From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms0.migadu.com with LMTPS id +HYoE/u2h2CHswAAgWs5BA (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 09:02:19 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id EIrUDvu2h2ChTAAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 07:02:19 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0247F2BC5D for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 09:02:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:41698 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lbHjd-0005UI-3X for larch@yhetil.org; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 03:02:17 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:49730) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lbHjO-0005Sx-Rt for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 03:02:02 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:36314) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lbHjO-0007pi-K9 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 03:02:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lbHjO-00028p-GU for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 03:02:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#47615] [PATCH 3/9] gnu: binutils: Adjust test suite on powerpc-linux. Resent-From: Efraim Flashner Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2021 07:02:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 47615 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Chris Marusich Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, 47615@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 47615-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B47615.16195069088208 (code B ref 47615); Tue, 27 Apr 2021 07:02:02 +0000 Received: (at 47615) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Apr 2021 07:01:48 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47860 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lbHj9-00028K-Tj for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 03:01:48 -0400 Received: from flashner.co.il ([178.62.234.194]:38010) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lbHj8-000288-F1 for 47615@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 03:01:46 -0400 Received: from localhost (unknown [31.210.177.125]) by flashner.co.il (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8FD3840333; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 07:01:40 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2021 10:01:08 +0300 From: Efraim Flashner Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: Chris Marusich , 47615@debbugs.gnu.org, guix-devel@gnu.org References: <8735vo1yhm.fsf_-_@gmail.com> <87sg3izywb.fsf_-_@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="s2KasUQJs++xMaN7" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87sg3izywb.fsf_-_@gmail.com> X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x41AAE7DCCA3D8351 X-PGP-Key: https://flashner.co.il/~efraim/efraim_flashner.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1619506939; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:resent-cc:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references: list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post; bh=shyR7zC97iURcKoUB7hsP8fzZBU5LcnStFEoHuBneRU=; b=FBdT0t/aVdCnhgqs6Edb+4Th0OTcq6XK3pEAP9b02i5njysUXnN/2lLGenhZNVlkTYaloo XqAl6txY4Z4OBqVaAUw0ERyQgz4+hgMaoCIFcuazUycij+0hdRsYAp9H5NNowt3PKAPEFt XfD8kdRSW9oP2Sg8TYITle1Sz/TCMNvn/NIputnzgLlIWZTLipubAABvZzrTKnWrIaXXw/ 10wd9LU1wsQsDymUH4Is1dMoLMBniCHAIjy+lnc4dL+Q+ksXWL+tbNBw6mfCbv62tTlsUB gU3/fC1uDubYyDLnNFRKtSqx7yQ60BU+X41pgabrOUB9WWP4e6ohsSpP4ErBig== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1619506939; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=uWAh36MEFG02ICtSEauGFlhmsiDFJE9Vhp89fSQFGRSBih5phvYgygen9Z/Gx7Vcp26nhK zt0Qw5CFIX6cVABaT0v14rlCJulcw7IK0nDhpR0MLelaIQrdylq7ksTVmqnr6OP3pBenMK TVpUfxPwSiz9kmOqTgQItCbXI7JZAecJCYW+V4OP5OLrGm5tCgQiO2xaiUE0KhGUySo5hM ozLQm+WMJYZrTWnDu4zJtz5KMDTP6ME4jHZm8buUiBwp/ofMTOVdiIdmRmXlgQdfqtu/nh OVd3eMv2jzCbCOYjcFCHij/Cj7Bfj4CPDrHgFeVJ+h6rhmBFTuIsdHfJxL21Rw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -4.05 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 0247F2BC5D X-Spam-Score: -4.05 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: Q/oyMNRG5jck --s2KasUQJs++xMaN7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 10:11:48PM -0700, Chris Marusich wrote: > Efraim Flashner writes: >=20 > >> If it's a test failure, has the issue been reported upstream? > > > > I'll check to see if I can find something upstream. If not I'll report > > it. FWIW Debian disables the test suite for powerpc. > > https://sources.debian.org/src/binutils/2.36.1-6/debian/rules/#L537 >=20 > How significant is the failure, anyway? Are we likely to encounter > trouble down the line on powerpc if we don't resolve this? I have no > idea, honestly, so I'm asking because I just don't know. I submitted the bug upstream. It turns out it was a bug in the test suite which only showed up on big-endian systems. They've fixed it in libiberty (in GCC) and I added the patch to binutils on core-updates. Tests pass on powerpc-linux and x86_64-linux. It also made this commit much much smaller :) --=20 Efraim Flashner =D7=90=D7=A4=D7=A8=D7=99=D7=9D = =D7=A4=D7=9C=D7=A9=D7=A0=D7=A8 GPG key =3D A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted --s2KasUQJs++xMaN7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEoov0DD5VE3JmLRT3Qarn3Mo9g1EFAmCHtrMACgkQQarn3Mo9 g1F4Zg//aB/5ygltnhht7rLRmpC6s2/naNNcqTlq/q4B5my9xPcHQTg4atZjc6yt znRTW9h10hlsZWStrz85AouRU6NFeRUz78KBrl5Hsr1lCSbmPrWsOmFX/fZAIinG Zx0yLdTHLKA7kT5vOvqDLWoryZY3iv9y9bsxjivg7wgr+UwsXLD4mKtu//LjzUhr zgFcAnJlHuQ9kXxU/AK7w90G1/DKGsik3025m3JrZKt87xmkBp5sOygy757z94Zf rbZ9Qm9WM3kmYiTRSOu4tuL+TZ+fxbuF0BpwVZrJ444l64BxmPGuG9MncAobISYQ DZk9Uke47aSx5jaxszqDLgzjNXLRzBBLHlca1hudJH290aJtpJv0ZF9wsBQXCKpB hfqTi1LkTAGWQNFNj2B9Pj657WDo5OFCXXqF3OOVAR9hccu45uB/h+mH4chnxaXJ 6FVyeV9bcIvUT/JJPeRSQrfLOKGwG1ds4uVWBu/WLfl4iYXfrkLnjTOH96zLdeVj smiOZA+fNiyJWqMsAQkJV6ZhURBXdRjlXuSe+UO9c6RJCokZU9yXNbnr6Sz5sfnw UG0JQGMFh1BMKLR5o6v1/rWApc+3C1Ic2NElCUJbZ9EAYhsS+Cq9yUA3pQvvj4fq 3F+YPzqVSkus/CrIyeEhbgwfarzehxFwxGjerpSbrzUDTNIbz2U= =RMXu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --s2KasUQJs++xMaN7--