 0r0f9BqCYewd7rCsXnNjTar5SIFqw== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrvdefhedgfeeiucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepfffhvffukfhfgggtugfgjgesthekredttddtjeenucfhrhhomhepnfgvohcu hfgrmhhulhgrrhhiuceolhgvohesfhgrmhhulhgrrhhirdhnrghmvgeqnecuggftrfgrth htvghrnhepgeejgeeghedtudfgffdutddvffefffejkeffffevffehgedvvdeutdffkeej jeejnecukfhppedujedvrdehiedrvdefrddvheefnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptd enucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomheplhgvohesfhgrmhhulhgrrhhirdhnrghmvg X-ME-Proxy: Received: from localhost (unknown [172.56.23.253]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Mon, 3 May 2021 20:34:58 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 3 May 2021 20:34:54 -0400 From: Leo Famulari To: Tissevert Subject: Re: GNU Guix 1.3.0rc1 available for testing! Message-ID: References: <877dkjovl6.fsf@gmail.com> <20210503213856.7ac66c26@pine.local> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20210503213856.7ac66c26@pine.local> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=64.147.123.21; envelope-from=leo@famulari.name; helo=wout5-smtp.messagingengine.com X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: guix-devel , Maxim Cournoyer Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1620088541; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:list-id:list-help: list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=vHa/zTHWGJICjmU8yRaAj8DUjjKHDO8K4pkKBBGNfYI=; b=MyG6Ntxb2ZBJlsgG3c5DKAlWPRR39odqKBGNQ926Hfsb+b+5TXHmPbzTuOlxQGbdhj+6oT 8jRt7L+xdzqdqH9vSaVm/JXHD9fOxlXPz8jMMge4gLv8Jt0yu25JbHCAeSCFw/ZZGoXons 8SUvm3nEu7ArJxJUW0hrjEN61Kz3mO3DgOxYdzMVoQPnoQO2yWd5YQDeCEWfPzLqS/6V08 l61dB+JGKMX214Jyzac6ZiOQeXbWlyMQZavakSG6HfXC4OHw+alxxhFSYd4jA70AMlCmCi ZSmolHF3mXMb51l3s3bHnYdpAQoK+cMLOXRlr1zJ4Nm7b8GLHI9aHSUlDPMw4Q== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1620088541; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=exbwXS8WiRGHae357+C6RUXB/bg/9VKwbBX4yqXzLsAdWEALAxdv7VeK1pnbMBkQizR9Fz 1xVXy6ngFOLA64NgFc5kBFEOeBz83VZ9VwruC8UrBV6iqNvGbsPyYzV1SqZp31Av899CLa XILrWhvgwC1rg59m6lzEj1yBPyGaE3jZB99yCPsGvW7TKP19EGlsfO7aXvTJYlvuCaur3d RSZwE42qUqnHf8ZZfg/dRFwuotWeb0dHd0YVMw9k8mWE1w2ekxDEb4ZwTVKlja8V3MCqpd VzekAdKpf1TuBzPbztHkpSSzXlIsm+OJrZIM8hcTgXfvOGWIukYspCscfMNASQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=famulari.name header.s=mesmtp header.b=U5P52V1M; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm2 header.b=UjSARUgm; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -1.46 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=famulari.name header.s=mesmtp header.b=U5P52V1M; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm2 header.b=UjSARUgm; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 70646338A1 X-Spam-Score: -1.46 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: 6s+1k4nFfHF2 On Mon, May 03, 2021 at 09:38:56PM +0200, Tissevert wrote: > I've just given the binary tarball a spin on Devuan. Worked almost flawlessly > (daemonize wasn't installed and I missed the part when it was mentioned because > I was a bit in a hurry but apart from that the overall experience was great — > the guix text art was surprising in a good kind of way). I think that a big part of why we offer the SysV-init "/etc/init.d" service management script is to serve Devuan — there are not many distros using that style of service management anymore. If `daemonize` is not available by default on Devuan, I wonder if there is some other way we should be writing the script. Can you check some "Devuan provided" scripts in '/etc/init.d' and see if they use a different method of daemonizing things? > I got the warning about the GPG keys, and I confirm I got a single warning for > both keys at once with a very simple click'n'paste command to import the keys > and fix the problem. Great! > Once installed and the daemon started manually, it looks like it works (at > least the simple things I use do). To answer Leo's question if I understand it > correctly, I can guarantee you that absolutely no guix-related user or group > existed before I ran the script, and they have been successfully created (10 > guix builder users named `printf "guixbuilder%02d" <$> [1..10]` and 1 group named > guixbuild). Awesome, thanks for checking! That sounds exactly right.