Hey,

This time I think the 2nd version of the patch has the right format. Actually
it's kind of a 3rd version because there was still an indentation problem (tabs
had creeped undected as far as my package's description) and a repetition in
the text.

And I have no idea why using etc/indent-code.el had broken the whole file last
time, it's worked fine and has modified only my region this time. So, it was
still useful practice for me : ) And I really hope it's good this time : )

Kind regards,

Tissevert

Le Tue, May 04, 2021 at 10:56:27PM +0200, Tissevert a écrit :
> Hello !
> 
> Thanks a lot for all your feedback.
> 
> It took me a little while but I think I've improved my first patch proposal. I
> had tried to indent the code automatically like mentioned in the video tutorial
> using etc/indent-code.el but obviously this had failed. Maybe I overwrote the
> changes with vim ? Anyway, I tried doing it again but there are many other
> badly indented blocks in the rest of the file so it is hard to do and retain
> only what is in my new package. So I've done it twice during the process, but
> it could still be a little weird.
> 
> I changed the source to use the main «heavy» repos, and since it has a release
> tag but the actual commit corresponding to this tag is a little behind the
> current state (I checked the diff, it has changes to the vim files, not just
> the documentation) so I used the latest commit as target to be sure the most
> recent changes were included in the package even though I still call it by the
> name of the most recent tag.
> 
> So here goes.
> 
> Kind regards,
> 
> Tissevert
> 
>