On Tue, Apr 06, 2021 at 03:17:52PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Hi, > > For the record, changing ‘qt-build-system’ would trigger a rebuild of > less than 400 packages according to the back-of-the-envelope calculation > below. In that case, it’s tempting to fix on ‘master’ and include it in > the release. > > Thoughts? > There are a couple of other things we want to change with the qt-build-system and the wrappers. Another one is changing the wrappers so they prefix (or was it suffix?) QT_QPA_PLUGIN (and I think others) so they can run natively on wayland. I think it would be a good improvement and worth it. > Ludo’. > > --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- > scheme@(guile-user)> ,use(gnu) > scheme@(guile-user)> ,use(guix build-system qt) > scheme@(guile-user)> ,use(guix) > scheme@(guile-user)> (define qtpkgs (fold-packages (lambda (pkg lst) > (if (eq? (package-build-system pkg) qt-build-system) > (cons pkg lst) > lst)) > '())) > scheme@(guile-user)> (length qtpkgs) > $78 = 186 > scheme@(guile-user)> ,use(guix graph) > scheme@(guile-user)> ,run-in-store (node-edges (@ (guix scripts graph) %reverse-package-node-type) (fold-packages cons '())) > $79 = # > scheme@(guile-user)> (node-reachable-count qtpkgs $79) > $80 = 180 > scheme@(guile-user)> (+ 186 180) > $81 = 366 > --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- > > > -- Efraim Flashner אפרים פלשנר GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted