* limited compiler-rt support in llvm-15?
@ 2023-02-21 0:22 Haugen, Kjetil via
2023-02-26 12:03 ` Efraim Flashner
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Haugen, Kjetil via @ 2023-02-21 0:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: help-guix@gnu.org
[AMD Official Use Only - General]
Hello!
I'm in the process creating guix packages for rocm using upstream clang. I noticed that for clang-runtime-15, guix now explicitly deletes all static libraries which makes the packages with -rtlib=compiler-rt fail due to missing libclang_rt.builtins-x86_64.a. Is there any particular reason why guix made that change between clang-runtime-14 and clang-runtime-15? I'd like to propose to revert that change. I know I can always create my own clang-runtime-15 variant, but I was hoping to avoid the additional complexity of maintaining custom versions of clang-runtime and all the packages that depend on it.
Thanks,
KJ
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: limited compiler-rt support in llvm-15?
2023-02-21 0:22 limited compiler-rt support in llvm-15? Haugen, Kjetil via
@ 2023-02-26 12:03 ` Efraim Flashner
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Efraim Flashner @ 2023-02-26 12:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Haugen, Kjetil; +Cc: help-guix@gnu.org
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1189 bytes --]
On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 12:22:55AM +0000, Haugen, Kjetil via wrote:
> [AMD Official Use Only - General]
>
> Hello!
>
> I'm in the process creating guix packages for rocm using upstream clang. I noticed that for clang-runtime-15, guix now explicitly deletes all static libraries which makes the packages with -rtlib=compiler-rt fail due to missing libclang_rt.builtins-x86_64.a. Is there any particular reason why guix made that change between clang-runtime-14 and clang-runtime-15? I'd like to propose to revert that change. I know I can always create my own clang-runtime-15 variant, but I was hoping to avoid the additional complexity of maintaining custom versions of clang-runtime and all the packages that depend on it.
>
> Thanks,
> KJ
I looked through the git history and I didn't see anything obvious about
why they were deleted. I assume it was to save space. If it does break
linking like that then I don't see a reason why it couldn't be changed.
--
Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il> אפרים פלשנר
GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-02-26 12:04 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-02-21 0:22 limited compiler-rt support in llvm-15? Haugen, Kjetil via
2023-02-26 12:03 ` Efraim Flashner
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.