From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id iMfQAmB99V/3NgAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 06 Jan 2021 09:05:36 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2 with LMTPS id CKo2Ol999V+NDQAAB5/wlQ (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 06 Jan 2021 09:05:35 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D5399404FC for ; Wed, 6 Jan 2021 09:05:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:44640 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kx4l4-00087a-8d for larch@yhetil.org; Wed, 06 Jan 2021 04:05:34 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:39170) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kx4kq-00086M-7a for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Jan 2021 04:05:20 -0500 Received: from flashner.co.il ([178.62.234.194]:56278) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kx4ko-0001GN-DW; Wed, 06 Jan 2021 04:05:20 -0500 Received: from localhost (unknown [5.102.238.249]) by flashner.co.il (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 574ED4064B; Wed, 6 Jan 2021 09:05:16 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2021 11:04:43 +0200 From: Efraim Flashner To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Subject: Re: Guile 2.0 in make-bootstrap.scm Message-ID: References: <87zh1mqw10.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="tU/NyMCNXMRgDZIn" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87zh1mqw10.fsf@gnu.org> X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x41AAE7DCCA3D8351 X-PGP-Key: https://flashner.co.il/~efraim/efraim_flashner.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=178.62.234.194; envelope-from=efraim@flashner.co.il; helo=flashner.co.il X-Spam_score_int: 14 X-Spam_score: 1.4 X-Spam_bar: + X-Spam_report: (1.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS=3.335, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Guix-devel Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -3.94 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 4D5399404FC X-Spam-Score: -3.94 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: NTdEvGnOWBq2 --tU/NyMCNXMRgDZIn Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 10:01:15AM +0100, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: > Hi Janneke! >=20 > While uploading the powerpc64le-linux tarballs, I noticed they use Guile > 2.0, which reminded me of eef44fea17a735d2f4048a747d16af478d4b9dbc: >=20 > Revert "gnu: guile-static-stripped: Update to 2.2." > =20 > As discussed on IRC, keeping bootstrap Guile on 2.0 simplifies adding= new > architectures and removes the need for parameterizing > gnu/packages/bootstrap.scm. > =20 > This reverts commit 2acfe022a740f79b593348cc6362cc4ee8f33bb4. > =20 > * gnu/packages/make-bootstrap.scm (%guile-static): Revert to guile-2.= 0. Retain > build recipe. > * gnu/packages/patches/guile-relocatable.patch: Update for Guile 2.0.= 14. >=20 > Do you remember the reason for this change? >=20 > What=E2=80=99s surprising is that > does use > 2.2. >=20 That wasn't me? (I apparently touch everything) I remember guile-2.2 for the bootstrap had (likely) endianness ordering issues with PPC32, and it was far simpler to revert back to guile-2.0 than to try to fix it. --=20 Efraim Flashner =D7=90=D7=A4=D7=A8=D7=99=D7=9D = =D7=A4=D7=9C=D7=A9=D7=A0=D7=A8 GPG key =3D A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted --tU/NyMCNXMRgDZIn Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEoov0DD5VE3JmLRT3Qarn3Mo9g1EFAl/1fSsACgkQQarn3Mo9 g1Fd+w//aTBlZl/pEtXd6j4AgFNq34EBZ0WAS+J9N10NoeyJI1fru3QiUrNZUQws AYoQmDEDNUmHSeLZEupPwdRUOLgy6U4dbsAaqm6Ai7MF8kcIsNGk4TJppQ81v5HC 2+K9PwnvxKyf/PgFDPoKiwcgAkuaC1+kqqo+MlV7BiqcYqjZt+ohWwkwAQ3mIhTJ 0yB4tZI1kWolYdmFyrTwDo4mN3ZdbAyJ8xZhMqn6VhURQjGoW/CCe0WhrAH3YYwQ Q1+MdhSyUTA2jrSMiNfXnqJZ5esAIWT+7vVkCIpFyFBA13ucwWcny7Na+L0N5ohA ZRSyJM14XYsXrY03ZqLfO0TZYwq4yowJQIyg8fwf9g6r8IgKEw1hOrYYZMZeCRQ8 T8ld0BVDBt8ZjrAFzgdNZRx4Zv5qJRl9cEV8MDmve1PYV1qLG9aqn8JahiHwM0sC ls0N89hjWSY1q+HK8+RAK2EcI5gEX3ztH3KCCitZ5BYbSpqaiTcBgEx/wZl53l+F jQuB/6QmtnvUInAKP3fhfpEYHkOv2GS8P3vBOPLqPhSzSAI9p0OYlzVNNnN1huTJ zJMsnubcGxtw+Ucm1nzO7qC8+XIlsp+7s1w6VPS4en92E56BZISHd4DerBVbGgoK jjv5d2CM9yr+QZ1ZrkSwi/jqUBUrAxEzTECXt1yB3k+4RlnT7gY= =+74l -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --tU/NyMCNXMRgDZIn--