On Fri, Feb 24, 2023 at 01:36:06PM -0500, Mitchell Schmeisser via Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution. wrote: > jbranso@dismail.de writes: > > >> Guix System, 1 Gig of ram, etc, due to the package builder and Guix/Nix daemon? If it was possible > >> to declare an instance of Guix System that did not include those and only used cross-compiled > >> packages, could some portion of Guix System function in a similar way as Oniro, or is that a > >> nonsense question? > > What I understand your question to be is "Can we use Guix to describe an > embedded operating system which does not run Guix?" and I think the > answer is probably. I don't think the guix daemon is technically required > for the shepherd to boot (being the daemon is a shepherd process > itself). I can answer this. I built a one-off Guix image of gparted and it doesn't have the guix-daemon service included. > I don't think it's a good idea because you need the daemon in order to > use `guix deploy`. Otherwise you have to make an installation image and > it can become "involved." If you were willing to forgo `guix deploy` (and guix install, and really any package management) and just reflash it every time then the memory constraints go down to whatever the running programs require. -- Efraim Flashner אפרים פלשנר GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted