From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp12.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms5.migadu.com with LMTPS id SG66Kg6F5mM3RAEAbAwnHQ (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 10 Feb 2023 18:55:26 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp12.migadu.com with LMTPS id IFijKg6F5mNKwAAAauVa8A (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 10 Feb 2023 18:55:26 +0100 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8A3559041 for ; Fri, 10 Feb 2023 18:55:26 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pQXc3-00014P-68; Fri, 10 Feb 2023 12:55:07 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pQXbz-000147-Up for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Feb 2023 12:55:03 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pQXby-00077C-Px for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Feb 2023 12:55:03 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pQXby-00032b-D5 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Feb 2023 12:55:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#61246] [PATCH] gnu: libgit2: Update to 1.5.1. Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?Andr=C3=A9?= Batista Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2023 17:55:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 61246 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Maxim Cournoyer Cc: 61246@debbugs.gnu.org, zimon.toutoune@gmail.com Received: via spool by 61246-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B61246.167605168611662 (code B ref 61246); Fri, 10 Feb 2023 17:55:02 +0000 Received: (at 61246) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Feb 2023 17:54:46 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38052 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pQXbh-000322-Vc for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 10 Feb 2023 12:54:46 -0500 Received: from mx0.riseup.net ([198.252.153.6]:47232) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pQXbf-00031n-QP for 61246@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 10 Feb 2023 12:54:45 -0500 Received: from fews2.riseup.net (fews2-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.84]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mail.riseup.net", Issuer "R3" (not verified)) by mx0.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4PD1b15qrGz9sYQ; Fri, 10 Feb 2023 17:54:37 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak; t=1676051677; bh=1XCwxDx6pRPB6Zjtcj2wCfgrWUTBQ17EMVw/mtfBhnc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=GV/zYyAzn2dI3ZfNgQE8Mu4ZGXZW3hObA72SkyGabpzdjGdSvH+66dmXkF1BprXMd k4dUQXQ0h/M80/hypE6IT6nRu26P4js6ruiVLjtC+ydNonxI2L1feXOSBwhBHfJfeW fDChvVa6g7KjUBGMCH7Ojzu/o5wBEUftx+kl368Q= X-Riseup-User-ID: B8E476E2020A0EC3675D1B9195E56AFBA274A5E303A8BB8CB987E14209ACFBF6 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fews2.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4PD1Zz5JgYz20b2; Fri, 10 Feb 2023 17:54:35 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2023 14:53:32 -0300 From: =?UTF-8?Q?Andr=C3=A9?= Batista Message-ID: References: <20230203031129.3529-1-nandre@riseup.net> <877cwrjz9m.fsf_-_@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <877cwrjz9m.fsf_-_@gmail.com> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=riseup.net header.s=squak header.b="GV/zYyAz"; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=riseup.net (policy=none) ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1676051726; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=QIoKAwRHkaFmc53PTIKm8j5D5CwmTsoFEzDzWyFDiw/RC7TEh+DvIPhLSe8BtOjKU2QhRI bG9Ydaoki/3DpYsjWj1s0Uc+sN+EmHSKk68HYj/0bb1bFE3Dv2/lNyyKQZAKjymbTj7qRz vXfOt++OkW1yAWrurwor5haS+r2652YMjlZ7VqLoE5Mr0IEqfYbJYWRQpXCa6F8JZEorDG i3BSPjz5d+5UtT56atlUQtvwcY5eiCz/tvSH/eQ10E7rpoKfEygZAyTP4c78KMBu8dQ/ya EftfMc0Fm6ZrG/9lC8LTEKXty0RDRwqOraKTphxMOG4/u3bdSHfkhHiGSHpEqQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1676051726; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:resent-cc: resent-from:resent-sender:resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=OafC8SbVilt6WQhon00tME/mm3uj73aeGAJ1+T0aFqU=; b=axIZ0DUaCQdPvmcWUmcvuqCLRr+e2VF42G6pFk0HzUt6WhaSjrJXuEcNhI47pw+4fVUtTW t7rbyYbhu38FdOg/HncXeNDX3TU2VQmV/cbAyslslmfD0dbeP39NxYllwzH/36UC6wK5c/ VyleIG/xMcmeRRggSzP01emrAPxvyNSun/I9FEG3V+Ns1vXp+WSUpbiQLCv1iA0ix9Felu 6dDasK+6sLOvlU6zJWJJiqnydVKZ5+FAdlDpIckTAHUr/K1CE3KIoDZVW2djFuN3YH3FDR S7vhdGygjpcnB6RtVhTV3DLo6/WEZeKeusL9mIwVgIxxrgEHgVRVz9KJOOgP8A== X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-Migadu-Spam-Score: 6.59 X-Spam-Score: 6.59 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 8A3559041 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=riseup.net header.s=squak header.b="GV/zYyAz"; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=riseup.net (policy=none) X-TUID: 11TAcf8uxQuC Hi Maxim and Zimoun! qua 08 fev 2023 às 22:25:41 (1675905941), maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com enviou: > Hello André, > > (...) > > We do not use Github/Gitlab/etc. auto-generated tarballs has there is no > guarantee that they'll be bit-for-bit identical upon regeneration and > this led to broken checksums in the past. Could you please use the > tag/commit instead? Oh I did not know about that. I could use the git tag instead, but after yours and zimoun's messages I've noticed that: - I had only check dependencies using libgit2 without any @version numbers and so I thought that there were fewer dependencies than there are in fact; - no other package seems to be depending on libgit2-1.1, so it should be remove instead of updated, as zimoun suggested; - this patch should probably be on core-updates, not on master. So I'm inclined to agree with zimoun and just remove libgit2-1.1, what do you think? I'll work on another version of this patch and get back to you. > I noticed about this problem looking at the QA page here: > https://qa.guix.gnu.org/issue/61246. I'm not sure what are the other > problems reported, they look like false positives to me. I did not know about this QA service, thanks for pointing that out. I couldn't figure out the other warnings as well, but I only had a quick look at them. > Did you rebuild the dependent packages, used that with Guix without > problems so far? The QA has yet to answer that question. I did not rebuild all dependent packages yet, I've rebuild only my local dependencies on two machines (i686 and x86_64). Yesterday, however, I've bumped on a build error on libjami that could be related to this patch, even though it does not seem to be so at a first glance. The build error occurs at check phase with the following error: --- ./test/unitTest/test-suite.log ------------------------------------------ ====================================================== Jami Daemon 13.7.0: test/unitTest/test-suite.log ====================================================== # TOTAL: 15 # PASS: 14 # SKIP: 0 # XFAIL: 0 # FAIL: 1 # XPASS: 0 # ERROR: 0 .. contents:: :depth: 2 FAIL: ut_scheduler ================== .F !!!FAILURES!!! Test Results: Run: 1 Failures: 1 Errors: 0 1) test: jami::test::SchedulerTest::schedulerTest (F) line: 74 scheduler.cpp assertion failed - Expression: cv.wait_for(lk, std::chrono::seconds(3), [&]{ return taskRun == N; }) FAIL ut_scheduler (exit status: 1) error: in phase 'check': uncaught exception: %exception #<&invoke-error program: "make" arguments: ("check" "-j" "2" "V=1") exit-status: 2 term-signal: #f stop-signal: #f> phase `check' failed after 571.8 seconds command "make" "check" "-j" "2" "V=1" failed with status 2 --- Thanks for helping me out!