From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id eAnaCE6gyl9mVwAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 04 Dec 2020 20:47:10 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id 8GqgBE6gyl87GAAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 04 Dec 2020 20:47:10 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B5550940484 for ; Fri, 4 Dec 2020 20:47:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:58934 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1klHyu-0006qX-8L for larch@yhetil.org; Fri, 04 Dec 2020 15:47:08 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:45032) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1klGXr-0004Me-Ha for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Dec 2020 14:15:11 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:34294) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1klGXm-0003NY-39 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Dec 2020 14:15:03 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1klGXl-0008Rv-Vj for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Dec 2020 14:15:01 -0500 Subject: bug#26981: Bug report follow up Resent-From: Leo Famulari Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-To: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2020 19:15:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: cc-closed 26981 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Konrad Hinsen Mail-Followup-To: 26981@debbugs.gnu.org, leo@famulari.name, konrad.hinsen@fastmail.net Received: via spool by 26981-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D26981.160710929932450 (code D ref 26981); Fri, 04 Dec 2020 19:15:01 +0000 Received: (at 26981-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Dec 2020 19:14:59 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45838 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1klGXi-0008RJ-UZ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 04 Dec 2020 14:14:59 -0500 Received: from wout4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.20]:50423) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1klGXh-0008R7-RJ for 26981-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 04 Dec 2020 14:14:58 -0500 Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBCD57E3; Fri, 4 Dec 2020 14:14:51 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 04 Dec 2020 14:14:52 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=mesmtp; bh=42ARhNsttdQR8M+Jc0QfwK+6 WA/rwinQ3k9YW4LB1m4=; b=VQDHDYXJf1l4xdTExsSkdovt9khe65MUhEcBGCBQ 48unvGiWFuhIRpsDV3L56tlKoayZPBk3jv8pqsRk5Nd+xzLZ7eoedl+HE0vpUFkk M7yrsGk5C76T03K6prnxNXQDCIxpwhWtywp1SSrNZMUtSf6wKAH+XkarwM65rGYC yUM= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=42ARhN sttdQR8M+Jc0QfwK+6WA/rwinQ3k9YW4LB1m4=; b=rifp8Lq6YYPEgWD02FaA0r 8r9A3YRg+x4NBgvUKau3F60yRQSWX6B/uiQHmtN9whEukTNkkl3QzUNWF7dyT+Me U7/vwWDf0GuhnNDO60hR5mhys2euBG0yBA8RQax1tfKT9hEeYagv2P7rpr3pSFrw 5Xc3XT8ZnJADhTtWQvB1yGfYJXjAUp3tD6Mvm0jkZ1qs7XlcwENRkrMfomoUOccT QRQN+dl7ky1hBLoPbfd0Zw6tyuaQ0BtVveuma/YdmViOKLj2rn0ocJVWwXa9qmPn xOkc5pBFB81FzDJADVrq+obIiPgJ25yTz35iL3U5qAvyEKUwfTzTxKNDyxXBqEVg == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedujedrudeikedguddvvdcutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd enucfjughrpeffhffvuffkfhggtggujgesthdtredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepnfgvohcu hfgrmhhulhgrrhhiuceolhgvohesfhgrmhhulhgrrhhirdhnrghmvgeqnecuggftrfgrth htvghrnhepvddvudegffefiedttdfhfedvuefhgfekieekgeekveetgefhfeetgfeguedu ffeinecuffhomhgrihhnpehgnhhurdhorhhgnecukfhppeejfedrudeguddruddvjedrud egieenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehl vghosehfrghmuhhlrghrihdrnhgrmhgv X-ME-Proxy: Received: from localhost (c-73-141-127-146.hsd1.pa.comcast.net [73.141.127.146]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 8BC07108005B; Fri, 4 Dec 2020 14:14:50 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2020 14:14:49 -0500 From: Leo Famulari Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Robert Smith , 26981-done@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -1.29 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail (headers rsa verify failed) header.d=famulari.name header.s=mesmtp header.b=VQDHDYXJ; dkim=fail (headers rsa verify failed) header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm1 header.b=rifp8Lq6; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: B5550940484 X-Spam-Score: -1.29 X-Migadu-Scanner: ns3122888.ip-94-23-21.eu X-TUID: Mtv0VePIU5I2 On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 09:05:49AM +0100, Konrad Hinsen wrote: > Hi Robert, > > >> > The bug: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=26981 > >> > If I don't hear back I'll assume it's safe to close this. > >> > >> Yes, it is. Thanks for doing a cleanup! > > > > This bug report is still relevant? Or are you saying that it is fixed? > > Sorry if my email was a bit ambiguous! > > Right. My full answer is "Yes, it is safe to close this." Closing...