From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id KExrL/Y81V+pQgAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 12 Dec 2020 21:58:14 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id 4BolK/Y81V9mKgAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 12 Dec 2020 21:58:14 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3E96094014B for ; Sat, 12 Dec 2020 21:58:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:59602 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1koCu5-0007sJ-6y for larch@yhetil.org; Sat, 12 Dec 2020 16:58:13 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:44158) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1koCtu-0007rz-Jt for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Dec 2020 16:58:02 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:35452) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1koCtu-0001X9-Bt for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Dec 2020 16:58:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1koCtu-0008Iw-Ab for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Dec 2020 16:58:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#45151] [PATCH 1/1] gnu: Add openfortivpn Resent-From: Leo Famulari Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2020 21:58:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 45151 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: David Dashyan Received: via spool by 45151-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B45151.160781026431897 (code B ref 45151); Sat, 12 Dec 2020 21:58:02 +0000 Received: (at 45151) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Dec 2020 21:57:44 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46998 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1koCtc-0008IP-2O for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 12 Dec 2020 16:57:44 -0500 Received: from wout2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.25]:36273) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1koCtb-0008IA-0G for 45151@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 12 Dec 2020 16:57:43 -0500 Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BE4C386; Sat, 12 Dec 2020 16:57:37 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Sat, 12 Dec 2020 16:57:37 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=mesmtp; bh=wy48mLvuTl7yr8jgnwR5kfUE hE6aJsu7JM9vZdmgaXA=; b=BVe3NvFVYIlN79T91q/QbYrWa2bBrrpUx6JFJ2Py Eys0+VU7S62UjIQzcYytp1gcz9gnV8qAeNNahLUjo1Jm8S2IN4BlIX2uK+cBVkLQ aslB8693bzAXRnTwlo9FsQ6KhmcAX34pGPLc3Klkqbo8cpvq8TQp/Jem6YrhXkWQ Khc= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=wy48mL vuTl7yr8jgnwR5kfUEhE6aJsu7JM9vZdmgaXA=; b=VMYSpx8BABdnCZxHL7BS4A LjTjiqt9MApLX4YO7D0phoyyaJLIG1H15rOY6MT6xas0MGWLaj+jnGYGj4rKGSco Jam/iDqDfW+8y1lYF14kKbIfwluRrS6UTgY7XsoKgSL5rWTEg77hVd14nWtp3Fi5 5H6K25xeZ3FRIRT1mrLwqjR/aC7VncbAHi2Q4p3hVMLOnAJdd/J+PFRkvLueoEKD CBGPAZR+5pBRsBV+/oGy/DI1xhOfIq6Ww402zKmRAE3Bzy+/UVGBIiY/t1ow6Iwb AMs8dp7y7DlvY3Sg827TD9u+sayZA5vZvTgXnxoO2gFwaTYXqShKwxK2AZkYMhkA == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedujedrudekgedgudehiecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepfffhvffukfhfgggtuggjsehgtd erredttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefnvghoucfhrghmuhhlrghrihcuoehlvghosehfrghmuhhl rghrihdrnhgrmhgvqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpedukeevgeetkeeltefgiedtjefgje ekffduteehvdfhueekudelieekjeefheffteenucfkphepjeefrddugedurdduvdejrddu geeinecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomheplh gvohesfhgrmhhulhgrrhhirdhnrghmvg X-ME-Proxy: Received: from localhost (c-73-141-127-146.hsd1.pa.comcast.net [73.141.127.146]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id BDC87240057; Sat, 12 Dec 2020 16:57:36 -0500 (EST) Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2020 16:57:35 -0500 From: Leo Famulari Message-ID: References: <20201209214123.27762-1-mail@davie.li> <20201209225553.28596-1-mail@davie.li> <87mtyilrtp.fsf@davie.li> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="j8WnaNvoiCbpd7xl" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87mtyilrtp.fsf@davie.li> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: 45151@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -3.40 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail (headers rsa verify failed) header.d=famulari.name header.s=mesmtp header.b=BVe3NvFV; dkim=fail (headers rsa verify failed) header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm1 header.b=VMYSpx8B; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 3E96094014B X-Spam-Score: -3.40 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn1.migadu.com X-TUID: Ibsxt2+Wginu --j8WnaNvoiCbpd7xl Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Sat, Dec 12, 2020 at 10:58:26PM +0300, David Dashyan wrote: > BTW I'm what is the right way to send fixes patch? Sending the whole > thing again is easier on your side then adding commit patch on top? Yes, it's easier if you send a completely new patch rather than an incremental patch. Thanks again! --j8WnaNvoiCbpd7xl Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAl/VPM8ACgkQJkb6MLrK fwhWQQ//ZVGJMaVEfJQ3hyo7pxWJKg2B9+Ke7UBs2t7paBWQw4Cm6fLqfBHxYo6I OHizIHDYxXkmqImECuxlcIw7jummB3bJ6yK717wTFZ4wiyms8AvES8XmuVTP4SA5 BvisJt5gZ6mEzq97NZ++yH5ySqF2rKL4U2DydbM8X4BP60A4ayPWCLCXMAwv7Dxp YAH7vhPFthLJGmAgSwMLWbPX5rMHSVYaVJjUjizpbrG7RyanBvUpbLHVXQ+bp/3+ ogxtLpEOUAm8LhvJ9PUdlaf9zoZXbb6I1fD3HcbwBNY1DSoc51tLuzAuAR2w0soV Gc3bSTKUoKlSzY5QHBkC07OUgG54eZvXWE7KSNf2E1ch2W3uwIiNdfi4rQFpYzub g6xqBCOOlPCzoqov3E9eMugntci38Tv1Nis7mA0/3mDIJjF34dcdnYTSU551OO4R XqQsa2AerOkf3VTjHBTkVaXHBtOrdfQYy9svabpk1msYxqKykYJizRieKlsKAUZy gmsG2IFEZsseOy04jy0Iz8Vd682mX7VN8OD1t8MDkEYM72+/HFpxaD2kMRcl1Y7L KMpQNP/30SjdUeg1+NGVsWOMYS+b29YzVvkamYpps9El3YAerMLtuioAqtAJIHDV YDLH2Z+gtm0sGX7PNz6Uj1U11ybWs1lHO2jznT/PZGX0NCztXTg= =XTO9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --j8WnaNvoiCbpd7xl--