From: Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il>
To: zimoun <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com>
Cc: Guix Devel <guix-devel@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: Release on April 18th?
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2021 17:30:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YEjmEHdbF10Z7CFR@3900XT> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <86sg53cf58.fsf@gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2814 bytes --]
On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 02:27:47PM +0100, zimoun wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
> On Tue, 09 Mar 2021 at 10:17, Chris Marusich <cmmarusich@gmail.com> wrote:
> > zimoun <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com> writes:
> >
> >> Is it doable to have core-updates merged in the next weeks? Or not at
> >> all.
> >
> > Do we plan to upgrade GCC? This is required for the powerpc64le-linux
> > port; see below for details.
>
> You mean replace gcc-7 by gcc-8 or greater, right? It implies a
> core-updates merge, right?
>
>
> > The wip-ppc64le branch, which ports Guix to an architecture that can be
> > run on freedom-friendly POWER9 systems like the Talos II and Blackbird
> > from Raptor Computing Systems, is "almost" done, and I would really like
> > to try to get it into the next release if possible.
>
> Could be cool!
>
> > However, there is still some work to do, and I wouldn't necessarily want
> > to block the release just for sake of the powerpc64le-linux port.
> >
> > In fact, the wip-ppc64le branch was "fully functional" for a little
> > while. By "fully functional," I mean that "make check" succeeded, "make
> > guix-binary.powerpc64le-linux.tar.xz" succeeded, the resulting binary
> > could be installed on a fresh Debian ppc64le system, the binary could
> > successfully build and run GNU Hello, and the binary could successfully
> > run "guix pull", and the newly installed "guix pull" could do the same.
> >
> > However, that was using glibc 2.31. On core-updates, glibc has been
> > updated to 2.32, which unfortunately breaks wip-ppc64le. To fix it, we
> > must upgrade GCC from 7 to 8 (or greater), and that is what we have done
> > on the wip-ppc64le branch (upgrade GCC to 8). Currently, we are working
> > through build failures that occurred as a result, but I'm optimistic that
> > we can resolve those in the coming weeks.
>
> Thanks for the explanations.
>
>
> > The real question, I think, is when do we plan to upgrade GCC on
> > core-updates? It's still on GCC 7.5.0. The powerpc64le-linux port will
> > require GCC 8 or greater, since core-updates is now using glibc 2.32.
>
> Does it make sense to merge wip-ppc64le and core-updates?
>
I wanted an Easy Win™ and I've pushed a branch wip-ppc64le-for-master,
which cherry-picked (I think) all of the powerpc64le commits and
adjusted them to work against master WITHOUT affecting other
architectures.
I don't know why I thought it was an easy win, but if it looks good to
everyone I don't see why we couldn't merge powerpc64le into master by
the end of the week.
--
Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il> אפרים פלשנר
GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-10 15:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-02 14:51 Release on April 18th? zimoun
2021-03-02 16:00 ` Julien Lepiller
2021-03-02 20:03 ` Leo Famulari
2021-03-05 14:31 ` Andreas Enge
2021-03-05 19:27 ` Leo Famulari
2021-03-05 20:20 ` zimoun
2021-03-05 20:58 ` Leo Famulari
2021-03-05 23:57 ` zimoun
2021-03-06 20:14 ` Tobias Geerinckx-Rice
2021-03-03 14:16 ` Ludovic Courtès
2021-03-03 18:51 ` Leo Famulari
2021-03-04 9:41 ` zimoun
2021-03-04 19:07 ` Leo Famulari
2021-03-04 22:18 ` zimoun
2021-03-04 22:43 ` Leo Famulari
2021-03-05 20:19 ` Leo Famulari
2021-03-05 23:58 ` zimoun
2021-03-06 18:56 ` Leo Famulari
2021-03-06 19:06 ` Leo Famulari
2021-03-06 23:22 ` Leo Famulari
2021-03-07 3:51 ` Raghav Gururajan
2021-03-07 5:39 ` Raghav Gururajan
2021-03-07 20:44 ` Leo Famulari
2021-03-07 20:56 ` Raghav Gururajan
2021-03-07 20:50 ` Leo Famulari
2021-03-08 9:38 ` zimoun
2021-03-05 20:21 ` Leo Famulari
2021-03-09 18:17 ` Chris Marusich
2021-03-09 21:32 ` Vincent Legoll
2021-03-10 8:30 ` Release on April 18th? (ppc64le support specifically) Efraim Flashner
2021-03-11 9:10 ` Release on April 18th? Chris Marusich
2021-03-12 8:02 ` Vincent Legoll
2021-03-12 18:42 ` Chris Marusich
2021-03-12 18:52 ` Chris Marusich
2021-03-14 12:31 ` Vincent Legoll
2021-03-15 16:36 ` Ludovic Courtès
2021-03-16 4:03 ` Let's include powerpc64le-linux in the next release (was: Re: Release on April 18th?) Chris Marusich
2021-03-16 7:08 ` Efraim Flashner
2021-03-16 8:10 ` Léo Le Bouter
2021-03-23 13:42 ` Let's include powerpc64le-linux in the next release Ludovic Courtès
2021-03-23 13:47 ` Léo Le Bouter
2021-03-23 14:01 ` Tobias Geerinckx-Rice
2021-03-30 8:23 ` Ludovic Courtès
2021-03-30 22:20 ` Vincent Legoll
2021-03-23 17:09 ` Let's include powerpc64le-linux in the next release, " Chris Marusich
2021-03-10 13:27 ` Release on April 18th? zimoun
2021-03-10 15:30 ` Efraim Flashner [this message]
2021-03-10 15:59 ` zimoun
2021-03-10 18:33 ` Efraim Flashner
2021-03-11 8:58 ` Chris Marusich
2021-03-11 13:30 ` Efraim Flashner
2021-03-12 8:33 ` Chris Marusich
2021-03-12 10:11 ` Andreas Enge
2021-03-12 13:43 ` Efraim Flashner
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-02-28 6:53 I've rebased wip-ppc64le onto core-updates Chris Marusich
2021-02-28 20:42 ` Léo Le Bouter
2021-03-01 19:14 ` Tobias Platen
2021-03-01 21:36 ` jbranso
2021-03-10 10:17 ` Ludovic Courtès
2021-03-10 10:37 ` Efraim Flashner
2021-03-11 8:24 ` Chris Marusich
2021-03-11 8:37 ` Léo Le Bouter
2021-03-15 16:25 ` Ludovic Courtès
2021-03-16 4:26 ` I've rebased wip-ppc64le onto core-updates, Re: Release on April 18th? Chris Marusich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YEjmEHdbF10Z7CFR@3900XT \
--to=efraim@flashner.co.il \
--cc=guix-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=zimon.toutoune@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.